UTAH CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION SURVEILLANCE AND TESTING PROGRAM 70 mule deer and two elk have tested positive
UTAH CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION SURVEILLANCE AND TESTING PROGRAM
In Utah, CWD has been detected in free-ranging cervids in three different
geographic areas
Chronic Wasting Disease has been found in three different geographic areas
within Utah (see CWD positive map). The disease was first discovered in Utah in
2002 in a buck taken during the rifle hunt near Vernal. A second positive was
discovered in Utah in early 2003, when a mule deer doe that died in an
agricultural field near Moab, Utah, also tested positive. A third area of Utah
was found with CWD in late 2003 when a mule deer doe taken in a depredation
situation near Fountain Green tested positive. To date, 70 mule deer and two elk
have tested positive for CWD in Utah. The highest prevalence rate (two percent)
in Utah is found on Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) 13, the La Sal Mountains,
where 50 of the 70 deer and one positive elk have been found. Prevalences are
less than one percent in the other two areas of Utah, near Vernal (WMU 9) and
Fountain Green (WMU 16).
Surveys have also found CWD in free-ranging deer, elk or moose in parts of
Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia,
West Virginia, Wisconsin and in the Canadian provinces of Saskatchewan and
Alberta. It has also been found in captive deer and/or elk in 13 states and two
Canadian provinces. In the endemic areas of Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska, it
is found in less than one percent of wild elk and in one percent to 15 percent
of wild deer populations. In 2005, Colorado confirmed that a bull moose tested
positive for CWD, making it the first time CWD has been found in a wild moose.
CWD has since been found in free-ranging moose in Wyoming and the Canadian
province of Alberta. In March 2016, CWD was detected for the first time in
free-ranging reindeer in Norway.
There is considerable concern that CWD will spread into additional Utah
deer, elk or moose populations. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is
conducting random sampling of deer and elk to check for the disease.
SNIP...
Since the inception of CWD surveillance activities in 1998 nearly 20,000
samples have been collected and tested from most of the WMU's throughout the
state. Distribution of the disease occurs in three distinct geographical areas
and has been detected in 4 WMU's (8, 9, 13, and 16) which include 6 counties;
Daggett, Grand, Sanpete, San Juan, Uintah, and Utah. As of May 2015 a total of
60 mule deer samples and two elk samples have tested positive for CWD. In
addition, CWD was detected in two captive elk facilities in late 2014. The
facilities were located within WMU 3 and 14. Disease surveillance and response
to CWD outbreaks in captive elk facilities fall under the jurisdiction of Utah
Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF) (http://ag.utah.gov/)
SNIP...
What is DWR currently doing about CWD? The goal of the DWR is to maintain a
management program for CWD that provides the public with factual information,
provides early detection, and prevents spread of the disease. Units where CWD
already exists are sampled on an annual basis to monitor the prevalence and
distribution of the disease. Targeted surveillance, or the removal of
symptomatic animals, continues on all WMU's throughout the state. Units where
CWD has not been detected to date are sampled on a rotational basis in order to
detect new infection foci as early as possible. Within these units, the
objective is to sample an adequate number of deer that allows the detection of a
one percent prevalence of CWD with 95 percent confidence. Hunters can help with
the CWD surveillance efforts by stopping at hunter check stations and allow the
DWR to sample their deer.
The history of CWD in Utah The DWR first began looking for CWD in 1998 at a
request from the CDC. The effort was initiated in response to a young resident
of northern Utah whom had contracted Creutzfeld-Jakob Disease. This person was a
hunter and had harvested and consumed deer and elk from the state. Samples were
collected from areas where these individual hunted and nearly 700 samples were
collected and tested over a two-year-period. CWD was not detected during these
efforts and scaled back surveillance continued from 1999 to 2002. The majority
of samples collected during this period were from symptomatic deer, elk, and
moose, none of which were positive.
In early 2002, the Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife announced the
finding of a CWD positive mule deer in western Colorado. This caused concern
given the proximity of the animal to the Utah border. Beginning that fall nearly
1,500 samples were collected from targeted Wildlife Management Units (WMU's)
around the state. It was during the testing of these samples that a mule deer
buck harvested in WMU 9 near Vernal, Utah tested positive.
Elk afflicted with chronic wasting disease
Photo by Dr. Beth Williams Soon after, outbreak surveillance measures were
implemented in an effort to determine distribution of the disease. A 5-mile
radius was established around the location where the positive deer was
harvested. The DWR then culled 84 mule deer and collected and tested samples,
none of which were positive. However, a second CWD positive mule deer was
detected later that year near the town of Moab in southeastern Utah (WMU 13).
The animal had been exhibiting clinical signs of the disease prior to dying in
an agricultural field on the west side of the La Sal Mountains.
Surveillance efforts continued through the 2003 hunting seasons and samples
were collected primarily from mule deer in 17 of 30 WMU's. A total 9 positive
mule deer were detected during these efforts with most positives coming from
WMU's where the disease was detected the previous year. However, CWD was found
in a new area in central Utah (WMU 16) when a mule deer that DWR employees
culled in an agricultural field tested positive for the disease. A 5-10 mile
radius was established around the area where the positive deer was harvested,
and a total of 107 deer were culled by the DWR. None of these were positive for
CWD.
Since the inception of CWD surveillance activities in 1998 nearly 20,000
samples have been collected and tested from most of the WMU's throughout the
state. Distribution of the disease occurs in three distinct geographical areas
and has been detected in 4 WMU's (8, 9, 13, and 16) which include 6 counties;
Daggett, Grand, Sanpete, San Juan, Uintah, and Utah. As of May 2015 a total of
60 mule deer samples and two elk samples have tested positive for CWD. In
addition, CWD was detected in two captive elk facilities in late 2014. The
facilities were located within WMU 3 and 14. Disease surveillance and response
to CWD outbreaks in captive elk facilities fall under the jurisdiction of Utah
Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF) (http://ag.utah.gov/)
Management and surveillance summary The goal of the DWR is to maintain a
management program for CWD that provides the public with factual information,
provides early detection, and prevents spread of the disease. The DWR has
actively participated in CWD management by working to prevent infection,
eliminate infection, and perform maintenance activities in areas where CWD has
been found. The DWR's objective is to sample all WMU's with adequate deer
populations that will allow the collection of statistically valid sample sizes
to detect the presence of CWD at a one percent prevalence level with 95 percent
confidence limits. The primary source of samples will come from mule deer
because of the higher reported prevalence rate, which can be greater than 15
percent, versus one percent prevalence rate in elk.
By 2006, the goal to sample all wildlife management units in the state with
adequate deer populations to determine distribution of CWD in the state was met.
Beginning in 2006, some units that have been tested in previous years will be
resampled. Units where CWD already exists will continue to be sampled on an
annual basis to monitor the prevalence and distribution of CWD. Targeted
surveillance, or the removal of symptomatic animals, will continue on all WMU's
throughout the state.
Sampling methods The medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes of mule deer in all
sample units, as well as elk from positive deer units, are collected. All
samples are sent to the Utah State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory
(UVDL) in Logan, Utah, for analysis. UVDL has been approved by the National
Veterinary Sciences Laboratory (NVSL) to test for chronic wasting disease. UVDL
uses the IDEXX HerdChek CWD Antigen EIA (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook,
ME) and the PRECESS 48 system, (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Life Science Group,
Hercules, CA) as rapid tests. Any positives that are detected by the Bio-Rad or
IDEXX systems are verified using the "gold standard" Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
assay test.
Carcass regulations As of May 2015, chronic wasting disease has been
detected in Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South
Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Alberta, and
Saskatchewan.
The DWR has taken measures to prohibit the import of deer, elk and moose
carcasses from known infection areas. Only the following parts of wild deer, elk
and moose may be imported from designated infection areas from other
states.
Meat that is cut and wrapped either commercially or privately Quarters or
other portion of meat with no part of the spinal column or head attached Meat
that is boned out Hides with no heads attached Skulls plates with antlers
attached that have been cleaned of all meat and tissue Antlers with no meat or
tissue attached Upper canine teeth known as buglers, whistlers or ivories
Finished taxidermy heads It is unlawful to import dead mule deer, white-tailed
deer, elk, moose or their parts, except for the carcass parts listed above, from
the following states, provinces, game management units, equivalent wildlife
management units, or counties. Additional areas may be added as necessary.
Alberta WMUs 116, 118, 119, 142, 144, 148, 150, 151, 152, 158, 160, 162,
163, 164, 166, 200, 202, 203, 232, 234, 236, 242, 256, 500, 728 and 730 Arkansas
Boone and Newton counties Colorado: Game Management Units 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,
29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48,
49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59, 66, 67, 69, 75, 76, 77, 84, 86, 87, 88, 89,
90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107,
109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 120, 121, 131, 161, 171, 181, 191,
211, 214, 231, 301, 361, 371, 391, 411, 421, 441, 461, 511, 512, 521, 591, 691,
861, 951 Illinois: Counties of Boone, DeKalb, DuPage, Grundy, Jo Daviess, Kane,
Kendall, LaSalle, McHenry, Ogle, Stephenson, Will, and Winnebago Iowa: Allamakee
and Davis counties Kansas: Counties of Cheyenne, Decatur, Ellis, Ford, Gove,
Graham, Harper, Logan, Norton, Rawlins, Sheridan, Sherman, Smith, Stafford,
Thomas, Trego and Wallace. These counties are included in Deer Management Units
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 17 Maryland: Allegany County Michigan: Clinton, Ingham and
Shiawassee Counties Minnesota: Olmsted County, deer permit areas 348, 349, 601,
236 Missouri: Macon, Adair and Cole counties Nebraska: Counties of Arthur,
Banner, Boone, Box Butte, Buffalo, Cherry, Cheyenne, Custer, Dawes, Deuel,
Garden, Grant, Hall, Harlan, Hitchcock, Holt, Hooker, Keith, Kimball, Lincoln,
Loup, Morrill, Nance, Red Willow, Scotts Bluff, Sheridan, and Sioux New Mexico:
Game management Units 19, 28 and 34 New York: Oneida County (confirmed in 2005;
containment protocols lifted 2010) North Dakota: Deer unit 3F2 Saskatchewan
Wildlife Management and Herd Reduction Areas 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 24, 25, 29,
43, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 62, 68s South Dakota: Counties of Fall River, Lawrence,
Custer and Pennington, Wind Cave National Park and Custer State Park
Pennsylvania: Adams, Bedford, Blair and Jefferson counties Texas: El Paso,
Lavaca, Medina, Hudspeth and Uvalde counties Utah: Wildlife Management Units 8,
9, 13, 14 and 16 Virginia: Frederick, Shenandoah, Warren and Clarke counties
West Virginia: Hampshire and Hardy counties Wisconsin: Counties of Burnett,
Washburn, Polk, Barren, Marathon, Shawano, Wood, Protage, Waupaca, Juneau,
Adams, Waushara, Marquette, Calumet, Manitowoc, Sheboygan, Vernon, Crawford,
Richland, Grant, Sauk, Iowa, Lafayette, Dane, Columbia, Green, Rock, Walworth,
Racine, Kenosha, Dodge, Washington, Sheboygan, Jefferson, Waukesha, Milwaukee.
Deer Management Zones 15 (Washburn Co), 53 (Adams Co), 54B (Juneau Co), 54B-CWD,
57A (Portage Co), 70-CWD, 70A-CWD, 70B-CWD, 70C-CWD, 70D-CWD, 70E-CWD, 70F-CWD,
70G-CWD, 71-CWD, 73B-CWD, 73E-CWD, 75A-CWD, 75B-CWD, 75C-CWD, 76-CWD, 76A-CWD,
76M-CWD, 77A-CWD, 77B-CWD, 77C-CWD. Also including any deer registered with a
Wisconsin DNR red registration tag from the areas designated as the Disease
Eradication Zone. Wyoming: Deer hunt areas 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 18, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 51, 55,
57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 70, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81,
82, 84, 87, 88, 89, 92, 97, 98, 116, 119, 120, 122, 123, 124, 125, 127, 132,
157, 160, 163, 164, 165 and 171. Elk hunt areas: 3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 16, 19, 35,
108, 110, 117, 125 Non-residents transporting harvested deer, elk, or moose
carcasses through Utah may do so if they do not stay in Utah more than 24 hours,
do not leave any part of the animal carcass in Utah, and do not have their deer,
elk, or moose processed in Utah.
How can hunters help? Immediately report all deer that appear sick or
emaciated to a DWR office, biologist or officer. The DWR will attempt to locate
the animal and remove a tissue sample from the head for testing.
Salt Lake Office, 801-538-4700 Southeastern Region, 435-613-3700 Central
Region, 801-491-5678 Northeastern Region, 435-781-9453 Southern Region,
435-865-6100 Northern Region, 801-476-2740 Hunters harvesting animals from areas
where testing is needed may be requested to cooperate by removing the cape from
the deer or elk in the field or by taking the head to a Division office
immediately after it is caped. The DWR can then remove a lymph node sample for
testing.
Can hunters have their deer or elk tested for CWD? The DWR has implemented
an aggressive surveillance plan to target deer in specific units throughout the
state. CWD infection in the endemic areas of Wyoming, Colorado and Nebraska are
found in less than one percent of wild elk populations and one to 15 percent of
wild deer populations. Therefore, testing strategies mainly target deer and not
elk, although the DWR will test any deer or elk exhibiting clinical symptoms of
CWD. Hunters who have harvested a deer in one of the CWD sampling units, or who
harvest an elk in a CWD positive area, are requested to take their animal to the
nearest regional office or wildlife check station to have a tissue sample
removed for testing. To qualify for testing, the animal must be older than one
year old, must not have been dead longer than three days, and the head of the
animal must not have been frozen at any time. Hunters may view the results on
the Internet after allowing four to six weeks for processing.
Hunters who harvest an animal in a non-target sampling unit, but still wish
to have their deer or elk tested for chronic wasting disease, may do so at a
cost by providing the head to the Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Lab in Logan, Utah
or the Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Lab in Nephi, Utah. In this case, the DWR will
remove a sample from any harvested deer or elk, but the hunter is responsible
for getting the sample to the lab and for paying the $25 testing fee. Deer and
elk must be older than one year of age to be eligible for testing.
Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Lab 950 E 1400 N Logan, UT 84322
435-797-1895
Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Lab 1451 S Main St Nephi, UT 84648 435-623-1402
Chronic Wasting Disease in Utah by Wildlife Management Unit Map Showing CWD
Positives
2015 map — (PDF
Cervidae (elk and deer)
All captive elk imported into Utah shall originate from states which have
implemented a program for surveillance, control, and eradication of CWD in
captive cervids, and must originate from herds that have been participating in a
verified CWD surveillance program for a minimum of 5 years.
