Minnesota Farmed Cervidae Bills HF 1202, SF 1526, (HF2814 DEAD) Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion
Minnesota Farmed Cervidae Bills HF 1202, SF 1526, (HF2814 DEAD) Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion
HF 1202
Description
Animal health; data classified, owners of farmed Cervidae requirements modified, registrations prohibited, civil liability established, federal fund disposition modified, live-animal testing for chronic wasting disease required, Board of Animal Health duties transferred to commissioner of natural resources, and money appropriated.
Authors
Actions
House
02/02/2023 | Introduction and first reading, referred to Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy |
02/06/2023 | Authors added Fischer; Tabke; Jordan pg. 703 |
02/09/2023 |
Minnesota confirms CWD in wild buck, with possible link to illegal dump site
'POSSIBLE' CONNECTION TO DUMP SITE
MORE FARM DETECTIONS IN WISCONSIN, TEXAS
Previous years' sampling results
APHIS Indemnity Regulations [Docket No. APHIS-2021-0010] RIN 0579-AE65 Singeltary Comment SubmissionComment from Singeltary Sr., Terry
Posted by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service on Sep 8, 2022TEXAS Legislators AND THE GOVERNOR, need to crawl out of bed with the damn captive deer farmers and start closing them down if they cannot keep them from spreading cwd to hell and back. that's what you need to tell the Texas Legislation, IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE...just my opinion...kind regards, terry''A third issue is the accuracy of mortality reporting. Department records indicate that for each of the last five years an average of 26 deer breeders have reported a shared total of 159 escapes. Department records for the same time period indicate an average of 31 breeding facilities reported a shared total of 825 missing deer (deer that department records indicate should be present in the facility, but cannot be located or verified).''TEXAS CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION TOTALS MOVE UP TO 449 TO DATECWD Positives in TexasCWD PositiveConfirmation Date Free Range/Captive County Source Species Sex Age
Pending Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer F 2.5 Pending Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 2.6 Pending Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 2.5 Pending Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer F 2.5 2023-01-03 Free Range Hartley N/A Mule Deer M 4.5 2023-01-03 Free Range Hartley N/A Mule Deer M 4.5 2023-01-03 Free Range Hartley N/A Mule Deer M 4.5 2023-01-03 Free Range Hartley N/A Mule Deer M 4.5 2023-01-03 Free Range Dallam N/A Mule Deer M 1.5 2023-01-03 Free Range Hartley N/A Mule Deer M 4.5 2023-01-03 Free Range Hartley N/A Mule Deer M 5.5 2023-01-03 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 2.4 2022-12-30 Free Range Medina N/A White-tailed Deer M 4.5 2022-12-30 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 2.5 2022-12-30 Breeder Release Site Uvalde Facility #3 White-tailed Deer Unknown Unknown 2022-12-22 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 4.5 2022-12-22 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer F 4.5 2022-12-22 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 4.5 2022-12-16 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer F 4.5 2022-12-16 Breeder Release Site Uvalde Facility #3 White-tailed Deer Unknown 6.0 2022-12-16 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 2.5 2022-12-15 Breeder Release Site Medina N/A White-tailed Deer F 6.5 2022-12-15 Breeder Release Site Uvalde Facility #3 White-tailed Deer Unknown 5.0 2022-12-15 Breeder Deer Hunt Facility #9 White-tailed Deer M 2.5 Showing 1 to 24 of 449 entriesTAHC CWD Summary Minutes of the 414th Commission Meeting November 15, 2022Summary Minutes of the 414th Commission Meeting – 11/15/2022snip...• Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD):2021 Incident 310 total affected herdso Seven positive facilities: three facilities in Uvalde, one in Duval, one in Hunt, one in Matagorda, & one in Masono 303 Trace herds: 177 Breeder facilities, 117 release sites, four nursing facilities, five DMP siteso Status: Released after meeting requirements:- 164 breeder facilities, 58 release sites/DMPs/nursing facilitiesSummary Minutes of the 414th Commission Meeting – 11/15/20223 Under a herd plan: three breeder facilities, 23 release sites/DMP Pending a signed herd plan: three breeder facilities, 44 release sites/DMP Out of state: eight facilities2022 Incident 84 total affected herdso 2 Positive facilities: Gillespie County – Confirmed August 30th Limestone County – Confirmedo 82 Trace facilities: 22 breeder sites, 59 release sites, and one DMP siteo Status Released after meeting requirements: seven breeder facilities, 2 release sites Signed herd plan: nine release sites Pending a signed herd plan: 15 Breeder facilities, 49 Release sites/DMP USDA VS review of the Texas CWD HCP UPDATEo TAHC is working with TPWD to modify the TWIMS database to better support the HCPo Review of all enrolled herds has begun, and is to be completed by the end of February 2023snip...Cooperative Award Award End Budget Rcd $$ Spent Encumbered Need to Spend21 CWD Depop/Genome Study 9/14/2022 $429,598 $375,032 $375,032 $0 $56,56621 CWD D4 TX (Depop) 9/14/2022 $274,968 $274,968 $274,968 $0 $022 CWD Lng Rnge/Low Energy 8/31/2023 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000FY 2022-2023 Collected Fee Revenue: $9,500 from CWD Inspection was projected, $16,550 was received year to datesnip...Item 13 – Consideration of and Possible Action on Proposed Rules Mr. Jabbar