Friday, July 17, 2015
News Release Media Contact: Steve Lightfoot, 512-389-4701, 
steve.lightfoot@tpwd.texas.gov
July 16, 2015 
 TPW Commission Holds Special Meeting on Chronic Wasting Disease AUSTIN – 
The Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission today heard testimony from staff and 
invited guests on a variety of issues relating to Chronic Wasting Disease during 
a special meeting at Texas Parks and Wildlife Headquarters.
Presenters provided background, information, concerns and options to the 
commission in response to the recent discovery of CWD in a two-year-old 
white-tailed deer in a Medina County deer breeding facility. Included in the 
testimony were possible measures to further minimize the risk of CWD spreading 
into Texas’ free-ranging white-tailed deer herd, and to protect the captive deer 
breeding industry.
Invited testimony was provided by Dr. Walt Cook, former Wyoming State 
Veterinarian and current Wildlife Population Health Veterinarian at Texas 
A&M University; Dr. Andy Schwartz, Assistant Executive Director with the 
Texas Animal Health Commission; Clayton Wolf, Wildlife Division Director for the 
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department; Chase Clark, President of the Texas Deer 
Association; David Yeates, Chief Executive Officer of the Texas Wildlife 
Association; Chris Timmons, Deer Breeders Corp. president; and Dr. Roel Lopez, 
president of the Texas Chapter-The Wildlife Society.
Following the presentations, TPW Commission Chairman Dan A. Hughes Jr., 
offered the following statement:
“First and foremost, I want to thank everyone for being with us here today 
and for your interest in this important issue. Audio from today’s meeting will 
be available online over the next couple of days. I have also asked staff to 
make the powerpoints presented today available on the TPWD website for everyone 
who wasn’t in the room today to review.
It is important for all of us to remember that Chronic Wasting Disease 
doesn’t pick sides. It doesn’t make alliances. It affects all of us in this 
room. We (staff, commission, hunters, breeders, etc.) are all connected to this. 
I believe that we owe it to the people of Texas and the more than 4 million 
free-ranging and captive deer, to do everything we can to contain this threat 
and ensure it doesn’t spread. It is important that we hear and consider all 
perspectives.
I want to thank TPWD staff and the Texas Animal Health Commission for the 
countless hours and tireless efforts spent to assemble, review and consider an 
overwhelming amount of information as they work to make the best recommendations 
for moving forward. We want to get business back to normal as soon as possible, 
as well. But, it is important that we do so in a manner that smart and safe for 
everyone involved. Texas is going to be the gold-standard for how to 
appropriately respond to Chronic Wasting Disease. We want to use every 
opportunity to learn from this event as we proceed.
In moving forward, it is crucial that we not lose sight of the three 
primary goals of any response:
Minimize CWD risks to the wild and captive white-tailed deer, mule deer, 
and other susceptible species in Texas. Establish and maintain support for 
prudent CWD management with hunters, landowners, and other stakeholders. 
Minimize direct and indirect impacts of CWD to hunting, hunting related 
economies, and conservation in Texas. No decision will be perfect. Each possible 
decision involves some level of risk, and based on the information heard today, 
I would like to encourage staff to: Support the CWD Working Group’s 
recommendation to initially test those animals deemed highest-risk at the index 
facility as expeditiously as possible. Assess the risk on all other breeder 
facilities and place a premium on allowing TAHC Certified Herds and 
wholly-disconnected facilities to resume movement of deer soon. Use the best 
available science, and don’t be afraid to innovate wherever possible Ultimately, 
I would like for us to not only be particularly sensitive to minimizing impacts 
to breeder facilities but also minimizing the risk to the state’s free-ranging 
deer herd which is critically important to Texas’ deer economy and other 
landowners and hunters across the state.”
Audio from today’s Special Commission meeting can be found on the TPWD 
website: http://tpwd.texas.gov/business/feedback/meetings/2015/0716/agenda/
SL 2015-07-16 
 Parks and Wildlife meeting addresses chronic wasting disease in Medina 
County 
First case in state detected earlier this month 
By Pilar Arias 
Reporter 
SAN ANTONIO - The Medina County deer breeder whose white-tailed deer was 
found to be the first case of chronic wasting disease in the state wants to work 
with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and Texas Animal Health Commission 
to tackle the problem. 