Privately captive cervids entering Utah require the following: 1.A prior
Elk Farms and Elk Hunting Parks with the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food
2.No captive cervids imported into Utah can originate east of the 100th
meridian. 3.Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (Health Certificate) 4.Import
permit 5.Proof of ownership or elk brand inspection 6.Two negative tuberculosis
tests conducted not less than 90 days apart except elk under six months of age
accompanied by a negative testing dam, or elk originating from an accredited,
qualified, or monitored herd, in which case a single negative test within 60
days of entry into the state is acceptable. 7.A negative brucellosis test run by
at least two types of official brucellosis testing is required on all animals
six months of age or older within thirty (30) days prior to entry. 8.The
following signed statement must appear on the Certificate of Veterinary
Inspection: "To the best of my knowledge the captive cervids listed herein are
not infected with Johne's disease (Paratuberculosis), Chronic Wasting Disease,
or Malignant Catarrhal Fever and have never been east of the 100 degree
meridian." 9.The herd of origin must have performed monitoring for Chronic
Wasting Disease at least equal to the Utah herd.
Elk semen, eggs, or gametes imported to Utah require a Certificate of
Veterinary Inspection stating:
"The source animal(s) have been tested for genetic purity for Rocky
Mountain Elk genes and have never resided on a premise where CWD has been
identified."
For more detailed information about importation of captive cervids, see the
full text of Administrative Rule R58-18, Elk Farming, and Administrative Rule
R58-20, Domesticated Elk Hunting Parks.
UTAH Chronic Wasting Disease in One Domestic Elk
Statement Regarding Confirmation of Chronic Wasting Disease in One Domestic
Elk
The office of the State Veterinarian confirms that one domestic bull elk
has tested positive for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). The discovery came
following routine testing of a male elk that was harvested by a hunter at the
Broadmouth Canyon Ranch in Weber County.
The infected animal was among 11 elk transported in early October, 2014 to
the hunting ranch from the Howe’s Elk Ranch in San Juan County. All but two of
the remaining 10 animals tested negative. Tests on the remaining two are
currently being conducted with results expected shortly. Both elk ranches are
under quarantine, which prohibits any elk from being moved from either facility.
State Veterinarians are working with the State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory
in Logan, Utah and the National Veterinary Services Laboratory (NVSL) in Ames,
Iowa to confirm the origin of the infected animal. As a means to prevent the
spread of CWD, the State Veterinarian’s Office is recommending the remaining elk
at the San Juan County ranch be euthanized and tested.
This is the first confirmed case of CWD in domestic elk in Utah since the
creation of the Domestic Elk Act in 1997. CWD has been present in wild deer in
Utah since 2002 and wild elk since 2009. Chronic Wasting Disease is a rare
disease affecting the brains of mule deer, black-tailed deer, white-tailed deer,
elk, and moose. The disease belongs to a group of diseases called transmissible
spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs).. There is no known cure for TSEs, and they
are always fatal in susceptible host species. There is no scientific evidence
that CWD can spread to humans. The Center of Disease Control has thoroughly
investigated any connection between CWD and the human forms of TSEs and stated,
“the risk of infection with the CWD agent among hunters is extremely small, if
it exists at all,” and “it is extremely unlikely that CWD would be a food borne
hazard.
##
Contact: Dr. Warren Hess (801) 538-4910 Larry Lewis (801) 538-7104 Cell
(801) 514-2152
posted: Feb. 3, 2015
Saturday, January 31, 2015
Chronic wasting disease found in bull elk killed on private Utah
ranch
Chronic Wasting Disease Found in New Area in Utah
by Outdoor Hub on December 20, 2011
species: Mule Deer location(s): Utah
A deer infected with chronic wasting disease has been found in a new area
in Utah. That’s not a surprise, though—the new area is next to an area where the
disease has been for years. 1,200 samples taken this fall Technicians at the
Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory in Logan have finished testing tissue
samples taken from more than 1,200 deer, elk and moose this fall. Hunters across
Utah took the animals, and biologists with the Division of Wildlife Resources
collected the samples. One of the deer that was taken on the San Juan deer
hunting unit in southeastern Utah tested positive for the disease. This is the
first time a deer from the unit has tested positive for chronic wasting disease
(CWD). Leslie McFarlane, wildlife disease coordinator for the DWR, says she’s
not surprised that a deer from the San Juan unit tested positive for CWD. “We’ve
found deer with CWD on the La Sal Mountains,” she says. “The La Sal Mountains
are just north of the San Juan unit.” Most deer are disease free Fortunately for
Utah’s deer herds, CWD is not widespread in Utah. Since 2002, almost 19,000 deer
have been tested in the state. Of the nearly 19,000 deer, only 54 tested
positive for CWD. The 54 deer came from three major areas in Utah:
Area Number of deer
Southeastern Utah 38
Central Utah 10
Northeastern Utah 6
One elk, no moose To date, only one elk—a cow taken on the La Sal
Mountains in November 2009—has tested positive for the disease. CWD has never
been found in a moose in Utah. Learn more CWD is fatal to deer, elk and moose.
But there’s no evidence that it can be transmitted to humans. More information
about CWD is available at http://go.usa.gov/5d8.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
CWD UTAH San Juan deer hunting unit
Friday, March 12, 2010
Elk tests positive for CWD UTAH Posted Thursday, 11 March 2010
Subject: CWD SPREADS TO CENTRAL UTAH, DEADLY DISEASE FOUND IN MORE DEER
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." flounder9@VERIZON.NET
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE-L@LISTS.AEGEE.ORG
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:44:10 –0600
Content-Type: text/plain Parts/Attachments: Parts/Attachments text/plain
(71 lines) Reply Reply
##################### Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
#####################
snip...
Utah CWD Results Are In From the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources The
Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory in Logan has finished testing more than
2,100 deer for chronic wasting disease. The deer were taken during Utah's 2005
fall hunting seasons.
Of the more than 2,100 deer tested, eight had the disease, the Division of
Wildlife Resources announced Jan. 13.
Two of the eight deer were taken during last fall's muzzleloader season,
and six were taken during the rifle hunt.
In addition to the deer that were tested, laboratory personnel are almost
done testing about 300 elk taken this fall. So far, none of the elk have tested
positive for the disease. CWD has never been found in elk in Utah.
"The disease appears to be staying within areas where we've already found
it," said Leslie McFarlane, wildlife disease specialist for the DWR. "In central
and northeastern Utah, we estimate that less than 1 percent of the buck
population is affected by CWD. In the LaSal Mountains in southeastern Utah, we
estimate about 2 percent of the buck deer have the disease."
McFarlane was surprised to find CWD in two deer taken in central Utah this
past fall.
"A deer killed near Fountain Green in the summer of 2003 tested positive
for the disease, and we were hoping that would be the only deer we would find in
that part of the state," she said. "We tested more than 1,000 deer in that area
in the fall of 2003 and 2004 and didn't find any other deer with the disease.
"The two deer that tested positive this year, however, confirms that we do
have the disease in the central part of the state."
The two central Utah deer were taken about eight miles apart from each
other near the Spencer Fork Wildlife Management Area, about 20 miles north of
Fountain Green.
In addition to the two central Utah bucks, five deer taken in the LaSal
Mountains this past fall had the disease. So did a yearling buck taken near the
south end of Flaming Gorge Reservoir. That was the first CWD-positive deer found
in that specific area, but other CWD-positive deer have been in the past near
Vernal, just 20 miles to the south.
All of the hunters who took the deer have been notified that their animals
tested positive for CWD.
CWD First Confirmed in Utah in 2003
Since the fall of 2002, almost 10,300 deer in Utah have been tested for
CWD. A total of 26 of those deer had the disease.
Eighteen of the 26 deer came from the LaSal Mountains, four came from the
Vernal area, one was taken near the south end of Flaming Gorge, one was killed
near Fountain Green, and two were taken 20 miles north of Fountain Green.
CWD is fatal to deer and elk that contract it. However, according to the
World Health Organization, "There is currently no evidence that CWD in cervidae
(deer and elk) is transmitted to humans."
For more information about CWD, visit the DWR's Web site at http://www.wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame/cwd
Date 18 Oct 2005
From: Terry S Singeltary Sr Source: Utah
Division of Wildlife Resources [edited] <http://www.wildlife.utah.gov/news/05-10/cwd_found.php>
2 buck deer taken during this year's Utah muzzleloader hunt have tested
positive for chronic wasting disease (CWD), the Division of Wildlife Resources
announced on 17 Oct 2005.
The 1st deer was a yearling buck taken near the south end of Flaming Gorge
Reservoir. This is the 1st CWD positive deer found in Daggett County. Other CWD
positive deer have been found in the past just 20 miles to the south, near
Vernal. The 2nd deer to test positive was a mature buck taken on the LaSal
Mountains in south eastern Utah.
Both of the hunters who took the deer have been notified that their animals
tested positive for CWD. "We've tested approximately 450 deer and elk so far
this year, and these are the only animals that have tested positive for CWD,"
said Leslie McFarlane, wildlife disease specialist for the DWR. "Nearly all of
the testing has been completed on samples collected during the archery and
muzzleloader hunts. We expect to collect nearly 2000 samples during the rifle
deer hunt that starts this weekend."
The Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory in Logan is testing the samples
for the DWR. The latest finds bring to 20 the number of deer that have tested
positive for CWD since the disease was first found in Utah in February 2003. 14
of the 20 deer have come from the LaSal Mountain area, where DWR biologists
estimate about 2 per cent of the deer have the disease. Of the remaining deer, 4
came from the Vernal area, 1 was taken near the south end of Flaming Gorge, and
one was killed near Fountain Green in central Utah.
CWD is fatal to deer and elk that contract it. However, according to the
World Health Organization, "There is currently no evidence that CWD in cervidae
(deer and elk) is transmitted to humans."
******
[2]
Date: 18 Oct 2005
From: Terry S Singeltary Sr Source: Utah
Division of Wildlife Resources [edited] <http://www.wildlife.utah.gov/news/05-10/cwd.php>
Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) personnel are in the process of
monitoring the presence and prevalence of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in the
State of Utah. A small number of deer harvested in the state have tested
positive for CWD during the past 4 years. Sportsmen participating in the general
season rifle hunt, which opens 22 Oct 2005, are encouraged to participate in
this disease monitoring effort.
Testing for the disease is done by removing the lymph nodes from the throat
of the deer. The abnormal prions (proteins) indicative of CWD tend to accumulate
in these lymph node tissues. Lymph node samples from each deer sampled are sent
to a laboratory in Logan and hunters can learn whether the deer has tested
positive for CWD within 4 weeks.
Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that the disease can be
transmitted to humans by eating or handling meat of infected animals. However,
it is advised that hunters avoid consumption and direct contact with brain
tissues, spinal fluids, and lymph nodes.
DWR personnel will be taking disease samples from deer harvested throughout
the south eastern region. Hunters may encounter officers in the field or at
check stations. Hunters who are not contacted and have questions regarding CWD
can contact the Price DWR office at (435) 636-0260 during business hours, or
(435) 820-8921 during non-business hours.
******
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." flounder@WT.NET
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE-L@UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:22:42 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain
Parts/Attachments: Parts/Attachments text/plain (49 lines) Reply Reply
######## Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
#########
Deer from northeastern Utah tests positive for Chronic Wasting
Disease
Additional information about Chronic Wasting Disease
Salt Lake City — A buck deer taken by a hunter in northeastern Utah has
tested positive for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), the Division of Wildlife
Resources has announced.
"The Division of Wildlife Resources has been looking for Chronic Wasting
Disease in Utah since 1998," said Jim Karpowitz, big game coordinator for the
Division of Wildlife Resources. "When the Colorado Division of Wildlife
discovered a CWD positive deer near the town of Craig in early 2002, we decided
to intensify our surveillance efforts, focusing on mule deer populations along
the Colorado border."
Nearly 1,500 brain samples were collected from deer and elk in Utah in fall
2002. Almost 1,400 of the deer and elk have been tested for CWD so far, with
only one positive sample.
The positive sample came from a mature buck deer taken this fall on Diamond
Mountain, just north of Vernal. Utah State University is conducting CWD testing
for the DWR. See map — (PDF format)
"It's important to remember that there is currently no evidence that CWD
can be naturally transmitted to humans or livestock," Karpowitz said. "It also
does not appear to cause catastrophic die offs in deer and elk
populations."
A great deal of research is being conducted by many agencies and
organizations to learn more about this relatively new disease. "Until more is
known, we'll continue to be diligent with our surveillance and management
efforts and provide the public with the most current information available,"
Karpowitz said.
Another excellent source of information is a national Web site ran by the
Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance (cwd-info.org). "This site includes links to
CWD information on other Web sites," Karpowitz said. "I would encourage people
to link from it to Wisconsin's site, which has some excellent information about
CWD."
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
***The first detection of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in Europe
Norway
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0764 for Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards
Singeltary Comment Submission
Saturday, April 16, 2016
APHIS [Docket No. APHIS-2016-0029] Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal
Health; Meeting May 2, 2016, and June 16, 2016 Singeltary Submission
Sunday, March 20, 2016
*** UPDATED MARCH 2016 URGENT Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly
03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission
Monday, April 11, 2016
*** DECLARATION OF EXTRAORDINARY EMERGENCY DUE TO A FOREIGN ANIMAL DISEASE
TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY TSE PRION CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD IN
THE UNITED STATES AND NORTH AMERICA ?
Saturday, April 02, 2016
TEXAS TAHC BREAKS IT'S SILENCE WITH TWO MORE CASES CWD CAPTIVE DEER
BRINGING TOTAL TO 10 CAPTIVES REPORTED TO DATE
Friday, February 26, 2016
TEXAS Hartley County Mule Deer Tests Positive for Chronic Wasting Disease
CWD TSE Prion
Friday, February 05, 2016
TEXAS NEW CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD CASE DISCOVERD AT CAPTIVE DEER
RELEASE SITE
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Arkansas First Phase of CWD sampling reveals 23 percent prevalence rate in
focal area With 82 Confirmed to Date
Friday, April 08, 2016
Arkansas AGFC Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion Confirms 23 Additional
Cases Total At 79 To Date
Friday, April 01, 2016
ARKANSAS CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION CASES EXPLODE BY 27 NEW
CASES WITH 50 CASES TOTAL TO DATE
WISCONSIN CWD CASES OUT OF CONTROL
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 Wisconsin CWD sample survey 2015 confirms 290
cases of Chronic Wasting Disease TSE Prion
KANSAS CWD CASES ALARMING
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 Kansas Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion 52
cases 2015 updated report 'ALARMING'
Tuesday, February 02, 2016
Illinois six out of 19 deer samples tested positive for CWD in the Oswego
zone of Kendall County
I could go on, for more see ;
Thursday, March 31, 2016
*** Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion Roundup USA 2016 ***
Thursday, April 07, 2016
What is the risk of chronic wasting disease being introduced into Great
Britain? An updated Qualitative Risk Assessment March 2016
Sheep and cattle may be exposed to CWD via common grazing areas with
affected deer but so far, appear to be poorly susceptible to mule deer CWD
(Sigurdson, 2008).