Fahim discussed the following Regulation Proposals:snip...b) Chapter 40, Chronic Wasting DiseaseThe Texas Animal Health Commission (commission) proposes amendments to Title 4, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 40, Chronic Wasting Disease. The proposed amendments both increase surveillance and reduce the risk of chronic wasting disease (CWD) being spread from areas where it may exist. §40.6 proposed adoption establishes one new containment zone (CZ) 5, expands existing CZ 2 and CZ 3, creates a new surveillance zone (SZ) 8, and modifies existing SZ 5 to either implement or improve surveillance efforts as part of the agency’s effort to manage chronic wasting disease (CWD).snip...Counties where CWD Exposed Deer were ReleasedNumber of CWD Exposed Deer Released by County“Regarding the current situation involving CWD in permitted deer breeding facilities, TPWD records indicate that within the last five years, the seven CWD-positive facilities transferred a total of 2,530 deer to 270 locations in 102 counties and eight locations in Mexico (the destinations included 139 deer breeding facilities, 118 release sites, five Deer Management Permit sites, and three nursing facilities).'' ...It is apparent that prior to the recent emergency rules, the CWD detection rules were ineffective at detecting CWD earlier in the deer breeding facilities where it was eventually discovered and had been present for some time; this creates additional concern regarding adequate mitigation of the risk of transferring CWD-positive breeder deer to release sites where released breeder deer come into contact with free-ranging deer...Commission Agenda Item No. 5 Exhibit BDISEASE DETECTION AND RESPONSE RULESPROPOSAL PREAMBLE1. Introduction.snip...A third issue is the accuracy of mortality reporting. Department records indicate that for each of the last five years an average of 26 deer breeders have reported a shared total of 159 escapes. Department records for the same time period indicate an average of 31 breeding facilities reported a shared total of 825 missing deer (deer that department records indicate should be present in the facility, but cannot be located or verified).TEXAS CWD STRAIN“Wow,” he said. “Unlike anything we've seen before.”The prions from the Texas deer were a lot harder to destroy than the ones from the Colorado elk. In fact, the guanidine barely damaged them at all. “We’ve never seen that before in any prion strain, which means that it has a completely different structure than we've ever seen before,” says Zabel. And that suggests that it might be a very different kind of chronic wasting disease. The researchers ran the same test on another Texas deer, with the same results.TEXAS CWD STRAIN77. Assessing chronic wasting disease strain differences in free-ranging cervids across the United StatesKaitlyn M. Wagnera, Caitlin Ott-Connb, Kelly Strakab, Bob Dittmarc, Jasmine Battend, Robyn Piercea, Mercedes Hennessya, Elizabeth Gordona, Brett Israela, Jenn Ballarde and Mark D ZabelaaPrion Research Center at Colorado State University; bMichigan Department of Natural Resources; cTexas Parks and Wildlife Department; dMissouri Department of Conservation, 5. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission CONTACT Kaitlyn M. Wagner miedkait@rams.colostate.eduABSTRACTBackground/Introduction: Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is an invariably fatal prion disease affecting captive and free-ranging cervids, including white-tailed deer, mule deer, moose, elk, and reindeer. Since the initial description of the disease in the 1960’s, CWD has spread to 23 states, 3 Canadian Provinces, South Korea, Norway and, most recently, Finland. While some outbreaks of CWD were caused by transport of infected animals from endemic regions, the origin of CWD in other epizootics is unclear and has not been characterized. Previous studies have shown that there are two distinct strains of CWD. However, the continuous spread and the unclear origin of several outbreaks warrant continued surveillance and further characterization of strain diversity.Materials and Methods: To address these knowledge gaps, we used biochemical tests to assess strain differences between CWD outbreaks in Michigan, Texas, Missouri, and Colorado, USA. Brain or lymph node samples were homogenized and digested in 50 µg/mL proteinase K (PK). These samples were then run on a Western blot to assess glycoform ratio and electrophoretic mobility. Texas samples were digested in 100 µg/mL PK. To assess conformational stability, brain or lymph node homogenates were incubated in increasing concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride from 0 M to 4 M in 0.5 M increments. Samples were then precipitated in methanol overnight, washed and PK digested in 50 µg/mL PK before slot blotting.Results: Our results have found significant differences in glycoform ratio between CWD from Michigan and Colorado, but no differences were observed in conformational stability assays. Interestingly, when testing our CWD isolates from Texas to analyse electrophoretic mobility and glycoform ratio, we found that these samples did not exhibit the characteristic band shift when treated with PK, but PK resistant material remained. Additionally, results from our conformational stability assay demonstrate a unique profile of these Texas isolates. Testing of samples from Missouri is currently underway.Conclusions: Thus far, our data indicate that there are strain differences between CWD circulating in Michigan and CWD in Colorado and provide important insight into CWD strain differences between two non-contiguous outbreaks. We