RELATED CONTENT 
Chronic wasting disease detected in Medina County 
Texas Mountain Ranch owner Robert Patterson said he found the dead deer in 
a pen with numerous others with its head stuck under a trough. He immediately 
sent it to a veterinarian for testing and it came back positive for CWD.
Patterson, and hundreds of other breeders, attended a special Texas Parks 
and Wildlife Commission meeting to hear possibilities to minimize further risk 
to wild and other captive deer.
At the end of the meeting, the commission recommended staff further test 
the affected herd, figure out a way to move deer from unaffected herds across 
the state and protect native whitetail.
"We drew the black bean and that's a tough deal, but in a way I'm glad, 
because I think we can take care of it," Patterson said. "I don't think it will 
hurt the hunting in Texas one cent. People are still going to come here, because 
the deer are available."
Patterson said state agencies want to slaughter 139 adult deer and 99 fawns 
from his ranch July 20 to test for CWD. When KSAT asked Parks and Wildlife 
Department spokesman Steve Lightfoot if that was true, he said he didn't know if 
that was the correct number.
Not only does Patterson not believe slaughter is the answer to the problem, 
he said he's sent nearly 900 deer to 147 facilities across the state. He wants 
to know when the slaughter will stop, if it starts.
"At some point in time, common sense has to prevail and you have to use 
science to fight it," Patterson said.
Breeders are now worried about their ability to move deer across the 
state.
"It's not about deer and deer hunting. It's about people and their 
livelihoods in rural communities," Karl Kinsel of the Texas Deer Association 
said.
Commission Chairman Dan Allen Hughes Jr. told KSAT the affected herd will 
be tested using both live and postmortem techniques. Hughes said he doesn't 
believe there will be any restrictions placed on deer hunting this season 
because of CWD. 
 Copyright 2015 by KSAT - All rights reserved. 
TO DATE, there have been 8 _documented_ cases of CWD in Texas. the state of 
Texas has floundered to long with CWD TSE prion. if Texas does not act now, and 
caters to the industry, you will look at another Wisconsin in relations to 
Chronic Wasting Disease CWD. CWD has been waltzing across Texas from New Mexico 
for over a decade, long enough to spread this CWD all across the state. Texas 
thought it was immune to mad cow disease, Texas fell to mad cow disease after a 
long attempt to cover it up. that is a fact, and everyone around the world knows 
it. how will Texas handle CWD, probably the same way, Texas will cater to the 
industry, and thus, cwd tse prion will be trucked to hell and back. I urge every 
state out there to stay very keen to how TAHC TPWD handle this cwd, or you may 
be the next state with CWD TSE prion. because the only thing the state of Texas 
has come to care about, is the state of Texas and their corporate interest$$$ 
...terry
CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD WISCONSIN Almond Deer (Buckhorn Flats) Farm 
Update DECEMBER 2011 The CWD infection rate was nearly 80%, the highest ever in 
a North American captive herd. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the 
purchase of 80 acres of land for $465,000 for the Statewide Wildlife Habitat 
Program in Portage County and approve the restrictions on public use of the 
site.SUMMARY:
Wisconsin : 436 Deer Have Escaped From Farms to Wild
Date: March 18, 2003 Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Contacts: LEE BERGQUIST lbergquist@journalsentinel.com 
State finds violations, lax record keeping at many sites, report says A 
state inspection of private deer farms, prompted by the discovery of chronic 
wasting disease, found that 436 white-tailed deer escaped into the wild, 
officials said Tuesday
The Department of Natural Resources found that captive deer have escaped 
from one-third of the state's 550 deer farms over the lifetime of the 
operations. The agency also uncovered hundreds of violations and has sought a 
total of 60 citations or charges against deer farm operators.
Hundreds of deer escape
The DNR found a total of 671 deer that escaped farms - 436 of which were 
never found - because of storm-damaged fences, gates being left open or the 
animals jumping over or through fences.