***In contrast, cattle are highly susceptible to white-tailed deer CWD and
mule deer CWD in experimental conditions but no natural CWD infections in cattle
have been reported (Sigurdson, 2008; Hamir et al., 2006). It is not known how
susceptible humans are to CWD but given that the prion can be present in muscle,
it is likely that humans have been exposed to the agent via consumption of
venison (Sigurdson, 2008). Initial experimental research, however, suggests that
human susceptibility to CWD is low and there may be a robust species barrier for
CWD transmission to humans (Sigurdson, 2008). It is apparent, though, that CWD
is affecting wild and farmed cervid populations in endemic areas with some deer
populations decreasing as a result.
snip...
For the purpose of the qualitative risk assessment developed here it is
necessary to estimate the probability that a 30-ml bottle of lure contains urine
from an infected deer. This requires an estimate of the proportion of deer herds
in the USA which are infected with CWD together with the within herd
prevalence.
The distribution map of CWD in US shows it is present mainly in central
states (Figure 1). However, Virginia in the east of the country has recorded
seven recent cases of CWD (Anon 2015a). Some US manufacturers claim to take
steps to prevent urine being taken from infected animals eg by sourcing from
farms where the deer are randomly tested for CWD (Anon 2015a). However, if
disease is already present and testing is not carried out regularly, captive
populations are not necessarily disease free (Strausser 2014). Urine-based deer
lures have been known to be collected from domestic white-tailed deer herds and
therefore there is a recognised risk. This is reflected by 6 US States which
have
14
banned the use of natural deer urine for lures, as the deer urine may be
sourced from CWD-endemic areas in the USA as well as from areas free of CWD. For
example, the US State of Virginia is banning the use of urine-based deer lures
on July 2015 and Vermont from 2016 due to the risk of spread of CWD. Alaska
banned their use in 2012 (Anon 2015a). Pennsylvania Game Commission has banned
urine-based deer lures and acknowledged that there is no way to detect their use
(Strausser 2014). On the basis of unpublished data (J. Manson, Pers. Comm.) it
appears that up to 50% of deer herds can be infected with 80-90% of animals
infected within some herds.
*** It is therefore assumed that probability that a 30-ml bottle of deer
urine lure imported from the USA is sources from an infected deer is
medium.
SNIP...
In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administration’s BSE Feed Regulation
(21 CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin)
from deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With
regards to feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may
not be used for any animal feed or feed ingredients. ***For elk and deer
considered at high risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not
enter the animal feed system. ***However, this recommendation is guidance and
not a requirement by law.
***Animals considered at high risk for CWD include:
***1) animals from areas declared to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD
eradication zones and
***2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month period prior to
slaughter were in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal.
***Therefore, in the USA, materials from cervids other than CWD positive
animals may be used in animal feed and feed ingredients for non-ruminants. The
amount of animal PAP that is of deer and/or elk origin imported from the USA to
GB cannot be determined, however, as it is not specified in TRACES. It may
constitute a small percentage of the very low tonnage of non-fish origin
processed animal proteins that were imported from US into GB.
*** Overall, therefore, it is considered there is a greater than negligible
risk that (non-ruminant) animal feed and pet food containing deer and/or elk
protein is imported into GB. There is uncertainty associated with this estimate
given the lack of data on the amount of deer and/or elk protein possibly being
imported in these products.
SNIP...
Summary and MORE HERE ;
What is the risk of chronic wasting disease being introduced into Great
Britain? An updated Qualitative Risk Assessment March 2016
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer
and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission ***UPDATED MARCH 2016***
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0321 Risk Assessment of Foodborne Illness Associated
with Pathogens from Produce Grown in Fields Amended with Untreated Biological
Soil Amendments of Animal Origin; Request for Comments, Scientific Data, and
Information Singeltary Submission
***SO, my question, why is it the OIE and other trade officials and policy
making there from, knowing that the USA and Canada, with not a clue about
Mexico, why is it that nobody has Declared an EXTRAORDINARY EMERGENCY DUE TO A
FOREIGN ANIMAL DISEASE TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY TSE PRION CHRONIC
WASTING DISEASE CWD IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORTH AMERICA ?
well, since no one else will, than I must.
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Declares a DECLARATION OF EXTRAORDINARY EMERGENCY
DUE TO A FOREIGN ANIMAL DISEASE TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY TSE
PRION CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORTH AMERICA.
The elephant in the room I was speaking of that we all have missed was the
feed, yes we all know of ruminant and non ruminant protein and risk factors
there from with TSE Prion disease, but we missed the rest of the feed i.e. FEED
GRAINS. YES, science has shown in the past, and now recently, the shedding of
the CWD TSE Prion into the environment is indeed a risk factor, and for all the
grains and such that goes into feed, even hay, hell, Norway does not require any
APHIS-Veterinary Services certification for the import of hay/straw. see for
yourself ;
Hay/Straw
Norway does not require any APHIS-Veterinary Services certification for the
import of hay/straw.
you add up all the other grains in feed, and then wonder about exposure to
the CWD TSE PRION from cervid and risk factor from the CWD there from via
shedding or right down to the soil these grains were grown in, and you have a
world of problems. see ;
Feed Grains Data: Yearbook Tables Created March 10, 2016 Updates of this
data, and data covering more years and countries, can be found at
U.S. Acreage, Production, Yield, and Farm Price Table 1--Corn, sorghum,
barley, and oats: Planted acreage, harvested acreage, production, yield, and
farm price World Production, Supply, and Disappearance
Table 2--Foreign coarse grains: Supply and disappearance
Table 3--Feed grains (corn, sorghum, barley, and oats): Supply and
disappearance U.S. Supply and Disappearance
Table 4--Corn: Supply and disappearance
Table 5--Sorghum: Supply and disappearance
Table 6--Barley: Supply and disappearance
Table 7--Oats: Supply and disappearance U.S. Production, Yield, and Stocks
Table 8--Hay: Production, harvested acreage, yield, and stocks Domestic and
International Prices
Table 9--Corn and sorghum: Average prices received by farmers, United
States
Table 10--Barley and oats: Average prices received by farmers, United
States
Table 11--Hay: Average prices received by farmers, United States
Table 12--Corn: Cash prices at principal markets
Table 13--Sorghum: Cash prices at principal markets
Table 14--Barley and oats: Cash prices at principal markets
Table 15--Feed-price ratios for livestock, poultry, and milk Table
16--Byproduct feeds: Average wholesale price, bulk, specified markets Table
17--Processed corn products: Quoted market prices Exports and Imports Table
18--U.S. corn and sorghum exports Table 19--U.S. barley and oats exports Table
20--U.S. corn and sorghum imports Table 21--U.S. barley and oats imports Table
22--U.S. corn and sorghum exports by selected destinations Table 23--U.S. barley
and oats exports by selected destinations Table 24--U.S. corn and sorghum
imports by selected sources Table 25--U.S. barley and oats imports by selected
sources Table 26--U.S. white corn exports by selected destinations Table
27--World coarse grain trade: Selected exporters and importers by commodity Rail
rates and shipments Table 28--Rail rates and grain shipments Processed feeds and
animal unit indexes Table 29--Processed feeds: Quantities fed and feed per
grain-consuming animal unit Table 30--Indexes of feed consuming animal units
Feed, seed, and industrial uses Table 31—Corn: Feed, seed, and industrial uses
Exports and imports for ethyl alcohol and brewers’ and distillers’ dregs and
waste Table 32—U.S. exports of ethyl alcohol by selected destinations Table
33—U.S. imports of ethyl alcohol by selected sources Table 34—U.S. exports of
brewers’ and distillers’ dregs and waste by selected commodities Table 35—U.S.
imports of brewers’ and distillers’ dregs and waste by selected sources Contact:
Thomas Capehart at tcapehart+A25@ers.usda.gov
‘’The statement you were concerned about was corrected to "One sorghum DDGS
out of 168 DG samples was contaminated with animal protein prohibited for use in
ruminant feed and was channeled to poultry feed."
From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 9:18 PM
To: parias@ksat.com
Subject: Re: TEXAS CONFIRMATION OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY BSE TSE
PRION IN ONE SAMPLE OF SORGHUM DDGS OUT OF 168 DG SAMPLES
***UDATED CORRECTION BY AUTHOR...SEE EMAIL TO ME...terry
From: Kyung-Min Lee Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:39 PM
To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. ; BSE-L@LISTS.AEGEE.ORG
Cc: CJD-L@LISTS.AEGEE.ORG ; cjdvoice@yahoogroups.com ;
bloodcjd@yahoogroups.com ; jcattanach@foodprotection.org ; cnc3@psu.edu ;
dloynachan@foodprotection.org ; lhovey@foodprotection.org ; Timothy J. Herrman
Subject: RE: TEXAS CONFIRMATION OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY BSE TSE
PRION IN ONE SAMPLE OF SORGHUM DDGS OUT OF 168 DG SAMPLES
Dear Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
Thank for your interest and concern about our published article entitled
“Evaluation of Selected Nutrients and Contaminants in Distillers Grains from
Ethanol Production in Texas”. I should apologize you and others that there were
some errors and misleading statements in this article due to inappropriate
terminology. The statement you were concerned about was corrected to "One
sorghum DDGS out of 168 DG samples was contaminated with animal protein
prohibited for use in ruminant feed and was channeled to poultry feed." We
requested the journal editor to correct some errors and the relevant statements,
or to withdraw the article from the journal.
Again I sincerely apologize for any confusion and inconvenience this may
cause. Thanks.
best wishes,
Kyung-Min
Kyung-Min Lee, Ph. D. Research Scientist Office of the Texas State
Chemist
Texas A&M AgriLife Research P.O. Box 3160, College Station, TX
77841-3160 Phone: 979-845-4113 (ext 132) Email:kml@otsc.tamu.edu Fax:
979-845-1389
snip...end...tss
my link corrected
Sunday, September 27, 2015
TEXAS CONFIRMATION OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY BSE TSE PRION IN ONE
SAMPLE OF SORGHUM DDGS OUT OF 168 DG SAMPLES
kind regards, terry
From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 8:30 PM
To: parias@ksat.com
Subject: Fw: TEXAS CONFIRMATION OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY BSE TSE
PRION IN ONE SAMPLE OF SORGHUM DDGS OUT OF 168 DG SAMPLES
From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 4:39 PM
To: BSE-L@LISTS.AEGEE.ORG
Cc: CJD-L@LISTS.AEGEE.ORG ; cjdvoice@yahoogroups.com ;
bloodcjd@yahoogroups.com ; jcattanach@foodprotection.org ; cnc3@psu.edu ;
dloynachan@foodprotection.org ; lhovey@foodprotection.org ; kml@otsc.tamu.edu
Subject: TEXAS CONFIRMATION OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY BSE TSE
PRION IN ONE SAMPLE OF SORGHUM DDGS OUT OF 168 DG SAMPLES
TEXAS One sorghum DDGS sample out of 168 DG samples was contaminated with
bovine spongiform encephalopathy, but the transmission route of the bovine
spongiform encephalopathy agent could not be clearly defined.
J Food Prot. 2015 Oct;78(10):1861-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-157.
Evaluation of Selected Nutrients and Contaminants in Distillers Grains from
Ethanol Production in Texas.
Lee KM1, Herrman TJ2. Author information 1Office of the Texas State
Chemist, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System,
College Station, Texas 77841, USA. kml@otsc.tamu.edu. 2Office of the Texas State
Chemist, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System,
College Station, Texas 77841, USA.
Abstract
This study evaluated distillers grain (DG) by-products produced in
different ethanol plants and supplemented in animal diets in Texas, based on
samples analyzed from 2008 to 2014. The samples were assessed for concentration,
occurrence, and prevalence of selected nutrients and contaminants. Protein and
sulfur contents of DG were largely different between corn and sorghum
by-products as well as wet distillers grain with solubles and dry distillers
grain with solubles (DDGS), indicating a significant effect of grain feedstock
and dry-grind process stream on DG composition and quality. Salmonella was
isolated in 4 DDGS samples out of a total of 157 DG samples, a percentage (2.5%)
that is much lower than the percentage of Salmonella-positive samples found in
other feed samples analyzed during the same period. A small amount of
virginiamycin residue was found in 24 corn DDGS, 1 corn wet distillers grain
with solubles, and 2 sorghum DDGS samples out of 242 samples in total. One
sorghum DDGS sample out of 168 DG samples was contaminated with bovine
spongiform encephalopathy, but the transmission route of the bovine spongiform
encephalopathy agent could not be clearly defined. The concentrations of
aflatoxin and fumonisin DG by-products averaged 3.4 μg/kg and 0.7 mg/kg,
respectively. Among contaminated corn DG samples, five DDGS samples for
aflatoxin contained a higher concentration than the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration action level for use in animal feed, whereas no sample for
fumonisin was found above the action level. The study results raised some
important issues associated with the quality and use of DG by-products,
suggesting several approaches and strategies for their effective and safe use as
a feed ingredient to promote animal and human health and welfare.
PMID: 26408135 [PubMed - in process]
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Declares a DECLARATION OF EXTRAORDINARY EMERGENCY
DUE TO A FOREIGN ANIMAL DISEASE TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY TSE
PRION CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORTH AMERICA.
it’s time someone steps up to the plate (OIE ...LMAO!), and declare an
extraordinary emergency for foreign animal disease due to Chronic Wasting
Disease or Cervid Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE Prion disease from the United
States of America, Canada, and Mexico i.e. North America, before this damn
disease is spread to hell and back, and you can just throw in there BSE and
Scrapie just for grins. ...and I ain’t grinning Sad smile OIE, you have
floundered too long with mad cow type TSE Prion disease...
Saturday, April 9, 2016
The Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NVI, 2016) has reported a case of prion
disease Cervid Spongiform Encephalopathy detected in free ranging wild reindeer
(Rangifer tarandus tarandus)
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
NORTH AMERICA IS ALREADY RESPONSIBLE FOR SHIPPING CWD TO KOREA, HOW MANY
MORE COUNTRIES MUST FALL DUE TO THE OIE AND THE USDA $$$
Friday, May 13, 2011
Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) outbreaks and surveillance program in the
Republic of Korea
PL1
Using in vitro prion replication for high sensitive detection of prions and
prionlike proteins and for understanding mechanisms of transmission.
Claudio Soto
Mitchell Center for Alzheimer's diseases and related Brain disorders,
Department of Neurology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston.