have also identified a unique strain of CWD in Texas with biochemical strain properties not seen in any of our other CWD isolates. These results highlight the importance of continued surveillance to better understand this devastating disease. These results have important implications for CWD emergence, evolution and our understanding of prion strain heterogeneity on the landscape.The disease devastating deer herds may also threaten human healthScientists are exploring the origins of chronic wasting disease before it becomes truly catastrophic.Rae Ellen BichellImage credit: David Parsons/IstockApril 8, 2019This story was published in collaboration with the Mountain West News Bureau, a collaboration between Wyoming Public Media, Boise State Public Radio in Idaho, KUER in Salt Lake City and KRCC and KUNC in Colorado.SNIP...One day in late February, in their laboratory in Fort Collins, Colorado, Wagner and Zabel compared the prions from the brains of CWD-infected deer in Texas with those of elk in Colorado. They want to know if the proteins were all mangled in the same way, or not. “If they are different, this would suggest that we have different strain properties, which is evidence as we're building our case that we might have multiple strains of CWD circulating in the U.S.,” says Wagner.Step one is to see if they’re equally easy to destroy using a chemical called guanidine. The shape of a prion dictates everything, including the way it interacts with an animal’s cells and the ease with which chemicals can unfold it.“Moment of truth,” said Wagner, as she and Zabel huddled around a computer, waiting for results to come through. When they did, Zabel was surprised.“Wow,” he said. “Unlike anything we've seen before.”The prions from the Texas deer were a lot harder to destroy than the ones from the Colorado elk. In fact, the guanidine barely damaged them at all. “We’ve never seen that before in any prion strain, which means that it has a completely different structure than we've ever seen before,” says Zabel. And that suggests that it might be a very different kind of chronic wasting disease. The researchers ran the same test on another Texas deer, with the same results.Now, these are only the preliminary results from a few animals. Wagner and Zabel have a lot more experiments to do. But if future tests come to the same conclusion, it would support their hypothesis that there are multiple strains of chronic wasting disease out there, all with different origins. That, in turn, could mean that this disease will become even trickier to manage than it already is.And, Zabel adds, there’s something else. “If it's still evolving, it may still evolve into a form that could potentially, eventually affect humans,” he says.Zabel is not the only one worried about that possibility.OSTERHOLM, THE EPIDEMIOLOGIST from Minnesota, is also concerned. He directs the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, and is serving a one-year stint as a “Science Envoy for Health Security” with the U.S. State Department. In February, he told Minnesota lawmakers that when it comes to chronic wasting disease, we are playing with fire. “You are going to hear from people that this is not going to be a problem other than a game farm issue. You're going to hear from people that it's not going to transmit to people, and I hope they're right, but I wouldn't bet on it,” he said. “And if we lose this one and haven’t done all we can do, we will pay a price.”If that wasn’t warning enough, he added: “Just remember what happened in England.”He was talking about mad cow disease. Decades ago, Osterholm got involved in studying the potential for the newly emerging condition — bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE for short — to be transmitted to humans.At that point, researchers had yet to document a prion disease in animals that could infect people. They did, however, have a few pieces of the puzzle. For one, work in Papua New Guinea had shown that people could transmit prion diseases to each other if they practiced cannibalism, especially of the brain-eating variety. They also knew that BSE was spreading quickly between cattle. Osterholm says he and others worried that the more widespread it became, the more chances it might have to change into something that could sicken people.“A lot of people thought that it was an overreaction,” says Osterholm. “Then, of course, in 1996, 10 years later, we recognized that in fact transmission had occurred.” Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, as the illness is called when it appears in human beings, has infected about 230 people worldwide. Osterholm says he feels like he’s having déjà vu, except that instead of mad cow, now it’s chronic wasting disease that’s spreading in animals, with the potential to cross the species barrier to infect humans.SNIP...SEE FULL TEXT;***> TEXAS BREEDER DEER ESCAPEE WITH CWD IN THE WILD, or so the genetics would show?OH NO, please tell me i heard this wrong, a potential Texas captive escapee with cwd in the wild, in an area with positive captive cwd herd?apparently, no ID though. tell me it ain't so please...23:00 minute mark''Free Ranging Deer, Dr. Deyoung looked at Genetics of this free ranging deer and what he found was, that the genetics on this deer were more similar to captive deer, than the free ranging population, but he did not see a significant connection to any one captive facility that he analyzed, so we believe, Ahhhhhh, this animal had some captive ahhh, whatnot.''Biologists Stress Testing Harvests for Chronic Wasting Disease During Deer SeasonDec. 