In one example in Kewaunee County, a deer farmer's fence was knocked down 
in a summer storm. Ten deer escaped, and the farmer told the DNR he had no 
intention of trying to reclaim them. The DNR found five of the deer, killed them 
and cited the farmer for violation of a regulation related to fencing.
Another deer farmer near Mishicot, in Manitowoc County, released all nine 
of his whitetails last summer after he believed the discovery of chronic wasting 
disease was going to drive down the market for captive deer.
The DNR found 24 instances of unlicensed deer farms and issued 19 
citations.
Game Farms Inspected
A summary of the findings of the Department of Natural Resources' 
inspection of 550 private white-tailed deer farms in the state: The deer farms 
contained at least 16,070 deer, but the DNR believes there are more deer in 
captivity than that because large deer farms are unable to accurately count 
their deer. 671 deer had escaped from game farms, including 436 that were never 
found.
24 farmers were unlicensed. One had been operating illegally since 1999 
after he was denied a license because his deer fence did not meet minimum 
specifications.
Records maintained by operators ranged from "meticulous documentation to 
relying on memory." At least 227 farms conducted various portions of their deer 
farm business with cash. Over the last three years, 1,222 deer died on farms for 
various reasons. Disease testing was not performed nor required on the majority 
of deer. Farmers reported doing business with people in 22 other states and one 
Canadian province. ..
Wednesday, March 04, 2015 
Disease sampling results provide current snapshot of CWD in Wisconsin 
finding 324 positive detections statewide in 2014 
Tuesday, February 11, 2014 *** Wisconsin tracks 81 deer from game farm with 
CWD buck to seven other states http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2014/02/wisconsin-tracks-81-deer-from-game-farm.html 
For Immediate Release Thursday, October 2, 2014 
Dustin Vande Hoef 515/281-3375 or 515/326-1616 (cell) or 
Dustin.VandeHoef@IowaAgriculture.gov
TEST RESULTS FROM CAPTIVE DEER HERD WITH CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE RELEASED 
79.8 percent of the deer tested positive for the disease
DES MOINES – The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship today 
announced that the test results from the depopulation of a quarantined captive 
deer herd in north-central Iowa showed that 284 of the 356 deer, or 79.8% of the 
herd, tested positive for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). The owners of the 
quarantined herd have entered into a fence maintenance agreement with the Iowa 
Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship,which requires the owners to 
maintain the 8’ foot perimeter fence around the herd premises for five years 
after the depopulation was complete and the premises had been cleaned and 
disinfected CWD is a progressive, fatal, degenerative neurological disease of 
farmed and free-ranging deer, elk, and moose. There is no known treatment or 
vaccine for CWD. CWD is not a disease that affects humans.On July 18, 2012, USDA 
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS)National Veterinary Services 
Lab in Ames, IA confirmed that a male whitetail deer harvested from a hunting 
preserve in southeast IA was positive for CWD. An investigation revealed that 
this animal had just been introduced into the hunting preserve from the 
above-referenced captive deer herd in north-central Iowa.The captive deer herd 
was immediately quarantined to prevent the spread of CWD. The herd has remained 
in quarantine until its depopulation on August 25 to 27, 2014.The Iowa 
Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship participated in a joint operation 
to depopulate the infected herd with USDA Veterinary Services, which was the 
lead agency, and USDA Wildlife Services.Federal indemnity funding became 
available in 2014. USDA APHIS appraised the captive deer herd of 376 animals at 
that time, which was before depopulation and testing, at $1,354,250. At that 
time a herd plan was developed with the owners and officials from USDA and the 
Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship.Once the depopulation was 
complete and the premises had been cleaned and disinfected, indemnity of 
$917,100.00 from the USDA has been or will be paid to the owners as compensation 
for the 356 captive deer depopulated.The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land 
Stewardship operates a voluntary CWD program for farms that sell live animals. 