Prion and prion-like proteins are misfolded protein aggregates with the
ability to selfpropagate to spread disease between cells, organs and in some
cases across individuals. I n T r a n s m i s s i b l e s p o n g i f o r m
encephalopathies (TSEs), prions are mostly composed by a misfolded form of the
prion protein (PrPSc), which propagates by transmitting its misfolding to the
normal prion protein (PrPC). The availability of a procedure to replicate prions
in the laboratory may be important to study the mechanism of prion and
prion-like spreading and to develop high sensitive detection of small quantities
of misfolded proteins in biological fluids, tissues and environmental samples.
Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification (PMCA) is a simple, fast and efficient
methodology to mimic prion replication in the test tube. PMCA is a platform
technology that may enable amplification of any prion-like misfolded protein
aggregating through a seeding/nucleation process. In TSEs, PMCA is able to
detect the equivalent of one single molecule of infectious PrPSc and propagate
prions that maintain high infectivity, strain properties and species
specificity. Using PMCA we have been able to detect PrPSc in blood and urine of
experimentally infected animals and humans affected by vCJD with high
sensitivity and specificity. Recently, we have expanded the principles of PMCA
to amplify amyloid-beta (Aβ) and alphasynuclein (α-syn) aggregates implicated in
Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, respectively. Experiments are ongoing to
study the utility of this technology to detect Aβ and α-syn aggregates in
samples of CSF and blood from patients affected by these diseases.
=========================
***Recently, we have been using PMCA to study the role of environmental
prion contamination on the horizontal spreading of TSEs. These experiments have
focused on the study of the interaction of prions with plants and
environmentally relevant surfaces. Our results show that plants (both leaves and
roots) bind tightly to prions present in brain extracts and excreta (urine and
feces) and retain even small quantities of PrPSc for long periods of time.
Strikingly, ingestion of prioncontaminated leaves and roots produced disease
with a 100% attack rate and an incubation period not substantially longer than
feeding animals directly with scrapie brain homogenate. Furthermore, plants can
uptake prions from contaminated soil and transport them to different parts of
the plant tissue (stem and leaves). Similarly, prions bind tightly to a variety
of environmentally relevant surfaces, including stones, wood, metals, plastic,
glass, cement, etc. Prion contaminated surfaces efficiently transmit prion
disease when these materials were directly injected into the brain of animals
and strikingly when the contaminated surfaces were just placed in the animal
cage. These findings demonstrate that environmental materials can efficiently
bind infectious prions and act as carriers of infectivity, suggesting that they
may play an important role in the horizontal transmission of the disease.
========================
Since its invention 13 years ago, PMCA has helped to answer fundamental
questions of prion propagation and has broad applications in research areas
including the food industry, blood bank safety and human and veterinary disease
diagnosis.
see ;
Potential role of soil properties in the spread of CWD in western
Canada
Alsu Kuznetsova, Debbie McKenzie, Pamela Banser, Tariq Siddique & Judd
M. Aiken
Estimating Prion Adsorption Capacity of Soil by BioAssay of Subtracted
Infectivity from Complex Solutions (BASICS)
Estimating Prion Adsorption Capacity of Soil by BioAssay of Subtracted
Infectivity from Complex Solutions (BASICS) A. Christy Wyckoff, Krista L.
Lockwood, Crystal Meyerett-Reid, Brady A. Michel, Heather Bender, Kurt C.
VerCauteren, Mark D. Zabel PLOS x Published: March 4, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058630
Behavior of Prions in the Environment: Implications for Prion Biology
Shannon L. Bartelt-Hunt1*, Jason C. Bartz2*
Prion Amplification and Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Refine Detection of
Prion Infection A. Christy Wyckoff1, 2 n1 , Nathan Galloway3 n1 , Crystal
Meyerett-Reid1 , Jenny Powers4 , Terry Spraker1 , Ryan J. Monello4 , Bruce
Pulford1 , Margaret Wild4 , Michael Antolin3 , Kurt VerCauteren2 […] & Mark
Zabel1 - Show fewer authors Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 8358 (2015)
doi:10.1038/srep08358 Download Citation
Molecular ecology Proteins Statistics Received: 27 June 2014
CELL REPORTS
Report
Grass Plants Bind, Retain, Uptake, and Transport Infectious Prions
PRION UPDATE VIA VEGETABLE PLANTS FROM THE SOIL
56. Members considered that there is no evidence that crops grown on the
land which received composted excreta from BSE-challenged animals pose a TSE
risk to humans or animals. One member suggested that, as some of these animals
are orally challenged with high doses of BSE-infected materials, and the
distribution of infectivity in the digestive system is not completely
understood, it might be premature to conclude that there is no infective agent
in the manure.
Furthermore, an unpublished study had indicated low level absorption of PrP
from soil by tomato plants although it should be noted that this study had not
been repeated. Details of this work would be sent to the SEAC Secretary. Dr
Matthews explained that most of the manure from animals challenged with high
doses of BSE had already been composted and used for coppicing. Members agreed
that the risks from disposal of residual manure from experimental animals would
be much less than historic risks of on farm contamination from naturally
infected animals at the height of the BSE epidemic. ...SNIP...END
SRM are certain cattle tissues capable of transmitting BSE. There is no
human health risk assessment to indicate the absence of human health concerns
associated with use of composted SRM domestically. To date, scientific evidence
has not been able to demonstrate that composting destroys prions. Although
domestic use would pose a negligible risk to livestock, there is a potential
risk to humans via direct ingestion of the compost or of compost particles
adhered to skin or plant material (e.g. carrots). Another potential route of
exposure is by ingestion of prions that have been taken up by plants. It has
been proven that bacteria are readily taken up by some plants (e.g. E. coli in
lettuce) thus the uptake of prions by plants cannot be precluded or dismissed at
this time. As a science-based regulator, the CFIA cannot change the policy on
this issue without a risk assessment demonstrating that the use of composted SRM
poses an acceptable risk to humans.
The BSE Inquiry / Statement No 19B (supplementary) Dr Alan Colchester
Issued 06/08/1999 (not scheduled to give oral evidence) SECOND STATEMENT TO THE
BSE INQUIRY Dr A Colchester BA BM BCh PhD FRCP Reader in Neurosciences &
Computing, University of Kent at Canterbury; Consultant Neurologist, Guy’s
Hospital London and William Harvey Hospital Ashford April 1999
snip...
88. Natural decay: Infectivity persists for a long time in the environment.
A study by Palsson in 1979 showed how scrapie was contracted by healthy sheep,
after they had grazed on land which had previously been grazed by
scrapie-infected sheep, even though the land had lain fallow for three years
before the healthy sheep were introduced. Brown also quoted an early experiment
of his own (1991), where he had buried scrapie-infected hamster brain and found
that he could still detect substantial infectivity three years later near where
the material had been placed. 89. Potential environmental routes of infection:
Brown discusses the various possible scenarios, including surface or subsurface
deposits of TSE-contaminated material, which would lead to a build-up of
long-lasting infectivity. Birds feeding on animal remains (such as gulls
visiting landfill sites) could disperse infectivity. Other animals could become
vectors if they later grazed on contaminated land. "A further question concerns
the risk of contamination of the surrounding water table or even surface water
channels, by effluents and discarded solid wastes from treatment plants. A
reasonable conclusion is that there is a potential for human infection to result
from environmental contamination by BSE-infected tissue residues. The potential
cannot be quantified because of the huge numbers of uncertainties and
assumptions that attend each stage of the disposal process". These comments,
from a long established authority on TSEs, closely echo my own statements which
were based on a recent examination of all the evidence. 90. Susceptibility: It
is likely that transmissibility of the disease to humans in vivo is probably
low, because sheep that die from scrapie and cattle that die from BSE are
probably a small fraction of the exposed population. However, no definitive data
are available.
91. Recommendations for disposal procedures: Brown recommends that material
which is actually or potentially contaminated by BSE should be: 1) exposed to
caustic soda; 2) thoroughly incinerated under carefully inspected conditions;
and 3) that any residue should be buried in landfill, to a depth which would
minimise any subsequent animal or human exposure, in areas that would not
intersect with any potable water-table source.
92. This review and recommendations from Brown have particular importance.
Brown is one of the world's foremost authorities on TSEs and is a senior
researcher in the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). It is notable that
such a respected authority is forthright in acknowledging the existence of
potential risks, and in identifying the appropriate measures necessary to
safeguard public health. Paper by SM Cousens, L Linsell, PG Smith, Dr M
Chandrakumar, JW Wilesmith, RSG Knight, M Zeidler, G Stewart, RG Will,
"Geographical distribution of variant CJD in the UK (excluding Northern
Ireland)". Lancet 353:18-21, 2 nd January 1999 93. The above paper {Appendix 41
(02/01/99)} (J/L/353/18) examined the possibility that patients with vCJD
(variant CJD) might live closer to rendering factories than would be expected by
chance. All 26 cases of vCJD in the UK with onset up to 31 st August 1998 were
studied. The incubation period of vCJD is not known but by analogy with other
human TSEs could lie within the range 5-25 years. If vCJD had arisen by exposure
to rendering products, such exposure might plausibly have occurred 8-10 years
before the onset of symptoms. The authors were able to obtain the addresses of
all rendering plants in the UK which were in production in 1988. For each case
of vCJD, the distance from the place of residence on 1st January 1998 to the
nearest rendering plant was calculated
snip...
Friday, February 08, 2013
*** Behavior of Prions in the Environment: Implications for Prion Biology
Wednesday, December 16, 2015
Objects in contact with classical scrapie sheep act as a reservoir for
scrapie transmission
Objects in contact with classical scrapie sheep act as a reservoir for
scrapie transmission
Timm Konold1*, Stephen A. C. Hawkins2, Lisa C. Thurston3, Ben C. Maddison4,
Kevin C. Gough5, Anthony Duarte1 and Hugh A. Simmons1
1 Animal Sciences Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge,
Addlestone, UK, 2 Pathology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency
Weybridge, Addlestone, UK, 3 Surveillance and Laboratory Services, Animal and
Plant Health Agency Penrith, Penrith, UK, 4 ADAS UK, School of Veterinary
Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK, 5 School
of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington,
UK
Classical scrapie is an environmentally transmissible prion disease of
sheep and goats. Prions can persist and remain potentially infectious in the
environment for many years and thus pose a risk of infecting animals after
re-stocking. In vitro studies using serial protein misfolding cyclic
amplification (sPMCA) have suggested that objects on a scrapie affected sheep
farm could contribute to disease transmission. This in vivo study aimed to
determine the role of field furniture (water troughs, feeding troughs, fencing,
and other objects that sheep may rub against) used by a scrapie-infected sheep
flock as a vector for disease transmission to scrapie-free lambs with the prion
protein genotype VRQ/VRQ, which is associated with high susceptibility to
classical scrapie. When the field furniture was placed in clean accommodation,
sheep became infected when exposed to either a water trough (four out of five)
or to objects used for rubbing (four out of seven). This field furniture had
been used by the scrapie-infected flock 8 weeks earlier and had previously been
shown to harbor scrapie prions by sPMCA. Sheep also became infected (20 out of
23) through exposure to contaminated field furniture placed within pasture not
used by scrapie-infected sheep for 40 months, even though swabs from this
furniture tested negative by PMCA. This infection rate decreased (1 out of 12)
on the same paddock after replacement with clean field furniture. Twelve grazing
sheep exposed to field furniture not in contact with scrapie-infected sheep for
18 months remained scrapie free. The findings of this study highlight the role
of field furniture used by scrapie-infected sheep to act as a reservoir for
disease re-introduction although infectivity declines considerably if the field
furniture has not been in contact with scrapie-infected sheep for several
months. PMCA may not be as sensitive as VRQ/VRQ sheep to test for environmental
contamination.
snip...
Discussion
Classical scrapie is an environmentally transmissible disease because it
has been reported in naïve, supposedly previously unexposed sheep placed in
pastures formerly occupied by scrapie-infected sheep (4, 19, 20). Although the
vector for disease transmission is not known, soil is likely to be an important
reservoir for prions (2) where – based on studies in rodents – prions can adhere
to minerals as a biologically active form (21) and remain infectious for more
than 2 years (22). Similarly, chronic wasting disease (CWD) has re-occurred in
mule deer housed in paddocks used by infected deer 2 years earlier, which was
assumed to be through foraging and soil consumption (23).
Our study suggested that the risk of acquiring scrapie infection was
greater through exposure to contaminated wooden, plastic, and metal surfaces via
water or food troughs, fencing, and hurdles than through grazing. Drinking from
a water trough used by the scrapie flock was sufficient to cause infection in
sheep in a clean building. Exposure to fences and other objects used for rubbing
also led to infection, which supported the hypothesis that skin may be a vector
for disease transmission (9). The risk of these objects to cause infection was
further demonstrated when 87% of 23 sheep presented with PrPSc in lymphoid
tissue after grazing on one of the paddocks, which contained metal hurdles, a
metal lamb creep and a water trough in contact with the scrapie flock up to 8
weeks earlier, whereas no infection had been demonstrated previously in sheep
grazing on this paddock, when equipped with new fencing and field furniture.
When the contaminated furniture and fencing were removed, the infection rate
dropped significantly to 8% of 12 sheep, with soil of the paddock as the most
likely source of infection caused by shedding of prions from the
scrapie-infected sheep in this paddock up to a week earlier.
This study also indicated that the level of contamination of field
furniture sufficient to cause infection was dependent on two factors: stage of
incubation period and time of last use by scrapie-infected sheep. Drinking from
a water trough that had been used by scrapie sheep in the predominantly
pre-clinical phase did not appear to cause infection, whereas infection was
shown in sheep drinking from the water trough used by scrapie sheep in the later
stage of the disease. It is possible that contamination occurred through
shedding of prions in saliva, which may have contaminated the surface of the
water trough and subsequently the water when it was refilled. Contamination
appeared to be sufficient to cause infection only if the trough was in contact
with sheep that included clinical cases. Indeed, there is an increased risk of
bodily fluid infectivity with disease progression in scrapie (24) and CWD (25)
based on PrPSc detection by sPMCA. Although ultraviolet light and heat under
natural conditions do not inactivate prions (26), furniture in contact with the
scrapie flock, which was assumed to be sufficiently contaminated to cause
infection, did not act as vector for disease if not used for 18 months, which
suggest that the weathering process alone was sufficient to inactivate prions.
PrPSc detection by sPMCA is increasingly used as a surrogate for
infectivity measurements by bioassay in sheep or mice. In this reported study,
however, the levels of PrPSc present in the environment were below the limit of
detection of the sPMCA method, yet were still sufficient to cause infection of
in-contact animals. In the present study, the outdoor objects were removed from
the infected flock 8 weeks prior to sampling and were positive by sPMCA at very
low levels (2 out of 37 reactions). As this sPMCA assay also yielded 2 positive
reactions out of 139 in samples from the scrapie-free farm, the sPMCA assay
could not detect PrPSc on any of the objects above the background of the assay.