2, 2022Media Contact: TPWD News, Business Hours, 512-389-8030April 22, 2016Scrapie Confirmed in a Hartley County SheepAUSTIN - Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) officials have confirmed scrapie in a Hartley County ewe. The ewe was tested by TAHC after the owner reported signs of weight loss and lack of coordination to their local veterinarian. The premises was quarantined and a flock plan for monitoring is being developed by the TAHC and USDA."The TAHC is working closely with the flock owner, sharing all of the options for disease eradication," said Dr. David Finch, TAHC Region 1 Director. "We are thankful the producer was proactive in identifying a problem and seeking veterinary help immediately."Texas leads the nation in sheep and goat production. Since 2008, there have been no confirmed cases of scrapie in Texas. The last big spike in Texas scrapie cases was in 2006 when nine infected herds were identified and the last herd was released from restrictions in 2013.According to USDA regulations, Texas must conduct adequate scrapie surveillance by collecting a minimum of 598 sheep samples annually. Since USDA slaughter surveillance started in FY 2003, the percent of cull sheep found positive for scrapieat slaughter (once adjusted for face color) has decreased 90 percent.Scrapie is the oldest known transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, and under natural conditions only sheep and goats are known to be affected by scrapie. It is a fatal disease that affects the central nervous system of sheep and goats. It is not completely understood how scrapie is passed from one animal to the next and apparently healthy sheep infected with scrapie can spread the disease. Sheep and goats are typically infected as young lambs or kids, though adult sheep and goats can become infected.The most effective method of scrapie prevention is to maintain a closed flock. Raising replacement ewes, purchasing genetically resistant rams and ewes,or buying from a certified-free scrapie flock are other options to reduce the risk of scrapie. At this time the resistant genetic markers in goats have not been identified, therefore it is important to maintain your sheep and goat herds separately.The incubation period for Scrapie is typically two to five years. Producers should record individual identification numbers and the seller's premise identification number on purchase and sales records. These records must be maintained for a minimum of five years.Producers should notify the Texas Animal Health Commission (800-550-8242) or the USDA-Austin Office (512-383-2400) if they have an adult sheep or goat with neurologic signs such as incoordination, behavioral changes, or intense itching with wool loss. Producers may order scrapie identification tags by calling 866-873-2824. For more information, please visit our website at:web.archive.org/web/20160607024701/http://www.tahc.texas.gov/news/pr/2016/2016-04-22_TAHCScrapie.pdfScrapie: The flock identified in April 2016 remains under quarantine in Hartley County.Scrapie Field Trial Experiments Mission, Texas, The Moore Air Force Base Scrapie TSE Prion Experiment 1964 How Did CWD Get Way Down In Medina County, Texas?DISCUSSIONObservations of natural outbreaks of scrapie indicated that the disease spread from flock to flock by the movement of infected, but apparently normal, sheep which were incubating the disease.There was no evidence that the disease spread to adjacent flocks in the absent of such movements or that vectors or other host species were involved in the spread of scrapie to sheep or goats; however, these possibilities should be kept open...snip...PLEASE READ THE FULL REPORT ON THE SCRAPIE FIELD TRIAL EXPERIMENTS IN MISSION, TEXAS!!!4 MOST ENDANGERED WHITETAIL DESTINATIONS IN AMERICAMark KenyonMARK KENYON Jun 3, 20224 Most Endangered Whitetail Destinations in AmericaIt would not be hyperbole to say that we’re quite possibly living in the “golden age” of whitetail deer hunting.Deer populations might be higher now than ever before and, at least since records have been kept, bigger, older bucks have never been more numerous. Hunters smash world and state records every year. The good times sure seem to be rolling.But this isn’t true across all aspects or locales within the whitetail range, nor is it guaranteed to remain true into the future. All good things can and do come to an end.The future of deer and deer hunting, as is the case with almost every aspect of the natural world today, exists on a precipice. Serious threats like disease, habitat loss, resource management, and public opinion all loom on the horizon. Four specific threatened locations, in particular, stand out as representative of larger issues threatening our nation’s deer hunting future. These are, in our estimation, the four most endangered whitetail destinations in America.Read on for an introduction to these special yet threatened whitetail locales. And find out what we can do as deer hunters and stewards of the land to address the challenges in these specific locations and across the nation.SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSINGreatest Threat: Chronic Wasting DiseaseSouthwest Wisconsin, a world-renowned big buck destination, is also ground zero for chronic wasting disease. The 100% fatal neurological disease impacting whitetails and other deer species has now spread to 29 states across the country. CWD is widely recognized as possibly the greatest existential threat to the future of whitetail hunting, and no place is it more ubiquitous than Wisconsin’s driftless area.In some regions here, hunters are observing population-level impacts and CWD prevalence rates have