Currently 145 Iowa farms participate in the voluntary program. The 
above-referenced captive deer facility left the voluntary CWD program prior to 
the discovery of the disease as they had stopped selling live animals. All deer 
harvested in a hunting preserve must be tested for CWD. -30-
*** see history of this CWD blunder here ; 
On June 5, 2013, DNR conducted a fence inspection, after gaining approval 
from surrounding landowners, and confirmed that the fenced had beencut or 
removed in at least four separate locations; that the fence had degraded and was 
failing to maintain the enclosure around the Quarantined Premises in at least 
one area; that at least three gates had been opened;and that deer tracks were 
visible in and around one of the open areas in the sand on both sides of the 
fence, evidencing movement of deer into the Quarantined Premises.
 as disgusting as this may be, the slaughter must happen, it’s the only way 
to date, with cwd tse prion disease.
all cervid tested after slaughter, and test results must be released to the 
public.
the tse prion aka mad cow type disease is not your normal pathogen.
I have seen it. my mother died from confirmed hvCJD dod 12/14/97. just made 
a promise to mom. never forget, and never let them forget. 
the science is there. but the politics will not allow the science to be 
brought forth. 
I have followed this debacle daily for 17 some odd years. 
here is the rest of this nightmare if you want the facts...
kind regards, terry 
The TSE prion disease survives ashing to 600 degrees celsius, that’s around 
1112 degrees farenheit. 
you cannot cook the TSE prion disease out of meat. 
you can take the ash and mix it with saline and inject that ash into a 
mouse, and the mouse will go down with TSE. 
Prion Infected Meat-and-Bone Meal Is Still Infectious after Biodiesel 
Production as well. 
the TSE prion agent also survives Simulated Wastewater Treatment Processes. 
IN fact, you should also know that the TSE Prion agent will survive in the 
environment for years, if not decades. 
you can bury it and it will not go away. 
The TSE agent is capable of infected your water table i.e. Detection of 
protease-resistant cervid prion protein in water from a CWD-endemic area. 
it’s not your ordinary pathogen you can just cook it out and be done with. 
that’s what’s so worrisome about Iatrogenic mode of transmission, a simple 
autoclave will not kill this TSE prion agent. 
New studies on the heat resistance of hamster-adapted scrapie agent: 
Threshold survival after ashing at 600°C suggests an inorganic template of 
replication 
The infectious agents responsible for transmissible spongiform 
encephalopathy (TSE) are notoriously resistant to most physical and chemical 
methods used for inactivating pathogens, including heat. It has long been 
recognized, for example, that boiling is ineffective and that higher 
temperatures are most efficient when combined with steam under pressure (i.e., 
autoclaving). As a means of decontamination, dry heat is used only at the 
extremely high temperatures achieved during incineration, usually in excess of 
600°C. It has been assumed, without proof, that incineration totally inactivates 
the agents of TSE, whether of human or animal origin. 
Prion Infected Meat-and-Bone Meal Is Still Infectious after Biodiesel 
Production 
Histochemical analysis of hamster brains inoculated with the solid residue 
showed typical spongiform degeneration and vacuolation. Re-inoculation of these 
brains into a new cohort of hamsters led to onset of clinical scrapie symptoms 
within 75 days, suggesting that the specific infectivity of the prion protein 
was not changed during the biodiesel process. The biodiesel reaction cannot be 
considered a viable prion decontamination method for MBM, although we observed 
increased survival time of hamsters and reduced infectivity greater than 6 log 
orders in the solid MBM residue. Furthermore, results from our study compare for 
the first time prion detection by Western Blot versus an infectivity bioassay 
for analysis of biodiesel reaction products. We could show that biochemical 
analysis alone is insufficient for detection of prion infectivity after a 
biodiesel process. 
Detection of protease-resistant cervid prion protein in water from a 
CWD-endemic area 
The data presented here demonstrate that sPMCA can detect low levels of 
PrPCWD in the environment, corroborate previous biological and experimental data 
suggesting long term persistence of prions in the environment2,3 and imply that 
PrPCWD accumulation over time may contribute to transmission of CWD in areas 
where it has been endemic for decades. This work demonstrates the utility of 
sPMCA to evaluate other environmental water sources for PrPCWD, including 
smaller bodies of water such as vernal pools and wallows, where large numbers of 
cervids congregate and into which prions from infected animals may be shed and 
concentrated to infectious levels. 