False positive reactions with sPMCA at a low frequency associated with de novo
formation of infectious prions have been reported (27, 28). This is in contrast
to our previous study where we demonstrated that outdoor objects that had been
in contact with the scrapie-infected flock up to 20 days prior to sampling
harbored PrPSc that was detectable by sPMCA analysis [4 out of 15 reactions
(12)] and was significantly more positive by the assay compared to analogous
samples from the scrapie-free farm. This discrepancy could be due to the use of
a different sPMCA substrate between the studies that may alter the efficiency of
amplification of the environmental PrPSc. In addition, the present study had a
longer timeframe between the objects being in contact with the infected flock
and sampling, which may affect the levels of extractable PrPSc. Alternatively,
there may be potentially patchy contamination of this furniture with PrPSc,
which may have been missed by swabbing. The failure of sPMCA to detect
CWD-associated PrP in saliva from clinically affected deer despite confirmation
of infectivity in saliva-inoculated transgenic mice was associated with as yet
unidentified inhibitors in saliva (29), and it is possible that the sensitivity
of sPMCA is affected by other substances in the tested material. In addition,
sampling of amplifiable PrPSc and subsequent detection by sPMCA may be more
difficult from furniture exposed to weather, which is supported by the
observation that PrPSc was detected by sPMCA more frequently in indoor than
outdoor furniture (12). A recent experimental study has demonstrated that
repeated cycles of drying and wetting of prion-contaminated soil, equivalent to
what is expected under natural weathering conditions, could reduce PMCA
amplification efficiency and extend the incubation period in hamsters inoculated
with soil samples (30). This seems to apply also to this study even though the
reduction in infectivity was more dramatic in the sPMCA assays than in the sheep
model. Sheep were not kept until clinical end-point, which would have enabled us
to compare incubation periods, but the lack of infection in sheep exposed to
furniture that had not been in contact with scrapie sheep for a longer time
period supports the hypothesis that prion degradation and subsequent loss of
infectivity occurs even under natural conditions.
In conclusion, the results in the current study indicate that removal of
furniture that had been in contact with scrapie-infected animals should be
recommended, particularly since cleaning and decontamination may not effectively
remove scrapie infectivity (31), even though infectivity declines considerably
if the pasture and the field furniture have not been in contact with
scrapie-infected sheep for several months. As sPMCA failed to detect PrPSc in
furniture that was subjected to weathering, even though exposure led to
infection in sheep, this method may not always be reliable in predicting the
risk of scrapie infection through environmental contamination. These results
suggest that the VRQ/VRQ sheep model may be more sensitive than sPMCA for the
detection of environmentally associated scrapie, and suggest that extremely low
levels of scrapie contamination are able to cause infection in susceptible sheep
genotypes.
Keywords: classical scrapie, prion, transmissible spongiform
encephalopathy, sheep, field furniture, reservoir, serial protein misfolding
cyclic amplification
Wednesday, December 16, 2015
*** Objects in contact with classical scrapie sheep act as a reservoir for
scrapie transmission ***
Circulation of prions within dust on a scrapie affected farm
Kevin C Gough1, Claire A Baker2, Hugh A Simmons3, Steve A Hawkins3 and Ben
C Maddison2*
Abstract
Prion diseases are fatal neurological disorders that affect humans and
animals. Scrapie of sheep/goats and Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) of deer/elk
are contagious prion diseases where environmental reservoirs have a direct link
to the transmission of disease. Using protein misfolding cyclic amplification we
demonstrate that scrapie PrPSc can be detected within circulating dusts that are
present on a farm that is naturally contaminated with sheep scrapie. The
presence of infectious scrapie within airborne dusts may represent a possible
route of infection and illustrates the difficulties that may be associated with
the effective decontamination of such scrapie affected premises.
snip...
Discussion
We present biochemical data illustrating the airborne movement of scrapie
containing material within a contaminated farm environment. We were able to
detect scrapie PrPSc within extracts from dusts collected over a 70 day period,
in the absence of any sheep activity. We were also able to detect scrapie PrPSc
within dusts collected within pasture at 30 m but not at 60 m distance away from
the scrapie contaminated buildings, suggesting that the chance of contamination
of pasture by scrapie contaminated dusts decreases with distance from
contaminated farm buildings. PrPSc amplification by sPMCA has been shown to
correlate with infectivity and amplified products have been shown to be
infectious [14,15]. These experiments illustrate the potential for low dose
scrapie infectivity to be present within such samples. We estimate low ng levels
of scrapie positive brain equivalent were deposited per m2 over 70 days, in a
barn previously occupied by sheep affected with scrapie. This movement of dusts
and the accumulation of low levels of scrapie infectivity within this
environment may in part explain previous observations where despite stringent
pen decontamination regimens healthy lambs still became scrapie infected after
apparent exposure from their environment alone [16]. The presence of sPMCA
seeding activity and by inference, infectious prions within dusts, and their
potential for airborne dissemination is highly novel and may have implications
for the spread of scrapie within infected premises. The low level circulation
and accumulation of scrapie prion containing dust material within the farm
environment will likely impede the efficient decontamination of such scrapie
contaminated buildings unless all possible reservoirs of dust are removed.
Scrapie containing dusts could possibly infect animals during feeding and
drinking, and respiratory and conjunctival routes may also be involved. It has
been demonstrated that scrapie can be efficiently transmitted via the nasal
route in sheep [17], as is also the case for CWD in both murine models and in
white tailed deer [18-20].
The sources of dust borne prions are unknown but it seems reasonable to
assume that faecal, urine, skin, parturient material and saliva-derived prions
may contribute to this mobile environmental reservoir of infectivity. This work
highlights a possible transmission route for scrapie within the farm
environment, and this is likely to be paralleled in CWD which shows strong
similarities with scrapie in terms of prion dissemination and disease
transmission. The data indicate that the presence of scrapie prions in dust is
likely to make the control of these diseases a considerable challenge.
Thursday, April 07, 2016
What is the risk of chronic wasting disease being introduced into Great
Britain? An updated Qualitative Risk Assessment March 2016
Sheep and cattle may be exposed to CWD via common grazing areas with
affected deer but so far, appear to be poorly susceptible to mule deer CWD
(Sigurdson, 2008).
***In contrast, cattle are highly susceptible to white-tailed deer CWD and
mule deer CWD in experimental conditions but no natural CWD infections in cattle
have been reported (Sigurdson, 2008; Hamir et al., 2006). It is not known how
susceptible humans are to CWD but given that the prion can be present in muscle,
it is likely that humans have been exposed to the agent via consumption of
venison (Sigurdson, 2008). Initial experimental research, however, suggests that
human susceptibility to CWD is low and there may be a robust species barrier for
CWD transmission to humans (Sigurdson, 2008). It is apparent, though, that CWD
is affecting wild and farmed cervid populations in endemic areas with some deer
populations decreasing as a result.
snip...
For the purpose of the qualitative risk assessment developed here it is
necessary to estimate the probability that a 30-ml bottle of lure contains urine
from an infected deer. This requires an estimate of the proportion of deer herds
in the USA which are infected with CWD together with the within herd
prevalence.
The distribution map of CWD in US shows it is present mainly in central
states (Figure 1). However, Virginia in the east of the country has recorded
seven recent cases of CWD (Anon 2015a). Some US manufacturers claim to take
steps to prevent urine being taken from infected animals eg by sourcing from
farms where the deer are randomly tested for CWD (Anon 2015a). However, if
disease is already present and testing is not carried out regularly, captive
populations are not necessarily disease free (Strausser 2014). Urine-based deer
lures have been known to be collected from domestic white-tailed deer herds and
therefore there is a recognised risk. This is reflected by 6 US States which
have
14
banned the use of natural deer urine for lures, as the deer urine may be
sourced from CWD-endemic areas in the USA as well as from areas free of CWD. For
example, the US State of Virginia is banning the use of urine-based deer lures
on July 2015 and Vermont from 2016 due to the risk of spread of CWD. Alaska
banned their use in 2012 (Anon 2015a). Pennsylvania Game Commission has banned
urine-based deer lures and acknowledged that there is no way to detect their use
(Strausser 2014). On the basis of unpublished data (J. Manson, Pers. Comm.) it
appears that up to 50% of deer herds can be infected with 80-90% of animals
infected within some herds.
*** It is therefore assumed that probability that a 30-ml bottle of deer
urine lure imported from the USA is sources from an infected deer is
medium.
SNIP...
In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administration’s BSE Feed Regulation
(21 CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin)
from deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With
regards to feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may
not be used for any animal feed or feed ingredients. ***For elk and deer
considered at high risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not
enter the animal feed system. ***However, this recommendation is guidance and
not a requirement by law.
***Animals considered at high risk for CWD include:
***1) animals from areas declared to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD
eradication zones and
***2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month period prior to
slaughter were in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal.
***Therefore, in the USA, materials from cervids other than CWD positive
animals may be used in animal feed and feed ingredients for non-ruminants. The
amount of animal PAP that is of deer and/or elk origin imported from the USA to
GB cannot be determined, however, as it is not specified in TRACES. It may
constitute a small percentage of the very low tonnage of non-fish origin
processed animal proteins that were imported from US into GB.
*** Overall, therefore, it is considered there is a greater than negligible
risk that (non-ruminant) animal feed and pet food containing deer and/or elk
protein is imported into GB. There is uncertainty associated with this estimate
given the lack of data on the amount of deer and/or elk protein possibly being
imported in these products.
SNIP...
Summary and MORE HERE ;
What is the risk of chronic wasting disease being introduced into Great
Britain? An updated Qualitative Risk Assessment March 2016
Saturday, January 31, 2015
European red deer (Cervus elaphus elaphus) are susceptible to Bovine
Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE by Oral Alimentary route
I strenuously once again urge the FDA and its industry constituents, to
make it MANDATORY that all ruminant feed be banned to all ruminants, and this
should include all cervids as soon as possible for the following
reasons...
======
In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administrations BSE Feed Regulation (21
CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin) from
deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With regards to
feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may not be used
for any animal feed or feed ingredients. For elk and deer considered at high
risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not enter the animal feed
system.
***However, this recommendation is guidance and not a requirement by law.
======
31 Jan 2015 at 20:14 GMT
*** Ruminant feed ban for cervids in the United States? ***
31 Jan 2015 at 20:14 GMT
see Singeltary comment ;
Monday, March 28, 2016
National Scrapie Eradication Program February 2016 Monthly Report
Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer
and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission
Greetings again FDA and Mr. Pritchett et al,
I would kindly like to comment on ;
Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer
and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission
#158
Guidance for Industry
Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed
This version of the guidance replaces the version made available
September15, 2003.
This document has been revised to update the docket number, contact
information, and standard disclosures. Submit comments on this guidance at any
time.
Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments
should be identified with the Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186).
For further information regarding this guidance, contact Burt Pritchett,
Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-222), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, 240-402-6276, E-mail:
burt.pritchett@fda.hhs.gov.
Additional copies of this guidance document may be requested from the
Policy and Regulations Staff (HFV-6), Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and
Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, and may be viewed
on the Internet at either http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/default.htm
or http://www.regulations.gov.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration
Center for Veterinary Medicine March 2016
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
2
Guidance for Industry Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed
This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights
for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA office
responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page.
I. Introduction
Under FDA’s BSE feed regulation (21 CFR 589.2000) most material from deer
and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. This guidance
document describes FDA’s recommendations regarding the use in all animal feed of
all material from deer and elk that are positive for Chronic Wasting Disease
(CWD) or are considered at high risk for CWD. The potential risks from CWD to
humans or non-cervid animals such as poultry and swine are not well understood.
However, because of recent recognition that CWD is spreading rapidly in
white-tailed deer, and because CWD’s route of transmission is poorly understood,
FDA is making recommendations regarding the use in animal feed of rendered
materials from deer and elk that are CWD-positive or that are at high risk for
CWD.
In general, FDA’s guidance documents do not establish legally enforceable
responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a
topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory
or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency
guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.
II. Background
CWD is a neurological (brain) disease of farmed and wild deer and elk that
belong in the animal family cervidae (cervids). Only deer and elk are known to
be susceptible to CWD by natural transmission. The disease has been found in
farmed and wild mule deer, white-tailed deer, North American elk, and in farmed
black-tailed deer. CWD belongs to a family of animal and human diseases called
transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). These include bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or “mad cow” disease) in cattle; scrapie in sheep
and goats; and classical and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseases (CJD and vCJD)
in humans. There is no known treatment for these diseases, and there is no
vaccine to prevent them. In addition, although validated postmortem diagnostic
tests are available, there are no validated diagnostic tests for CWD that can be
used to test for the disease in live animals.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
III. Use in animal feed of material from CWD-positive deer and elk
Material from CWD-positive animals may not be used in any animal feed or
feed ingredients. Pursuant to Sec. 402(a)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, animal feed and feed ingredients containing material from a
CWD-positive animal would be considered adulterated. FDA recommends that any
such adulterated feed or feed ingredients be recalled or otherwise removed from
the marketplace.
IV. Use in animal feed of material from deer and elk considered at high
risk for CWD Deer and elk considered at high risk for CWD include: (1) animals
from areas declared by State officials to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD
eradication zones; and (2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month
period immediately before the time of slaughter were in a captive herd that
contained a CWD-positive animal.
FDA recommends that materials from deer and elk considered at high risk for
CWD no longer be entered into the animal feed system. Under present
circumstances, FDA is not recommending that feed made from deer and elk from a
non-endemic area be recalled if a State later declares the area endemic for CWD
or a CWD eradication zone. In addition, at this time, FDA is not recommending
that feed made from deer and elk believed to be from a captive herd that
contained no CWD-positive animals be recalled if that herd is subsequently found
to contain a CWD-positive animal.
V. Use in animal feed of material from deer and elk NOT considered at high
risk for CWD FDA continues to consider materials from deer and elk NOT
considered at high risk for CWD to be acceptable for use in NON-RUMINANT animal
feeds in accordance with current agency regulations, 21 CFR 589.2000. Deer and
elk not considered at high risk include: (1) deer and elk from areas not
declared by State officials to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD eradication
zones; and (2) deer and elk that were not at some time during the 60-month
period immediately before the time of slaughter in a captive herd that contained
a CWD-positive animal.
3
Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer
and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission
Greetings again FDA and Mr. Pritchett et al,
MY comments and source reference of sound science on this very important
issue are as follows ;
Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer
and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission
I kindly wish to once again submit to Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly
03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed.