hit as high as 30%. In more practical terms, this means that some areas of the whitetail-crazy state of Wisconsin might be experiencing the beginnings of downward trends in populations due to CWD. Almost one in three deer tested in these areas are testing positive. While CWD’s large-scale impact on deer populations is no joke, an equally concerning risk is the impact that positive tests have on the desire to hunt and eat deer at all. While transmission from deer to humans hasn’t been documented, it’s theoretically possible—akin to what happened with Mad Cow Disease in the 1990s. For this reason, the CDC currently advises hunters not to consume venison from a CWD-positive deer. The result of all this is that a lot of hard-earned venison is getting thrown in the dump already, and things, hypothetically, stand to worsen.This worst-in-class state of affairs is partly due to a passive approach to CWD management that Wisconsin adopted in 2012, moving away from their “earn a buck” rule, stopping targeted population controls, and making testing in known CWD areas only voluntary.“Because of the passive management approach taken by Wisconsin, CWD is endemic to five southwest counties, has spread to surrounding counties, and has been found in 38 of the state’s 72 counties,” said southwestern Wisconsin resident, hunter, and land consultant Doug Duren. “In some areas in those counties where prevalence is being studied, over 50% of adult bucks and over 35% of adult does are CWD positive.”In conversations with other area residents, Duren heard anecdotal reports of seeing fewer older deer and mature bucks, increasing numbers of late-stage infected animals in need of putting down, and already dead deer. “One member of a group of hunters with a lease in Iowa County, Wisconsin told me they decided to give up their lease and find opportunity elsewhere as every buck they killed in the past three years tested positive for CWD,” he said. “This is a cautionary tale.”While there is no single simple fix to this problem, the recently introduced Chronic Wasting Disease Research and Management Act would designate $35 million in badly needed funding for CWD research and another $35 million for management and surveillance that would certainly help the situation in Wisconsin and beyond. Click here to let your senators know this is an issue of supreme importance to deer hunters in your state.SNIP...TEXASGreatest Threat: Captive Deer IndustryThe great state of Texas sports one of the most robust and proud deer hunting cultures in the nation, but it’s also home to what some consider the greatest threat to deer hunting in all of America: the captive deer industry.The debate around the captive deer industry is complicated, long-standing, and fraught, but the issues can be distilled into two main categories. First is the well-documented risk of spreading CWD by way of the transfer and sale of captive deer. Second is the negative impact that captive deer shooting facilities, and the media created around them, can have on the public perception of hunting in America and the North American Model of Conservation.Texas is home to more captive deer facilities than any other state by a long shot, with 858 locations. The conditions present at such facilities, with high numbers of animals in close quarters, are well known to be a perfect storm for the spread of CWD. Not to mention the fact that given the transactional nature of captive deer breeding, many animals are sold and shipped across wide swaths of the country, potentially cross-contaminating new herds of deer all along the way.While there have been increasing amounts of testing and monitoring of these herds for CWD, the effectiveness of these efforts are feared to be sub-par at best. “The profit motive is so great, it is common for deer breeders to hide infections, or simply not test, and thus spread the disease,” writes Whit Fosborg, CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.All of this makes Texas a likely ground zero for future CWD issues, a perfect example being a 2021 investigation that identified the release of more than 1,700 deer from seven Texas captive deer facilities that could have been exposed to chronic wasting disease. “Overwhelmingly, the CWD hot zone maps radiate from captive facilities across the state,” said Texas resident and bowhunter K.C. Smith.Furthermore, the proliferation of captive deer facilities and “canned shooting preserves” threaten to shine a poor light on the larger hunting public, potentially hemorrhaging support for the free-range pursuit of whitetails in Texas and elsewhere. While the vast majority of non-hunters support hunting for food, those figures reverse when considering “trophy hunting.” Animals that are custom-bred to grow the largest antlers possible and then housed in high-fenced small enclosures and sold off to be shot by the highest bidder represents the most egregious example of what trophy hunting could be percieved as. Regardless of whether or not most high-fence facilities fit this description, the worst offenders are unfortunately what most people notice. We as whitetail hunters risk being defined by our most fringe element, especially in the Lone Star state.It’s important to note that many of the high fence deer facilities in Texas very well might be well-managed and owned by good honest deer-loving people, Smith was quick to remind me. This is not as cut and dry of an issue as some non-Texans want to believe it is.