A Quantitative Assessment of the Amount of Prion Diverted to Category 1 
Materials and Wastewater During Processing 
Keywords:Abattoir;bovine spongiform encephalopathy;QRA;scrapie;TSE
In this article the development and parameterization of a quantitative 
assessment is described that estimates the amount of TSE infectivity that is 
present in a whole animal carcass (bovine spongiform encephalopathy [BSE] for 
cattle and classical/atypical scrapie for sheep and lambs) and the amounts that 
subsequently fall to the floor during processing at facilities that handle 
specified risk material (SRM). BSE in cattle was found to contain the most oral 
doses, with a mean of 9864 BO ID50s (310, 38840) in a whole carcass compared to 
a mean of 1851 OO ID50s (600, 4070) and 614 OO ID50s (155, 1509) for a sheep 
infected with classical and atypical scrapie, respectively. Lambs contained the 
least infectivity with a mean of 251 OO ID50s (83, 548) for classical scrapie 
and 1 OO ID50s (0.2, 2) for atypical scrapie. The highest amounts of infectivity 
falling to the floor and entering the drains from slaughtering a whole carcass 
at SRM facilities were found to be from cattle infected with BSE at rendering 
and large incineration facilities with 7.4 BO ID50s (0.1, 29), intermediate 
plants and small incinerators with a mean of 4.5 BO ID50s (0.1, 18), and 
collection centers, 3.6 BO ID50s (0.1, 14). The lowest amounts entering drains 
are from lambs infected with classical and atypical scrapie at intermediate 
plants and atypical scrapie at collection centers with a mean of 3 × 10−7 OO 
ID50s (2 × 10−8, 1 × 10−6) per carcass. The results of this model provide key 
inputs for the model in the companion paper published here. 
*** Infectious agent of sheep scrapie may persist in the environment for at 
least 16 years*** 
Gudmundur Georgsson1, Sigurdur Sigurdarson2 and Paul Brown3 
Longitudinal Detection of Prion Shedding in Saliva and Urine by 
CWD-Infected Deer by RT-QuIC 
Davin M. Henderson1, Nathaniel D. Denkers1, Clare E. Hoover1, Nina 
Garbino1, Candace K. Mathiason1 and Edward A. Hoover1# + Author 
Affiliations
1Prion Research Center, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and 
Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado 
State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 ABSTRACT Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) 
is an emergent, rapidly spreading prion disease of cervids. Shedding of 
infectious prions in saliva and urine is thought to be an important factor in 
CWD transmission. To help elucidate this issue, we applied an in vitro 
amplification assay to determine the onset, duration, and magnitude of prion 
shedding in longitudinally collected saliva and urine samples from CWD-exposed 
white-tailed deer. We detected prion shedding as early as 3 months after CWD 
exposure and sustained shedding throughout the disease course. We estimated that 
a 50% lethal dose (LD50) for cervidized transgenic mice would be contained in 1 
ml of infected deer saliva or 10 ml or urine. Given the average course of 
infection and daily production of these body fluids, an infected deer would shed 
thousands of prion infectious dosesover the course of CWD infection. The direct 
and indirect environmental impact of this magnitude of prion shedding for cervid 
and non-cervid species is surely significant. 
Importance: Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is an emerging and uniformly 
fatal prion disease affecting free ranging deer and elk and now recognized in 22 
United States and 2 C anadian Provinces. It is unique among prion diseases in 
that it is transmitted naturally though wild populations. A major hypothesis for 
CWD's florid spread is that prions are shed in excreta and transmitted via 
direct or indirect environmental contact. Here we use a rapid in vitro assay to 
show that infectious doses of CWD prions are in fact shed throughout the 
multi-year disease course in deer. This finding is an important advance in 
assessing the risks posed by shed CWD prions to animals as well as humans. 
