Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in
disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
Eric M. Schauber, Clayton K. Nielsen, Lene J. Kjær, Charles W. Anderson,
Daniel J. Storm
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu027
16-28 First published online: 27 March 2015
Abstract
In social species, individuals contact members of the same group much more
often than those of other groups, particularly for contacts that could directly
transmit disease agents. This disparity in contact rates violates the
assumptions of simple disease models, hinders disease spread between groups, and
could decouple disease transmission from population density. Social behavior of
white-tailed deer has important implications for the long-term dynamics and
impact of diseases such as bovine tuberculosis and chronic wasting disease
(CWD), so expanding our understanding of their social system is important.
White-tailed deer form matrilineal groups, which inhabit stable home ranges that
overlap somewhat with others—a pattern intermediate between mass-action and
strict territoriality. To quantify how group membership affects their contact
rates and document the spectrum of social affiliation, we analyzed location data
from global positioning system (GPS) collars on female and juvenile white-tailed
deer in 2 study areas: near Carbondale in forest-dominated southern Illinois
(2002–2006) and near Lake Shelbyville in agriculture-dominated central Illinois
(2006–2009). For each deer dyad (i.e., 2 individual deer with sufficient
overlapping GPS data), we measured space-use overlap, correlation of movements,
direct contact rate (simultaneous GPS locations < 10 m apart), and indirect
contact rate (GPS locations < 10 m apart when offset by 1 or 3 days). Direct
contact rates were substantially higher for within-group dyads than
between-group dyads, but group membership had little apparent effect on indirect
contact rates. The group membership effect on direct contact rates was strongest
in winter and weakest in summer, with no apparent difference between study
areas. Social affiliations were not dichotomous, with some deer dyads showing
loose but positive affiliation. Even for obvious within-group dyads, their
strength of affiliation fluctuated between years, seasons, and even days. Our
findings highlight the poor fit between deer behavior and simple models of
disease transmission and, combined with previous infection data, suggest that
direct contact is the primary driver of CWD transmission among free-living
female and juvenile white-tailed deer.
Key words:contact disease global positioning system group Illinois
landscape Odocoileus virginianus transmission white-tailed deer
snip...
Relating social contact patterns to infection patterns can help shed light
on fundamental questions of wildlife disease dynamics. For example, CWD can be
transmitted by both direct and indirect routes and indirect transmission of CWD
appears to be common in captive cervids; however, the relative importance of
direct and indirect contact for free-living cervid populations is unknown
(Miller and Williams 2003; Miller et al. 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006). Grear et al.
(2010) examined patterns of CWD infection in female white-tailed deer harvested
in south-central Wisconsin and found that the presence of a closely related
female deer infected with CWD in close proximity increased the odds of being
infected by > 100-fold relative to the presence of an unrelated infected
female (ln odds ratio [β] = 4.93 for related and 0.09 for unrelated,
exp[4.93−0.09] = 126). Their findings indicate that CWD transmission occurs much
more readily between members of the same matrilineal social group than between
groups or from males to females. Combining that result with our data indicating
that the distinction between within- and between-group contact rates is much
stronger for direct than indirect contacts, we find that the evidence is most
consistent with the hypothesis that direct transmission is the dominant mode of
CWD spread among free-living female white-tailed deer, at least at the present
stage of the epizootic. Because prions that cause CWD can persist for long
periods in the environment (Miller et al. 2004; Pedersen et al. 2006), the
relative importance of indirect transmission could increase as time progresses
and infection prevalence increases (Almberg et al. 2011). However, recent
research suggests that prion infectivity is substantially higher via inhalation
of aerosol than via ingestion (Denkers et al. 2013), again pointing to a key
role for close physical proximity in CWD transmission.
Tuesday, February 02, 2016
Illinois six out of 19 deer samples tested positive for CWD in the Oswego
zone of Kendall County
Friday, February 05, 2016
Report of the Committee on Wildlife Diseases FY2015 CWD TSE PRION
Detections in Farmed Cervids and Wild
Saturday, February 6, 2016
Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal Health; Meeting [Docket No.
APHIS-2016-0007] Singeltary Submission
kind regards, terry
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.