“I have an easy set of values to live by: don’t hurt people and don’t take their stuff,” he said. “However, when the deer ‘owned’ by another person are threatening to take away the future of my kids’ and everyone’s deer hunting, something must be done.”Support for the Chronic Wasting Disease Research and Management Actwill help just as much here as in Wisconsin, as would advocating for greater oversightof the captive deer industry in Texas and beyond.Governor Abbott on HOW TO LEGISLATE SPREADING CWD TO HELL AND BACK IN TEXAS $$$i picked up on something that was said, there were several folks complaining that the breeders were gettingpicked on, and someone said something about trying to 'legislate' there way out of this. folks, this is terrible, ihave seen this in other states, and it just spreads cwd even more. hell, it happened right here in Texas in theearly days, that's why we are where were at now, you cannot let a bunch of Austin Legislative Socialites regulateCWD, just look what happened in Wisconsin. but i bet this attempted swaying of regulatory power shift fromTPWD et al to the Texas Legislature in Austin is happening as we speak. we can't let this happen...SUNDAY, JANUARY 22, 2017Texas 85th Legislative Session 2017 Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion Cervid Captive Breeder IndustryFRIDAY, JANUARY 27, 2017TEXAS, Politicians, TAHC, TPWD, and the spread of CWD TSE Prion in TexasSUNDAY, MAY 14, 201785th Legislative Session 2017 AND THE TEXAS TWO STEP Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion, and paying to play $$$Powerful Abbott appointee's lobbying sparks blowback in LegislatureIn an ironic twist for Gov. Greg Abbott, who has made ethics reform an urgent political priority, the Texas House is taking aim at what critics call a "pay to play" culture among his appointees.BY JAY ROOT MAY 12, 2017 12 AMHouston billionaire Dan Friedkin is chairman of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission.Texas Parks and Wildlife CommissionWhen Gov. Greg Abbott tapped one of his top campaign donors to become chairman of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission, he didn’t get a part-time appointee who would merely draft rules and implement conservation laws passed by the Legislature.In Dan Friedkin, the governor got a Houston billionaire — with a team of privately funded lobbyists — willing to use his influence to ensure his wildlife interests are taken into account by the Legislature before they pass those laws, interviews and records show.On the receiving end of that influence, and not in a happy way, is state Rep. Chris Paddie, R-Marshall. Paddie said a lobbyist working for Friedkin’s business empire, which includes a massive South Texas hunting ranch, has been working against his deer breeder management bill, which many large ranchers oppose. The state Parks and Wildlife Department oversees deer breeding regulations in Texas.“Many times these appointees are well-heeled, very influential people,” Paddie said. “Overall, I feel that it’s inappropriate for an appointee of a board or commission to have personal lobbyists lobbying on issues related to that board or commission.”Under Texas law, state agencies are barred from lobbying the Legislature. But the powerful people who oversee them aren’t.If Paddie and dozens of his colleagues get their way, that practice soon will be a Class A misdemeanor.Last weekend, Paddie attached a ban on appointee lobbying — which would apply to any issues intersecting with their state responsibilities — to an ethics bill that already had powerful friends of the governor in its crosshairs. The provision was adopted unanimously and the bill sailed out of the Texas House on a 91-48 vote Saturday.The ethics bill, authored by Rep. Lyle Larson, R-San Antonio, would bar big campaign donors from getting appointed by governors in the first place. Anyone who contributed over $2,500 would be barred from serving on state boards and commissions.Larson pointed to news articles documenting the amount of campaign money appointees have collectively given governors. Last year the San Antonio Express-News calculated that Abbott had received nearly $9 million from people he’s picked for appointed office; before that, a widely cited report from Texans for Public Justice found former Gov. Rick Perry had received $17 million from his own appointees.Larson said 20 years from now, Texans will be reading the same stories about a future governor unless the Legislature does something about it now.“We’ve read that article for the last three decades,” Larson said during a brief floor speech. “This is your opportunity to say, 'We need to stop this.' The most egregious ethics violation we’ve got in the state is the pay to play in the governor’s office.”A prodigious fundraiser, Abbott has put plenty of big donors on prestigious boards and commissions. On the Parks and Wildlife Commission alone, he has installed three mega-donors — pipeline mogul Kelcy Warren, who’s given Abbott more than $800,000 over his statewide political career; Houston businessman S. Reed Morian, who has given $600,000; and Friedkin, who personally donated more than $700,000 — while his Gulf States Toyota PAC gave Abbott another $100,000, according to Ethics Commission records.Passage of Larson’s HB 3305 represents an ironic twist for Abbott, who for the second session in a row has made ethics reform an urgent political priority — resulting in a bill that's now taking aim at his gubernatorial appointments. Abbott, who has made a habit of ignoring tough questions, hasn't made any public statements about the bill, and his office did not respond to multiple requests for comment.Friedkin — whose wealth is estimated at $3.4 billion by Forbes — is the owner and CEO of Gulf States Toyota, founded in 1969, which has had