Thank you kindly for allowing me to comment again, ...and again...and
again, on a topic so important, why it is ‘NON-BINDING’ is beyond me.
this should have been finalized and made ‘BINDING’ or MANDATORY OVER A
DECADE AGO.
but here lay the problem, once made ‘BINDING’ or ‘MANDATORY’, it is still
nothing but ink on paper.
we have had a mad cow feed ban in place since August 1997, and since then,
literally 100s of millions of pounds BANNED MAD COW FEED has been sent out to
commerce and fed out (see reference materials).
ENFORCEMENT OF SAID BINDING REGULATIONS HAS FAILED US TOO MANY TIMES.
so, in my opinion, any non-binding or voluntary regulations will not work,
and to state further, ‘BINDING’ or MANDATORY regulations will not work unless
enforced.
with that said, we know that Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion easily
transmits to other cervid through the oral route.
the old transmission studies of BSE TSE floored scientist once they figured
out what they had, and please don’t forget about those mink that were fed 95%+
dead stock downer cow, that all came down with TME. please see ;
It is clear that the designing scientists must also have shared Mr Bradleys
surprise at the results because all the dose levels right down to 1 gram
triggered infection.
it is clear that the designing scientists must have also shared Mr Bradleys
surprise at the results because all the dose levels right down to 1 gram
triggered infection.
Evidence That Transmissible Mink Encephalopathy Results from Feeding
Infected Cattle
Over the next 8-10 weeks, approximately 40% of all the adult mink on the
farm died from TME.
snip...
The rancher was a ''dead stock'' feeder using mostly (>95%) downer or
dead dairy cattle...
*** PLEASE SEE THIS URGENT UPDATE ON CWD AND FEED ANIMAL PROTEIN ***
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer
and Elk in Animal Feed ***UPDATED MARCH 2016*** Singeltary Submission
O.05: Transmission of prions to primates after extended silent incubation
periods: Implications for BSE and scrapie risk assessment in human populations
Emmanuel Comoy, Jacqueline Mikol, Valerie Durand, Sophie Luccantoni,
Evelyne Correia, Nathalie Lescoutra, Capucine Dehen, and Jean-Philippe Deslys
Atomic Energy Commission; Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
Prion diseases (PD) are the unique neurodegenerative proteinopathies
reputed to be transmissible under field conditions since decades. The
transmission of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) to humans evidenced that
an animal PD might be zoonotic under appropriate conditions. Contrarily, in the
absence of obvious (epidemiological or experimental) elements supporting a
transmission or genetic predispositions, PD, like the other proteinopathies, are
reputed to occur spontaneously (atpical animal prion strains, sporadic CJD
summing 80% of human prion cases). Non-human primate models provided the first
evidences supporting the transmissibiity of human prion strains and the zoonotic
potential of BSE. Among them, cynomolgus macaques brought major information for
BSE risk assessment for human health (Chen, 2014), according to their
phylogenetic proximity to humans and extended lifetime. We used this model to
assess the zoonotic potential of other animal PD from bovine, ovine and cervid
origins even after very long silent incubation periods.
*** We recently observed the direct transmission of a natural classical
scrapie isolate to macaque after a 10-year silent incubation period,
***with features similar to some reported for human cases of sporadic CJD,
albeit requiring fourfold long incubation than BSE. Scrapie, as recently evoked
in humanized mice (Cassard, 2014),
***is the third potentially zoonotic PD (with BSE and L-type BSE),
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases.
We will present an updated panorama of our different transmission studies
and discuss the implications of such extended incubation periods on risk
assessment of animal PD for human health.
===============
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases***
===============
Research Project: TRANSMISSION, DIFFERENTIATION, AND PATHOBIOLOGY OF
TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHIES
*** Title: Transmission of scrapie prions to primate after an extended
silent incubation period
Authors
item Comoy, Emmanuel - item Mikol, Jacqueline - item Luccantoni-Freire,
Sophie - item Correia, Evelyne - item Lescoutra-Etchegaray, Nathalie - item
Durand, Valérie - item Dehen, Capucine - item Andreoletti, Olivier - item
Casalone, Cristina - item Richt, Juergen item Greenlee, Justin item Baron,
Thierry - item Benestad, Sylvie - item Hills, Bob - item Brown, Paul - item
Deslys, Jean-Philippe -
Submitted to: Scientific Reports Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: May 28, 2015 Publication Date: June 30, 2015
Citation: Comoy, E.E., Mikol, J., Luccantoni-Freire, S., Correia, E.,
Lescoutra-Etchegaray, N., Durand, V., Dehen, C., Andreoletti, O., Casalone, C.,
Richt, J.A., Greenlee, J.J., Baron, T., Benestad, S., Brown, P., Deslys, J.
2015. Transmission of scrapie prions to primate after an extended silent
incubation period. Scientific Reports. 5:11573.
Interpretive Summary: The transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (also
called prion diseases) are fatal neurodegenerative diseases that affect animals
and humans. The agent of prion diseases is a misfolded form of the prion protein
that is resistant to breakdown by the host cells. Since all mammals express
prion protein on the surface of various cells such as neurons, all mammals are,
in theory, capable of replicating prion diseases. One example of a prion
disease, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE; also called mad cow disease),
has been shown to infect cattle, sheep, exotic undulates, cats, non-human
primates, and humans when the new host is exposed to feeds or foods contaminated
with the disease agent. The purpose of this study was to test whether non-human
primates (cynomologous macaque) are susceptible to the agent of sheep scrapie.
***After an incubation period of approximately 10 years a macaque developed
progressive clinical signs suggestive of neurologic disease.
***Upon postmortem examination and microscopic examination of tissues,
there was a widespread distribution of lesions consistent with a transmissible
spongiform encephalopathy.
***This information will have a scientific impact since it is the first
study that demonstrates the transmission of scrapie to a non-human primate with
a close genetic relationship to humans.
***This information is especially useful to regulatory officials and those
involved with risk assessment of the potential transmission of animal prion
diseases to humans.
Technical Abstract:
Classical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (c-BSE) is an animal prion
disease that also causes variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. Over the
past decades, c-BSE's zoonotic potential has been the driving force in
establishing extensive protective measures for animal and human health.
***In complement to the recent demonstration that humanized mice are
susceptible to scrapie, we report here the first observation of direct
transmission of a natural classical scrapie isolate to a macaque after a 10-year
incubation period.
***Neuropathologic examination revealed all of the features of a prion
disease: spongiform change, neuronal loss, and accumulation of PrPres throughout
the CNS.
***This observation strengthens the questioning of the harmlessness of
scrapie to humans, at a time when protective measures for human and animal
health are being dismantled and reduced as c-BSE is considered controlled and
being eradicated.
***Our results underscore the importance of precautionary and protective
measures and the necessity for long-term experimental transmission studies to
assess the zoonotic potential of other animal prion strains.
***Our study demonstrates susceptibility of adult cattle to oral
transmission of classical BSE. ***
***our findings suggest that possible transmission risk of H-type BSE to
sheep and human. ***
P.86: Estimating the risk of transmission of BSE and scrapie to ruminants
and humans by protein misfolding cyclic amplification
Morikazu Imamura, Naoko Tabeta, Yoshifumi Iwamaru, and Yuichi Murayama
National Institute of Animal Health; Tsukuba, Japan
To assess the risk of the transmission of ruminant prions to ruminants and
humans at the molecular level, we investigated the ability of abnormal prion
protein (PrPSc) of typical and atypical BSEs (L-type and H-type) and typical
scrapie to convert normal prion protein (PrPC) from bovine, ovine, and human to
proteinase K-resistant PrPSc-like form (PrPres) using serial protein misfolding
cyclic amplification (PMCA).
Six rounds of serial PMCA was performed using 10% brain homogenates from
transgenic mice expressing bovine, ovine or human PrPC in combination with PrPSc
seed from typical and atypical BSE- or typical scrapie-infected brain
homogenates from native host species. In the conventional PMCA, the conversion
of PrPC to PrPres was observed only when the species of PrPC source and PrPSc
seed matched. However, in the PMCA with supplements (digitonin, synthetic polyA
and heparin), both bovine and ovine PrPC were converted by PrPSc from all tested
prion strains. On the other hand, human PrPC was converted by PrPSc from typical
and H-type BSE in this PMCA condition.
Although these results were not compatible with the previous reports
describing the lack of transmissibility of H-type BSE to ovine and human
transgenic mice,
***our findings suggest that possible transmission risk of H-type BSE to
sheep and human.
Bioassay will be required to determine whether the PMCA products are
infectious to these animals.
================
==========================================
PRION 2015 CONFERENCE FT. COLLINS CWD RISK FACTORS TO HUMANS
*** LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACTS PRION 2015 CONFERENCE ***
O18
Zoonotic Potential of CWD Prions
Liuting Qing1, Ignazio Cali1,2, Jue Yuan1, Shenghai Huang3, Diane Kofskey1,
Pierluigi Gambetti1, Wenquan Zou1, Qingzhong Kong1 1Case Western Reserve
University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy,
3Encore Health Resources, Houston, Texas, USA
*** These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect
human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic
human carriers of CWD infection.
==================
***These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect
human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic
human carriers of CWD infection.***
==================
P.105: RT-QuIC models trans-species prion transmission
Kristen Davenport, Davin Henderson, Candace Mathiason, and Edward Hoover
Prion Research Center; Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO USA
Conversely, FSE maintained sufficient BSE characteristics to more
efficiently convert bovine rPrP than feline rPrP. Additionally, human rPrP was
competent for conversion by CWD and fCWD.
***This insinuates that, at the level of protein:protein interactions, the
barrier preventing transmission of CWD to humans is less robust than previously
estimated.
================
***This insinuates that, at the level of protein:protein interactions, the
barrier preventing transmission of CWD to humans is less robust than previously
estimated.***
================
*** PRICE OF CWD TSE PRION POKER GOES UP 2014 ***
Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE PRION update January 2, 2014
*** chronic wasting disease, there was no absolute barrier to conversion of
the human prion protein.
*** Furthermore, the form of human PrPres produced in this in vitro assay
when seeded with CWD, resembles that found in the most common human prion
disease, namely sCJD of the MM1 subtype.
*** These results would seem to suggest that CWD does indeed have zoonotic
potential, at least as judged by the compatibility of CWD prions and their human
PrPC target. Furthermore, extrapolation from this simple in vitro assay suggests
that if zoonotic CWD occurred, it would most likely effect those of the PRNP
codon 129-MM genotype and that the PrPres type would be similar to that found in
the most common subtype of sCJD (MM1).***
*** The potential impact of prion diseases on human health was greatly
magnified by the recognition that interspecies transfer of BSE to humans by beef
ingestion resulted in vCJD. While changes in animal feed constituents and
slaughter practices appear to have curtailed vCJD, there is concern that CWD of
free-ranging deer and elk in the U.S. might also cross the species barrier.
Thus, consuming venison could be a source of human prion disease. Whether BSE
and CWD represent interspecies scrapie transfer or are newly arisen prion
diseases is unknown. Therefore, the possibility of transmission of prion disease
through other food animals cannot be ruled out. There is evidence that vCJD can
be transmitted through blood transfusion. There is likely a pool of unknown size
of asymptomatic individuals infected with vCJD, and there may be asymptomatic
individuals infected with the CWD equivalent. These circumstances represent a
potential threat to blood, blood products, and plasma supplies.
now, let’s see what the authors said about this casual link, personal
communications years ago. see where it is stated NO STRONG evidence. so, does
this mean there IS casual evidence ???? “Our conclusion stating that we found no
strong evidence of CWD transmission to humans”
From: TSS (216-119-163-189.ipset45.wt.net)
Subject: CWD aka MAD DEER/ELK TO HUMANS ???
Date: September 30, 2002 at 7:06 am PST
From: "Belay, Ermias"
To: Cc: "Race, Richard (NIH)" ; ; "Belay, Ermias"
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:22 AM
Subject: RE: TO CDC AND NIH - PUB MED- 3 MORE DEATHS - CWD - YOUNG HUNTERS
Dear Sir/Madam,
In the Archives of Neurology you quoted (the abstract of which was attached
to your email), we did not say CWD in humans will present like variant CJD. That
assumption would be wrong. I encourage you to read the whole article and call me
if you have questions or need more clarification (phone: 404-639-3091). Also, we
do not claim that "no-one has ever been infected with prion disease from eating
venison." Our conclusion stating that we found no strong evidence of CWD
transmission to humans in the article you quoted or in any other forum is
limited to the patients we investigated.
Ermias Belay, M.D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
-----Original Message-----
From: Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 10:15 AM
To: rr26k@nih.gov; rrace@niaid.nih.gov; ebb8@CDC.GOV
Subject: TO CDC AND NIH - PUB MED- 3 MORE DEATHS - CWD - YOUNG HUNTERS
Sunday, November 10, 2002 6:26 PM ......snip........end..............TSS
Thursday, April 03, 2008
A prion disease of cervids: Chronic wasting disease 2008 1: Vet Res. 2008
Apr 3;39(4):41 A prion disease of cervids: Chronic wasting disease Sigurdson CJ.
snip...
*** twenty-seven CJD patients who regularly consumed venison were reported
to the Surveillance Center***,
snip... full text ;
CJD is so rare in people under age 30, one case in a billion (leaving out
medical mishaps), that four cases under 30 is "very high," says Colorado
neurologist Bosque. "Then, if you add these other two from Wisconsin [cases in
the newspaper], six cases of CJD in people associated with venison is very, very
high." Only now, with Mary Riley, there are at least seven, and possibly eight,
with Steve, her dining companion. "It's not critical mass that matters,"
however, Belay says. "One case would do it for me." The chance that two people
who know each other would both contact CJD, like the two Wisconsin sportsmen, is
so unlikely, experts say, it would happen only once in 140 years.
Given the incubation period for TSEs in humans, it may require another
generation to write the final chapter on CWD in Wisconsin. "Does chronic wasting
disease pass into humans? We'll be able to answer that in 2022," says Race.
Meanwhile, the state has become part of an immense experiment.
I urge everyone to watch this video closely...terry
*** you can see video here and interview with Jeff's Mom, and scientist
telling you to test everything and potential risk factors for humans ***
Envt.07:
Pathological Prion Protein (PrPTSE) in Skeletal Muscles of Farmed and Free
Ranging White-Tailed Deer Infected with Chronic Wasting Disease
***The presence and seeding activity of PrPTSE in skeletal muscle from
CWD-infected cervids suggests prevention of such tissue in the human diet as a
precautionary measure for food safety, pending on further clarification of
whether CWD may be transmissible to humans.
Prions in Skeletal Muscles of Deer with Chronic Wasting Disease Rachel C.
Angers1,*, Shawn R. Browning1,*,†, Tanya S. Seward2, Christina J. Sigurdson4,‡,
Michael W. Miller5, Edward A. Hoover4, Glenn C. Telling1,2,3,§ snip...