FOOTNOTES
↵#To whom correspondence should be addressed: Edward A. Hoover, Prion 
Research Center, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado 
State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, US Email: edward.hoover@colostate.edu 
Approximately 4,200 fawns, defined as deer under 1 year of age, were 
sampled from the eradication zone over the last year. The majority of fawns 
sampled were between the ages of 5 to 9 months, though some were as young as 1 
month. Two of the six fawns with CWD detected were 5 to 6 months old. All six of 
the positive fawns were taken from the core area of the CWD eradication zone 
where the highest numbers of positive deer have been identified. 
"This is the first intensive sampling for CWD in fawns anywhere," said Dr. 
Julie Langenberg, Department of Natural Resources wildlife veterinarian, "and we 
are trying to learn as much as we can from these data". 
Saturday, February 04, 2012 
Wisconsin 16 MONTH age limit on testing dead deer Game Farm CWD Testing 
Protocol Needs To Be Revised 
Articles of Significant Interest Selected from This Issue by the Editors 
Next Section Prions in the Blood of Infected Hosts: Early and Persistent Prions 
circulate in the blood of prion-infected hosts, including humans with variant 
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Determining the parameters of blood-borne prions 
during the long asymptomatic phase of disease characteristic of all prion 
diseases has been a long-standing problem in prion biology. Elder et. al (p. 
7421–7424) have demonstrated amyloid formation, a biomarker for prions, in the 
blood of prion-infected rodent and cervid hosts as early as 15 minutes 
post-mucosal or -intravenous infection. This prionemia persists throughout the 
disease course, indicating a role for hematogenous prions throughout the 
preclinical stage of illness. 
***Immediate and Ongoing Detection of Prions in the Blood of Hamsters and 
Deer following Oral, Nasal, or Blood Inoculations 
Alan M. Eldera, Davin M. Hendersona, Amy V. Nallsa, Edward A. Hoovera, 
Anthony E. Kincaidb,c, Jason C. Bartzb and Candace K. Mathiasona aDepartment of 
Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 
Colorado, USA bMedical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, Omaha, 
Nebraska, USA cDepartment of Pharmacy Sciences, Creighton University, Omaha, 
Nebraska, USA S. Perlman, Editor + Author Affiliations
what about CWD infection rates on some of these game farms ???
CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD WISCONSIN Almond Deer (Buckhorn Flats) 
FarmUpdate DECEMBER 2011The CWD infection rate was nearly 80%, the highest ever 
in a North American captive herd. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the 
purchase of 80acres of land for $465,000 for the Statewide Wildlife Habitat 
Program inPortage County and approve the restrictions on public use of the 
site.SUMMARY:
For Immediate Release Thursday, October 2, 2014 
Dustin Vande Hoef 515/281-3375 or 515/326-1616 (cell) or 
Dustin.VandeHoef@IowaAgriculture.gov
TEST RESULTS FROM CAPTIVE DEER HERD WITH CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE RELEASED 
79.8 percent of the deer tested positive for the disease
DES MOINES – The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship today 
announced that the test results from the depopulation of a quarantined captive 
deer herd in north-central Iowa showed that 284 of the 356 deer, or 79.8% of the 
herd, tested positive for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). The owners of the 
quarantined herd have entered into a fence maintenance agreement with the Iowa 
Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship,which requires the owners to 
maintain the 8’ foot perimeter fence around the herd premises for five years 
after the depopulation was complete and the premises had been cleaned and 
disinfected CWD is a progressive, fatal, degenerative neurological disease of 
farmed and free-ranging deer, elk, and moose. There is no known treatment or 
vaccine for CWD. CWD is not a disease that affects humans.On July 18, 2012, USDA 
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS)National Veterinary Services 
Lab in Ames, IA confirmed that a male whitetail deer harvested from a hunting 
preserve in southeast IA was positive for CWD. An investigation revealed that 
this animal had just been introduced into the hunting preserve from the 
above-referenced captive deer herd in north-central Iowa.The captive deer herd 
was immediately quarantined to prevent the spread of CWD. The herd has remained 
in quarantine until its depopulation on August 25 to 27, 2014.The Iowa 
Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship participated in a joint operation 
to depopulate the infected herd with USDA Veterinary Services, which was the 
lead agency, and USDA Wildlife Services.Federal indemnity funding became 
available in 2014. USDA APHIS appraised the captive deer herd of 376 animals at 
that time, which was before depopulation and testing, at $1,354,250. At that 
time a herd plan was developed with the owners and officials from USDA and the 
Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship.Once the depopulation was 
complete and the premises had been cleaned and disinfected, indemnity of 
$917,100.00 from the USDA has been or will be paid to the owners as compensation 
for the 356 captive deer depopulated.The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land 
Stewardship operates a voluntary CWD program for farms that sell live animals. 