the exclusive rights to distribute new Toyotas in Texas and four nearby states. He’d also been a mega-donor to former Gov. Rick Perry, who first appointed Friedkin to the Parks and Wildlife Commission in 2005. Abbott made Friedkin chairman of the commission in 2015.Requests for comment from Friedkin's office went unanswered.In addition to his public role as parks and wildlife chairman, a perch that gives him significant influence over deer management issues, Friedkin has private wildlife interests. He owns the sprawling Comanche Ranch in South Texas, according to published news accounts.The January 2014 edition of Texas Wildlife, published by the Texas Wildlife Association, described Friedkin’s Comanche Ranch as “privately owned and privately hunted” and said it’s “in the business to produce as many trophy bucks as possible, without damaging the native habitat.”The association, which advocates for private landowners and hunting rights, has locked horns with deer breeding interests at Parks and Wildlife and the Capitol. They compete against each other in the lucrative trophy deer hunting market — and the battle between them perennially spills into the rule-making process at the Parks and Wildlife Commission.One of their battles centers on how captive deer are tagged so that game wardens and others can distinguish them from native deer. Current law requires a combination of tags and tattoos, and the ranchers and large landowners want to keep it that way. The breeders, meanwhile, favor tagging deer with microchips, which they contend are more accurate and foolproof.The Wildlife Association said in a Facebook post that removing visible tag or tattoo requirements and allowing microchip tracking “creates real biosecurity risks and blurs ethical lines in the hunting community, as captive deer breeders are allowed to transport and release these animals to be co-mingled with pasture-born deer.” Proponents of the current system say tough rules on breeders are needed to keep out imported deer that may carry Chronic Wasting Disease, which has been found in Texas.On the other side of the issue is the Texas Deer Association, which represents breeder interests. Executive Director Patrick Tarlton said opposition to his $1.6 billion industry stems less from environmental and health concerns and more from wealthy ranch owners who want to boost profits from trophy-seeking hunters. He notes that Chronic Wasting Disease has been found in both free range and captive deer.Paddie sided with the breeders by filing House Bill 2855, which would allow breeders to track their deer with microchips instead of relying on physical tags that they say can be torn off.No one identifying themselves as a Friedkin corporate lobbyist opposed the deer breeding bills during public hearings, according to House and Senate committee records published online.Behind the scenes, it was a different story.Paddie said his chief of staff reached out to Laird Doran, one of several lobbyists for Friedkin’s Gulf States Toyota, after hearing that he was trying to convince other legislators to help defeat Paddie's deer microchip bill.“My chief called him and said, 'Hey, if you’ve got a problem with our bill why aren’t you talking to us?’ ” Paddie said. “He said he represented the Friedkin Group when that happened.”According to an email from an aide to Sen. Craig Estes, R-Wichita Falls, who is carrying the deer breeding bill in the Senate, Doran also identified himself as a representative of the “Friedkin Group.” That’s the name of the consortium that contains Friedkin's Gulf States Toyota, according to the company’s Linked-In page. He told Estes’ aide that the Friedkin group was opposed to any bill that would “remove requirements for (deer) ear tags,” the senator’s office confirmed.It’s not clear exactly which Friedkin interests Doran was advancing. Doran is registered at the Texas Ethics Commission with a single entity — Gulf States Toyota — and the agency has no record of a lobbyist working for an entity or individual with the name Friedkin in it, the commission confirmed Wednesday afternoon.However, Doran checked a variety of non-automotive subject areas in which he is lobbying during this legislative session on behalf of Friedkin’s lucrative distributorship, including “animals,” “parks & wildlife,” “state agencies, boards & commissions,” “environment” and more, his detailed lobby disclosures show.Doran, director of government relations and senior counsel at the Friedkin Group, did not return phone and email messages left by The Texas Tribune.Estes said he didn’t have a problem with a governor's appointee engaging in lobbying on issues that affected their private interests, as long as they keep that separate from their state roles.“I don’t think they should be barred from expressing their views as long as they’re careful to say these are my views, not the views of the agency I’m representing,” Estes said.But Tarlton, the deer association director, said Friedkin’s use of lobbyists to oppose deer breeders in the Legislature gives the breeders' opponents a huge advantage.“I think that if the commissioner of Texas Parks and Wildlife is actively lobbying against an industry which his department directly oversees, it absolutely sets up an unfair and closed system of government,” Tarlton said. “The commission is supposed to be the unbiased and equitable oversight for everything wildlife.”Paddie hopes his amendment to Larsen's ethics bill will even the playing field. He referred to the wealthy Parks and Wildlife chairman (see the 2:29:00 mark in this recorded exchange) when he tacked the appointee-lobbying provision onto Larson’s bill.Paddie said he’s not singling out anyone. He said it would apply to other powerful gubernatorial appointees in a position to do the same.