Abstract The emergence of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in deer and elk in
an increasingly wide geographic area, as well as the interspecies transmission
of bovine spongiform encephalopathy to humans in the form of variant Creutzfeldt
Jakob disease, have raised concerns about the zoonotic potential of CWD. Because
meat consumption is the most likely means of exposure, it is important to
determine whether skeletal muscle of diseased cervids contains prion
infectivity. Here bioassays in transgenic mice expressing cervid prion protein
revealed the presence of infectious prions in skeletal muscles of CWD-infected
deer, demonstrating that humans consuming or handling meat from CWD-infected
deer are at risk to prion exposure.
***********CJD REPORT 1994 increased risk for consumption of veal and
venison and lamb***********
CREUTZFELDT JAKOB DISEASE SURVEILLANCE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM THIRD ANNUAL
REPORT AUGUST 1994
Consumption of venison and veal was much less widespread among both cases
and controls. For both of these meats there was evidence of a trend with
increasing frequency of consumption being associated with increasing risk of
CJD. (not nvCJD, but sporadic CJD...tss)
These associations were largely unchanged when attention was restricted to
pairs with data obtained from relatives. ...
Table 9 presents the results of an analysis of these data.
There is STRONG evidence of an association between ‘’regular’’ veal eating
and risk of CJD (p = .0.01).
Individuals reported to eat veal on average at least once a year appear to
be at 13 TIMES THE RISK of individuals who have never eaten veal.
There is, however, a very wide confidence interval around this estimate.
There is no strong evidence that eating veal less than once per year is
associated with increased risk of CJD (p = 0.51).
The association between venison eating and risk of CJD shows similar
pattern, with regular venison eating associated with a 9 FOLD INCREASE IN RISK
OF CJD (p = 0.04).
There is some evidence that risk of CJD INCREASES WITH INCREASING FREQUENCY
OF LAMB EATING (p = 0.02).
The evidence for such an association between beef eating and CJD is weaker
(p = 0.14). When only controls for whom a relative was interviewed are included,
this evidence becomes a little STRONGER (p = 0.08).
snip...
It was found that when veal was included in the model with another
exposure, the association between veal and CJD remained statistically
significant (p = < 0.05 for all exposures), while the other exposures
ceased to be statistically significant (p = > 0.05).
snip...
In conclusion, an analysis of dietary histories revealed statistical
associations between various meats/animal products and INCREASED RISK OF CJD.
When some account was taken of possible confounding, the association between
VEAL EATING AND RISK OF CJD EMERGED AS THE STRONGEST OF THESE ASSOCIATIONS
STATISTICALLY. ...
snip...
In the study in the USA, a range of foodstuffs were associated with an
increased risk of CJD, including liver consumption which was associated with an
apparent SIX-FOLD INCREASE IN THE RISK OF CJD. By comparing the data from 3
studies in relation to this particular dietary factor, the risk of liver
consumption became non-significant with an odds ratio of 1.2 (PERSONAL
COMMUNICATION, PROFESSOR A. HOFMAN. ERASMUS UNIVERSITY, ROTTERDAM). (???...TSS)
snip...see full report ;
CJD9/10022
October 1994
Mr R.N. Elmhirst Chairman British Deer Farmers Association Holly Lodge
Spencers Lane BerksWell Coventry CV7 7BZ
Dear Mr Elmhirst,
CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE (CJD) SURVEILLANCE UNIT REPORT
Thank you for your recent letter concerning the publication of the third
annual report from the CJD Surveillance Unit. I am sorry that you are
dissatisfied with the way in which this report was published.
The Surveillance Unit is a completely independant outside body and the
Department of Health is committed to publishing their reports as soon as they
become available. In the circumstances it is not the practice to circulate the
report for comment since the findings of the report would not be amended. In
future we can ensure that the British Deer Farmers Association receives a copy
of the report in advance of publication.
The Chief Medical Officer has undertaken to keep the public fully informed
of the results of any research in respect of CJD. This report was entirely the
work of the unit and was produced completely independantly of the the
Department.
The statistical results reqarding the consumption of venison was put into
perspective in the body of the report and was not mentioned at all in the press
release. Media attention regarding this report was low key but gave a realistic
presentation of the statistical findings of the Unit. This approach to
publication was successful in that consumption of venison was highlighted only
once by the media ie. in the News at one television proqramme.
I believe that a further statement about the report, or indeed statistical
links between CJD and consumption of venison, would increase, and quite possibly
give damaging credence, to the whole issue. From the low key media reports of
which I am aware it seems unlikely that venison consumption will suffer
adversely, if at all.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030511010117/http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/yb/1994/10/00003001.pdf
*** These results would seem to suggest that CWD does indeed have zoonotic
potential, at least as judged by the compatibility of CWD prions and their human
PrPC target. Furthermore, extrapolation from this simple in vitro assay suggests
that if zoonotic CWD occurred, it would most likely effect those of the PRNP
codon 129-MM genotype and that the PrPres type would be similar to that found in
the most common subtype of sCJD (MM1).***
O.05: Transmission of prions to primates after extended silent incubation
periods: Implications for BSE and scrapie risk assessment in human populations
Emmanuel Comoy, Jacqueline Mikol, Valerie Durand, Sophie Luccantoni,
Evelyne Correia, Nathalie Lescoutra, Capucine Dehen, and Jean-Philippe Deslys
Atomic Energy Commission; Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
Prion diseases (PD) are the unique neurodegenerative proteinopathies
reputed to be transmissible under field conditions since decades. The
transmission of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) to humans evidenced that
an animal PD might be zoonotic under appropriate conditions. Contrarily, in the
absence of obvious (epidemiological or experimental) elements supporting a
transmission or genetic predispositions, PD, like the other proteinopathies, are
reputed to occur spontaneously (atpical animal prion strains, sporadic CJD
summing 80% of human prion cases). Non-human primate models provided the first
evidences supporting the transmissibiity of human prion strains and the zoonotic
potential of BSE. Among them, cynomolgus macaques brought major information for
BSE risk assessment for human health (Chen, 2014), according to their
phylogenetic proximity to humans and extended lifetime. We used this model to
assess the zoonotic potential of other animal PD from bovine, ovine and cervid
origins even after very long silent incubation periods.
*** We recently observed the direct transmission of a natural classical
scrapie isolate to macaque after a 10-year silent incubation period,
***with features similar to some reported for human cases of sporadic CJD,
albeit requiring fourfold long incubation than BSE. Scrapie, as recently evoked
in humanized mice (Cassard, 2014),
***is the third potentially zoonotic PD (with BSE and L-type BSE),
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases. We will present an
updated panorama of our different transmission studies and discuss the
implications of such extended incubation periods on risk assessment of animal PD
for human health.
===============
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases***
===============
***our findings suggest that possible transmission risk of H-type BSE to
sheep and human. Bioassay will be required to determine whether the PMCA
products are infectious to these animals.
==============
Research Project: TRANSMISSION, DIFFERENTIATION, AND PATHOBIOLOGY OF
TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHIES
Title: Transmission of scrapie prions to primate after an extended silent
incubation period
Authors
item Comoy, Emmanuel - item Mikol, Jacqueline - item Luccantoni-Freire,
Sophie - item Correia, Evelyne - item Lescoutra-Etchegaray, Nathalie - item
Durand, Valérie - item Dehen, Capucine - item Andreoletti, Olivier - item
Casalone, Cristina - item Richt, Juergen item Greenlee, Justin item Baron,
Thierry - item Benestad, Sylvie - item Hills, Bob - item Brown, Paul - item
Deslys, Jean-Philippe -
Submitted to: Scientific Reports Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: May 28, 2015 Publication Date: June 30, 2015
Citation: Comoy, E.E., Mikol, J., Luccantoni-Freire, S., Correia, E.,
Lescoutra-Etchegaray, N., Durand, V., Dehen, C., Andreoletti, O., Casalone, C.,
Richt, J.A., Greenlee, J.J., Baron, T., Benestad, S., Brown, P., Deslys, J.
2015. Transmission of scrapie prions to primate after an extended silent
incubation period. Scientific Reports. 5:11573.
Interpretive Summary: The transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (also
called prion diseases) are fatal neurodegenerative diseases that affect animals
and humans. The agent of prion diseases is a misfolded form of the prion protein
that is resistant to breakdown by the host cells. Since all mammals express
prion protein on the surface of various cells such as neurons, all mammals are,
in theory, capable of replicating prion diseases. One example of a prion
disease, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE; also called mad cow disease),
has been shown to infect cattle, sheep, exotic undulates, cats, non-human
primates, and humans when the new host is exposed to feeds or foods contaminated
with the disease agent. The purpose of this study was to test whether non-human
primates (cynomologous macaque) are susceptible to the agent of sheep scrapie.
After an incubation period of approximately 10 years a macaque developed
progressive clinical signs suggestive of neurologic disease. Upon postmortem
examination and microscopic examination of tissues, there was a widespread
distribution of lesions consistent with a transmissible spongiform
encephalopathy. This information will have a scientific impact since it is the
first study that demonstrates the transmission of scrapie to a non-human primate
with a close genetic relationship to humans. This information is especially
useful to regulatory officials and those involved with risk assessment of the
potential transmission of animal prion diseases to humans. Technical Abstract:
Classical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (c-BSE) is an animal prion disease
that also causes variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. Over the past
decades, c-BSE's zoonotic potential has been the driving force in establishing
extensive protective measures for animal and human health.
*** In complement to the recent demonstration that humanized mice are
susceptible to scrapie, we report here the first observation of direct
transmission of a natural classical scrapie isolate to a macaque after a 10-year
incubation period. Neuropathologic examination revealed all of the features of a
prion disease: spongiform change, neuronal loss, and accumulation of PrPres
throughout the CNS.
*** This observation strengthens the questioning of the harmlessness of
scrapie to humans, at a time when protective measures for human and animal
health are being dismantled and reduced as c-BSE is considered controlled and
being eradicated.
*** Our results underscore the importance of precautionary and protective
measures and the necessity for long-term experimental transmission studies to
assess the zoonotic potential of other animal prion strains.
***This information will have a scientific impact since it is the first
study that demonstrates the transmission of scrapie to a non-human primate with
a close genetic relationship to humans. This information is especially useful to
regulatory officials and those involved with risk assessment of the potential
transmission of animal prion diseases to humans.
***This observation strengthens the questioning of the harmlessness of
scrapie to humans, at a time when protective measures for human and animal
health are being dismantled and reduced as c-BSE is considered controlled and
being eradicated. Our results underscore the importance of precautionary and
protective measures and the necessity for long-term experimental transmission
studies to assess the zoonotic potential of other animal prion strains.
why do we not want to do TSE transmission studies on chimpanzees $
5. A positive result from a chimpanzee challenged severly would likely
create alarm in some circles even if the result could not be interpreted for
man. I have a view that all these agents could be transmitted provided a large
enough dose by appropriate routes was given and the animals kept long enough.
Until the mechanisms of the species barrier are more clearly understood it might
be best to retain that hypothesis.
snip...
R. BRADLEY
”The occurrence of CWD must be viewed against the contest of the locations
in which it occurred. It was an incidental and unwelcome complication of the
respective wildlife research programmes. Despite it’s subsequent recognition as
a new disease of cervids, therefore justifying direct investigation, no specific
research funding was forthcoming. The USDA veiwed it as a wildlife problem and
consequently not their province!” page 26.
In Confidence - Perceptions of unconventional slow virus diseases of
animals in the USA - APRIL-MAY 1989 - G A H Wells
3. Prof. A. Robertson gave a brief account of BSE. The US approach was to
accord it a very low profile indeed. Dr. A Thiermann showed the picture in the
''Independent'' with cattle being incinerated and thought this was a fanatical
incident to be avoided in the US at all costs. ...
MAD COW DISEASE HAS BEEN IN THE USA FOR DECADES, AND I BELIEVE IT WAS IN
THE USA FIRST, PLEASE SEE ;
Evidence That Transmissible Mink Encephalopathy Results from Feeding
Infected Cattle Over the next 8-10 weeks, approximately 40% of all the adult
mink on the farm died from TME.
snip...
The rancher was a ''dead stock'' feeder using mostly (>95%) downer
or dead dairy cattle...
Sunday, January 17, 2016
Texas 10,000 deer in Texas tested for deadly disease CWD TSE, but not
tested much in the most logical place, the five-mile radius around the Medina
County captive-deer facility where it was discovered
Friday, January 15, 2016
TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE CWD Ante-Mortem Testing Symposium Texas Disposal
Systems Events Pavilion January 12, 2016
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
TEXAS MONTHLY CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD JANUARY 2016 DEER BREEDERS STILL
DON'T GET IT $
Chronic Wasting Unease
The emergence of a deadly disease has wildlife officials and deer breeders
eyeing each other suspiciously.
Monday, November 16, 2015
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ORDER NO. 015-006
Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) immediate danger to the white-tailed deer and mule
deer resources of Texas
Saturday, November 14, 2015
TEXAS CAPTIVE BREEDER CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD 2 MORE SUSPECTS DECTECTED
BRINGING NUMBER TO 7 DETECTED IN CAPTIVE BREEDER (if/when the last two are
confirmed).
Thursday, November 05, 2015
*** TPW Commission Adopts Interim Deer Breeder Movement Rules
Thursday, September 24, 2015
TEXAS Hunters Asked to Submit Samples for Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE
Prion Testing
*** I cannot stress enough to all of you, for the sake of your family and
mine, before putting anything in the freezer, have those deer tested for CWD.