Currently 145 Iowa farms participate in the voluntary program. The 
above-referenced captive deer facility left the voluntary CWD program prior to 
the discovery of the disease as they had stopped selling live animals. All deer 
harvested in a hunting preserve must be tested for CWD. -30-
*** see history of this CWD blunder here ; 
On June 5, 2013, DNR conducted a fence inspection, after gaining approval 
from surrounding landowners, and confirmed that the fenced had beencut or 
removed in at least four separate locations; that the fence had degraded and was 
failing to maintain the enclosure around the Quarantined Premises in at least 
one area; that at least three gates had been opened;and that deer tracks were 
visible in and around one of the open areas in the sand on both sides of the 
fence, evidencing movement of deer into the Quarantined Premises.
Friday, December 14, 2012 
DEFRA U.K. What is the risk of Chronic Wasting Disease CWD being introduced 
into Great Britain? A Qualitative Risk Assessment October 2012 
snip... 
In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administration’s BSE Feed Regulation 
(21 CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin) 
from deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With 
regards to feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may 
not be used for any animal feed or feed ingredients. For elk and deer considered 
at high risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not enter the 
animal feed system. However, this recommendation is guidance and not a 
requirement by law. 
Animals considered at high risk for CWD include: 
1) animals from areas declared to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD 
eradication zones and 
2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month period prior to 
slaughter were in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal. 
Therefore, in the USA, materials from cervids other than CWD positive 
animals may be used in animal feed and feed ingredients for non-ruminants. 
The amount of animal PAP that is of deer and/or elk origin imported from 
the USA to GB can not be determined, however, as it is not specified in TRACES. 
It may constitute a small percentage of the 8412 kilos of non-fish origin 
processed animal proteins that were imported from US into GB in 2011. 
Overall, therefore, it is considered there is a __greater than negligible 
risk___ that (nonruminant) animal feed and pet food containing deer and/or elk 
protein is imported into GB. 
There is uncertainty associated with this estimate given the lack of data 
on the amount of deer and/or elk protein possibly being imported in these 
products. 
snip... 
36% in 2007 (Almberg et al., 2011). In such areas, population declines of 
deer of up to 30 to 50% have been observed (Almberg et al., 2011). In areas of 
Colorado, the prevalence can be as high as 30% (EFSA, 2011). The clinical signs 
of CWD in affected adults are weight loss and behavioural changes that can span 
weeks or months (Williams, 2005). In addition, signs might include excessive 
salivation, behavioural alterations including a fixed stare and changes in 
interaction with other animals in the herd, and an altered stance (Williams, 
2005). These signs are indistinguishable from cervids experimentally infected 
with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Given this, if CWD was to be 
introduced into countries with BSE such as GB, for example, infected deer 
populations would need to be tested to differentiate if they were infected with 
CWD or BSE to minimise the risk of BSE entering the human food-chain via 
affected venison. 
snip... 
The rate of transmission of CWD has been reported to be as high as 30% and 
can approach 100% among captive animals in endemic areas (Safar et al., 2008). 
snip... 
In summary, in endemic areas, there is a medium probability that the soil 
and surrounding environment is contaminated with CWD prions and in a 
bioavailable form. In rural areas where CWD has not been reported and deer are 
present, there is a greater than negligible risk the soil is contaminated with 
CWD prion. 
snip... 
In summary, given the volume of tourists, hunters and servicemen moving 
between GB and North America, the probability of at least one person travelling 
to/from a CWD affected area and, in doing so, contaminating their clothing, 
footwear and/or equipment prior to arriving in GB is greater than negligible. 