“I could have named any number of examples as far as the agencies in particular,” Paddie said. “I want to stop it if anyone serving on any agency is doing this.”Ryan Murphy contributed to this report.Disclosure: The Texas Wildlife Association, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and Gulf States Toyota have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune. A complete list of Tribune donors and sponsors is available here.Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Your opinions and comments have been submitted successfully. Thank you for participating in the TPWD regulatory process.Wednesday, October 28, 2015Interim Chronic Wasting Disease Response Rules Comment online through 07:00 a.m. November 5, 2015SUNDAY, AUGUST 23, 2015Subject: Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion and how to put lipstick on a pig and take her to the dance in Texas I was listening to a radio show the other day here in the Galveston bay area, and outdoor show, they had a breeder or someone from the industry on, and I was amazed at the false information he was spewing. the part about the poor little girl with her pet deer crying in the breeder pen, ......cry me a friggen river, they are raising the damn deer to put in a pen to slaughter, or to breed for that purpose, AND you ought to see a human die from this shit. my mother did everything Linda Blair did in that movie the exorcist except spin her head 360 degrees. she DID levitate in bed because she would jerk so bad, where it took three grown strong adults to hold her down to keep her from hurting herself, all the while screaming God why can’t I stop this. so cry me a fucking river on a damn deer they are raising to have slaughtered, but whine because the TPWD et al are going to kill it to try and prevent the spread of disease cwd. if the TPWD et al had a better way of confirming or not whether those cervid had CWD, they would do it. the live tests they have to date do not work 100%, so there for they have not been validated. oh that’s fine with the pen owners, but it’s not fine for Texas. you don’t want a cwd test that just works part of the time. it’s total ignorance out there now, and they will put lipstick on this pig and take her to the dance, just like TAHC did with mad cow disease, and that’s well documented. they will change what ever law to meet their needs$$$ I will agree with this much of what the industry said this morning, that cwd has been in Texas for a long time, and in the pens to, and that the TAHC has not tested enough, that much he got correct. I have been saying this year, after year, after year, since back to 2001, to the TAHC, and told them exactly where they should be testing back in 2001, and then year after year after year, up and until 2012, where they finally did test there in enough numbers to find it a decade later, exactly where I been saying it was. the cwd deer have been waltzing across Texas from there for over a decade. it does not matter if I am pro-pen or not. that will not and does not change the science. why in the hell did they speak about the 4 confirmed deer from that index herd, yes, I said 4 now. why is not the TAHC TPWD telling that to the public now. why did not that guy today speak of 4? all the newspapers are reporting it, and I ask about the 4th case weeks and weeks ago? where is that information at on TAHC site? I am a meat eater, I am pro-hunt, and extremely pro-gun, I am however anti-stupid and anti-prion, prions can kill you, I don’t want to eat prions, you should not either. but here is the kicker, you eat meat infected with CWD TSE prion, your exposed, however you never go clinical in your life........BBBUT, your exposed and if you go on to have surgical, dental, tissue, blood donations, etc. you risk exposing my family and others...I will simply post this one short abstract of an old study the late great Dr. Gibbs...Texas 84th Legislative Session Sunday, December 14, 2014*** TEXAS 84th Legislature commencing this January, deer breeders are expected to advocate for bills that will seek to further deregulate their industryTUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2014Texas 84th Legislature 2015 H.R. No. 2597 Kuempel Deer Breeding Industry TAHC TPWD CWD TSE PRIONexpand this to see all breeder cwd, and then think of what they have released at release sites...“Regrettably, the gravity of this situation continues to mount with these new CWD positive discoveries, as well as with the full understanding of just how many other facilities and release sites across Texas were connected to the CWD positive sites in Uvalde and Hunt Counties,” said Carter Smith, Executive Director of TPWD.TAHC Chapter 40, Chronic Wasting Disease Terry Singeltary Comment Submission***> TEXAS HISTORY OF CWD <***Singeltary telling TAHC, that CWD was waltzing into Texas from WSMR around Trans Pecos region, starting around 2001, 2002, and every year, there after, until New Mexico finally shamed TAHC et al to test where i had been telling them to test for a decade. 2012 cwd was detected first right there where i had been trying to tell TAHC for 10 years.***> Singeltary on Texas Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion History <***Minnesota Bills Cervid Captive Game Farms Chronic Wasting Disease
- Mar 3, 2022 — A bill for an act relating to agriculture; prohibiting ... prohibiting importation of white-tailed deer from Cervidae farms; appropriating
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home