...terry
Sunday, September 13, 2015
TEXAS DETECTS MORE DEER POSITIVE FOR CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD tested at
a Tier 1 facility (a facility that either sold to or purchased directly from the
index facility)
Friday, October 09, 2015
Texas TWA Chronic Wasting Disease TSE Prion Webinars and Meeting October
2015
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
TAHC 393rd Commission Meeting Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion October
6, 2015
Saturday, October 03, 2015
TEXAS CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION GOD MUST NOT BE A TEXAN 2002 TO
2015
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
*** Chronic Wasting Disease CWD Cases Confirmed In New Mexico 2013 and 2014
UPDATE 2015
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
Chronic Wasting Disease CWD Confirmed Texas Trans Pecos March 18,
2015
TEXAS DEER CZAR SENT TO WISCONSIN TO SOLVE CWD CRISIS, WHILE ROME (TEXAS)
BURNS
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Wisconsin doing what it does best, procrastinating about CWD yet again
thanks to Governor Walker
TEXAS DEER CZAR SENT TO WISCONSIN TO SOLVE CWD CRISIS, WHILE ROME (TEXAS)
BURNS
Wednesday, March 04, 2015
*** Disease sampling results provide current snapshot of CWD in Wisconsin
finding 324 positive detections statewide in 2014
Friday, June 01, 2012
*** TEXAS DEER CZAR TO WISCONSIN ASK TO EXPLAIN COMMENTS
RAW, UNCUT, AND UNCENSORED
Sunday, August 23, 2015
TAHC Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion and how to put lipstick on a pig
and take her to the dance in Texas
Friday, August 07, 2015
*** Texas CWD Captive, and then there were 4 ?
Thursday, August 06, 2015
*** WE HAVE LOST TEXAS TO CWD TASK FORCE CATERING TO INDUSTRY
http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2015/08/we-have-lost-texas-to-cwd-task-force.html
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
*** Texas CWD Medina County Herd Investigation Update July 16, 2015 ***
Thursday, July 09, 2015
TEXAS Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Herd Plan for Trace-Forward Exposed
Herd with Testing of Exposed Animals
Wednesday, July 01, 2015
*** TEXAS Chronic Wasting Disease Detected in Medina County Captive Deer
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Texas 84th Legislature 2015 H.R. No. 2597 Kuempel Deer Breeding Industry
TAHC TPWD CWD TSE PRION
Thursday, May 02, 2013
*** Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Texas Important Update on OBEX ONLY
TEXTING
Monday, February 11, 2013
TEXAS CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD Four New Positives Found in Trans Pecos
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Chronic Wasting Disease Detected in Far West Texas
Monday, March 26, 2012
Texas Prepares for Chronic Wasting Disease CWD Possibility in Far West
Texas
***for anyone interested, here is some history of CWD along the Texas, New
Mexico border, and my attempt to keep up with it...terry
***CWD TEXAS TAHC OLD FILE HISTORY
updated from some of my old files. ...
Subject: CWD SURVEILLANCE STATISTICS TEXAS (total testing figures less than
50 in two years)
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:06:49 –0700
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
To: BSE-L@uni-karlsruhe.de
######## Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy #########
greetings list members,
here are some figures on CWD testing in TEXAS...TSS
Dear Dr. Singletary,
In Fiscal Year 2001, seven deer from Texas were tested by the National
Veterinary Services Laboratory (NVSL) for CWD (5 fallow deer and 2 white-tailed
deer). In Fiscal Year 2002, seven elk from Texas were tested at NVSL (no deer).
During these two years, an additional six elk and one white-tailed deer were
tested at the Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory (TVMDL). In Fiscal
Year 2002, four white-tailed deer (free-ranging clinical suspects) and at least
eight other white-tailed deer have been tested at TVMDL. One elk has been tested
at NVSL. All of these animals have been found negative for CWD. Dr. Jerry Cooke
of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department also has records of 601 clinically
ill white-tailed deer which were necropsied at Texas A&M during the late
1960's and early 1970's, and no spongiform encepalopathies were noted. Thank you
for your consideration.
xxxxxxx
Texas Animal Health Commission
(personal communication...TSS)
Austin 8 news
snip...
"There's about 4 million deer in the state of Texas, and as a resource I
think we need to be doing as much as we can to look for these diseases," said
Doug Humphreys with Texas Parks and Wildlife. "Right now Texas is clear. We
haven't found any, but that doesn't mean we don't look."
With approximately 4 million animals, Texas has the largest population of
white-tailed deer in the nation. In addition, about 19,000 white-tailed deer and
17,000 elk are being held in private facilities. To know if CWD is present in
captive herds, TPWD and Texas Animal Health Commission are working with breeders
to monitor their herds.
How is it spread?
It is not known exactly how CWD is spread. It is believed that the agent
responsible for the disease may be spread both directly (animal to animal
contact) and indirectly (soil or other surface to animal). It is thought that
the most common mode of transmission from an infected animal is via saliva,
feces, and urine.
some surveillance?
beyond the _potential_ methods of transmissions above, why, not a single
word of SRM of various TSE species in feed as a source?
it's a known fact they have been feeding the deer/elk the same stuff as
cows here in USA.
and the oral route has been documented of CWD to mule deer fawns in lab
studies.
not to say that other _potential_ transmission mechanisms are possible, but
why over look the obvious?
TSS
########### http://mailhost.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/warc/bse-l.html
############
From: Ken Waldrup, DVM, PhD (host25-207.tahc.state.tx.us)
Subject: Re: CWD SAMPLING TEXAS (but NOT in the obvious place, the NM,
TEXAS border)
Date: December 15, 2003 at 3:43 pm PST
In Reply to: CWD SAMPLING TEXAS (but NOT in the obvious place, the NM,
TEXAS border) posted by TSS on December 12, 2003 at 2:15 pm:
Dear sirs:
With regard to your comment about Texas NOT looking for CWD along the New
Mexico border, it is painfully obvious that you do not know or understand the
natural distribution of mule deer out there or the rights of the land owners in
this state. As of 15 December 2003, a total of 42 deer had been sampled from
what we call "Trans-Pecos", beyond the Pecos River. Mule deer are very widely
dispersed through this area, sometimes at densities of one animal per 6 square
miles. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department does not have the legal authority
to trepass on private property to collect deer. Some landowners are cooperative.
Some are not. Franklin State Park is at the very tip of Texas, and deer from the
park have been tested (all negative). One of the single largest land owners
along the border is the National Park Service. Deer and elk from the Guadalupe
Peak National Park cannot be collected with federal permission. The sampling
throughout the state is based on the deer populations by eco-region and is
dictated by the availability of funds. I am concerned about your insinuation
that CWD is a human health risk. We are at a stand-off - you have no proof that
it is and I have no definitive proof that it isn't. However I would say that the
inferred evidence from Colorado, Wyoming and Wisconsin suggests that CWD is not
a human health concern (i.e. no evidence of an increased incidence of human
brain disorders within the CWD "endemic" areas of these states). From my
professional interactions with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, I can
definitely say that they want to do a thorough and sound survey throughout the
state, not willy-nilly "look here, look there". There are limitations of
manpower, finances and, in some places, deer populations. I would congratulate
TPWD for doing the best job with the limitations at hand rather than trying to
browbeat them when you obviously do not understand the ecology of West Texas.
Thank you for your consideration.
======================
From: TSS (216-119-139-126.ipset19.wt.net)
Subject: Re: CWD SAMPLING TEXAS (but NOT in the obvious place, the NM,
TEXAS border)
Date: December 16, 2003 at 11:03 am PST
In Reply to: Re: CWD SAMPLING TEXAS (but NOT in the obvious place, the NM,
TEXAS border) posted by Ken Waldrup, DVM, PhD on December 15, 2003 at 3:43 pm:
HEllo Dr. Waldrup,
thank you for your comments and time to come to this board.
Ken Waldrup, DVM, PhD states;
> it is painfully obvious that you do not know or understand the natural
distribution of mule deer out there or the rights of the land owners in this
state...
TSS states;
I am concerned about all deer/elk not just mule deer, and the rights of
land owners (in the case with human/animal TSEs) well i am not sure of the
correct terminology, but when the States deer/elk/cattle/sheep/humans are at
risk, there should be no rights for land owners in this case. the state should
have the right to test those animals. there are too many folks out there that
are just plain ignorant about this agent. with an agent such as this, you cannot
let landowners (and i am one) dictate human/animal health, especially when you
cannot regulate the movement of such animals...
Ken Waldrup, DVM, PhD states;
> Deer and elk from the Guadalupe Peak National Park cannot be collected
with federal permission.
TSS states;
I do not understand this? so there is no recourse of action even if every
deer/elk was contaminated with CWD in this area (hypothetical)?
Ken Waldrup, DVM, PhD states;
> I am concerned about your insinuation that CWD is a human health risk.
We are at a stand-off - you have no proof that it is and I have no definitive
proof that it isn't. However I would say that the inferred evidence from
Colorado, Wyoming and Wisconsin suggests that CWD is not a human health concern
(i.e. no evidence of an increased incidence of human brain disorders within the
CWD "endemic" areas of these states)...
TSS states;
NEXT, let's have a look at the overall distribution of CWD in Free-Ranging
Cervids and see where the CWD cluster in NM WSMR borders TEXAS;
Current Distribution of Chronic Wasting Disease in Free-Ranging Cervids
NOW, the MAP of the Exoregion where the samples were taken to test for CWD;
CWD SURVEILLANCE SAMPLE SUBMISSIONS TEXAS
Ecoregions of TEXAS
IF you look at the area around the NM WSMR where the CWD cluster was and
where it borders TEXAS, that ecoregion is called Trans Pecos region. Seems if my
Geography and my Ciphering is correct ;-) that region only tested 55% of it's
goal. THE most important area on the MAP and they only test some 96 samples,
this in an area that has found some 7 positive animals? NOW if we look at the
only other border where these deer from NM could cross the border into TEXAS,
this area is called the High Plains ecoregion, and again, we find that the
sampling for CWD was pathetic. HERE we find that only 9% of it's goal of CWD
sampling was met, only 16 samples were tested from some 175 that were suppose to
be sampled.
AS i said before;
> SADLY, they have not tested enough from the total population to
> know if CWD is in Texas or not.
BUT now, I will go one step further and state categorically that they are
not trying to find it. just the opposite it seems, they are waiting for CWD to
find them, as with BSE/TSE in cattle, and it will eventually...
snip...end...TSS
===============================
2005
SEE MAP OF CWD ON THE BORDER OF NEW MEXICO VERY CLOSE TO TEXAS ;
NO update on CWD testing in Texas, New Mexico that i could find. I have
inquired about it though, no reply yet...
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: CWD testing to date TEXAS ?
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 12:26:20 –0500
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
To: kristen.everett@tpwd.state.tx.us
Hello Mrs. Everett,
I am most curious about the current status on CWD testing in Texas. could
you please tell me what the current and past testing figures are to date and
what geographical locations these tests have been in. good bust on the illegal
deer trapping case. keep up the good work there.........
thank you, with kindest regards,
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box 42 Bacliff, Texas USA 77518
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: CWD testing in New Mexico
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 14:39:18 –0500
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
To: ispa@state.nm.us
Greetings,
I am most curious of the current and past CWD testing in New Mexico, and
there geographical locations...
thank you,
Terry S. Singeltary SR. CJD Watch
#################### https://lists.aegee.org/bse-l.html
####################
2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." flounder9@VERIZON.NET
To: BSE-L@aegee.org
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: CWD in New Mexico 35 MILES FROM TEXAS BORDER and low testing
sampling figures -- what gives TAHC ???
Subject: CWD in New Mexico 35 MILES FROM TEXAS BORDER and low testing
sampling figures -- what gives TAHC ???
Date: December 23, 2006 at 11:25 am PST
Greetings BSE-L members,
i never know if i am going crazy or just more of the same BSe. several
years ago i brought up the fact to the TAHC that CWD was literally at the Texas
borders and that the sample size for cwd testing was no where near enough in the
location of that zone bordering NM. well, i just wrote them another letter
questioning this again on Dec. 14, 2006 (see below) and showed them two
different pdf maps, one referencing this url, which both worked just fine then.
since then, i have NOT received a letter from them answering my question, and
the url for the map i used as reference is no longer working? i had reference
this map several times from the hunter-kill cwd sampling as of 31 August 2005
pdf which NO longer works now??? but here are those figures for that zone
bordering NM, for those that were questioning the url. the testing samples
elsewhere across Texas where much much more than that figure in the zone
bordering NM where CWD has been documented bordering TEXAS, near the White Sands
Missile Range. SO, why was the Texas hunter-kill cwd sampling as of 31 August
2005 document removed from the internet??? you know, this reminds me of the
infamous TEXAS MAD COW that i documented some 7 or 8 months before USDA et al
documented it, when the TAHC accidentally started ramping up for the
announcement on there web site, then removed it (see history at bottom). i am
not screaming conspiracy here, but confusious is confused again on the ciphering
there using for geographical distribution of cwd tissue sample size survey, IF
they are serious about finding CWD in TEXAS. common sense would tell you if cwd
is 35 miles from the border, you would not run across state and have your larger
samples there, and least samples 35 miles from where is what
found..........daaa..........TSS
THEN NOTICE CWD sample along that border in TEXAS, Three Year Summary of
Hunter-Kill CWD sampling as of 31 August 2005 of only 191 samples, then compare
to the other sample locations ;
TPWD has been conducting surveys of hunter-kill animals since 2002 and has
collected more than 7300 samples (as of 31 August 2005). In total, there have
been over 9400 samples, both hunter-kill and private samples, tested in Texas to
date, and no positives have been found.
SO, out of a total of 9,400 samples taken for CWD surveillance in TEXAS
since 2002 of both hunter-kill and private kill, ONLY 191 samples have been
taken in the most likely place one would find CWD i.e. the border where CWD has
been documented at TEXAS and New Mexico
latest map NM cwd old data
CWD in New Mexico ;
What is the Department doing to prevent the spread of CWD?
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) was recently detected in a mule deer from
Unit 34. Until 2005, CWD had only been found in Unit 19. With this discovery,
the Department will increase its surveillance of deer and elk harvested in Units
29, 30 and 34.
Lymph nodes and/or brain stems from every harvested deer and brain stems
from all elk taken in Unit 34 will be sampled.
snip...
CWD SURVEILLANCE TEXAS
SNIP...SEE FULL TEXT ;
2011 – 2012
Friday, October 28, 2011
CWD Herd Monitoring Program to be Enforced Jan. 2012 TEXAS
Greetings TAHC et al,
A kind greetings from Bacliff, Texas.
In reply to ;
Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) Announcement October 27, 2011
I kindly submit the following ;
***for anyone interested, here is some history of CWD along the Texas, New
Mexico border, and my attempt to keep up with it...terry
snip...
see history CWD Texas, New Mexico Border ;
Monday, March 26, 2012
3 CASES OF CWD FOUND NEW MEXICO MULE DEER SEVERAL MILES FROM TEXAS BORDER
Sunday, October 04, 2009
CWD NEW MEXICO SPREADING SOUTH TO TEXAS 2009 2009 Summary of Chronic
Wasting Disease in New Mexico New Mexico Department of Game and Fish
*****2015-2016***
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
*** Wisconsin Two deer that escaped farm had chronic wasting disease CWD
***
Sunday, January 17, 2016
*** Wisconsin Captive CWD Lotto Pays Out Again indemnity payment of
$298,770 for 228 white-tailed deer killed on farm ***
Friday, February 05, 2016
*** Report of the Committee on Wildlife Diseases FY2015 CWD TSE PRION
Detections in Farmed Cervids and Wild ***
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Texas Deer-breeder drops suit against state over Chronic Wasting Disease
CWD disease tactics
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
TVMDL hosts legislative representatives, discusses CWD
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Bacliff, Texas USA flounder9@verizon.net
posted by Terry S. Singeltary Sr. at
3:18 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home