For deer hunters, specifically, the risk is likely to be greater given the 
increased contact with deer and their environment. However, there is significant 
uncertainty associated with these estimates. 
snip... 
Therefore, it is considered that farmed and park deer may have a higher 
probability of exposure to CWD transferred to the environment than wild deer 
given the restricted habitat range and higher frequency of contact with tourists 
and returning GB residents. 
snip... 
Friday, December 14, 2012 
DEFRA U.K. What is the risk of Chronic Wasting Disease CWD being introduced 
into Great Britain? A Qualitative Risk Assessment October 2012 
CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION, how much does it pay to find CWD 
$$$
CWD, spreading it around...
for the game farm industry, and their constituents, to continue to believe 
that they are _NOT_, and or insinuate that they have _NEVER_ been part of the 
problem, will only continue to help spread cwd. the game farming industry, from 
the shooting pens, to the urine mills, the antler mills, the sperm mills, velvet 
mills, shooting pens, to large ranches, are not the only problem, but it is 
painfully obvious that they have been part of the problem for decades and 
decades, just spreading it around, as with transportation and or exportation and 
or importation of cervids from game farming industry, and have been proven to 
spread cwd. no one need to look any further than South Korea blunder ; 
=========================================== 
spreading cwd around...
Between 1996 and 2002, chronic wasting disease was diagnosed in 39 herds of 
farmed elk in Saskatchewan in a single epidemic. All of these herds were 
depopulated as part of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s (CFIA) disease 
eradication program. Animals, primarily over 12 mo of age, were tested for the 
presence CWD prions following euthanasia. Twenty-one of the herds were linked 
through movements of live animals with latent CWD from a single infected source 
herd in Saskatchewan, 17 through movements of animals from 7 of the secondarily 
infected herds. 
***The source herd is believed to have become infected via importation of 
animals from a game farm in South Dakota where CWD was subsequently diagnosed 
(7,4). A wide range in herd prevalence of CWD at the time of herd depopulation 
of these herds was observed. Within-herd transmission was observed on some 
farms, while the disease remained confined to the introduced animals on other 
farms. 
spreading cwd around...
Friday, May 13, 2011 
Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) outbreaks and surveillance program in the 
Republic of Korea 
Hyun-Joo Sohn, Yoon-Hee Lee, Min-jeong Kim, Eun-Im Yun, Hyo-Jin Kim, 
Won-Yong Lee, Dong-Seob Tark, In- Soo Cho, Foreign Animal Disease Research 
Division, National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service, Republic of Korea 
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) has been recognized as an important prion 
disease in native North America deer and Rocky mountain elks. The disease is a 
unique member of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), which 
naturally affects only a few species. CWD had been limited to USA and Canada 
until 2000. 
On 28 December 2000, information from the Canadian government showed that a 
total of 95 elk had been exported from farms with CWD to Korea. These consisted 
of 23 elk in 1994 originating from the so-called “source farm” in Canada, and 72 
elk in 1997, which had been held in pre export quarantine at the “source 
farm”.Based on export information of CWD suspected elk from Canada to Korea, CWD 
surveillance program was initiated by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 
(MAF) in 2001. 
All elks imported in 1997 were traced back, however elks imported in 1994 
were impossible to identify. CWD control measures included stamping out of all 
animals in the affected farm, and thorough cleaning and disinfection of the 
premises. In addition, nationwide clinical surveillance of Korean native 
cervids, and improved measures to ensure reporting of CWD suspect cases were 
implemented. 
Total of 9 elks were found to be affected. CWD was designated as a 
notifiable disease under the Act for Prevention of Livestock Epidemics in 2002. 
Additional CWD cases - 12 elks and 2 elks - were diagnosed in 2004 and 
2005. 
Since February of 2005, when slaughtered elks were found to be positive, 
all slaughtered cervid for human consumption at abattoirs were designated as 
target of the CWD surveillance program. Currently, CWD laboratory testing is 
only conducted by National Reference Laboratory on CWD, which is the Foreign 
Animal Disease Division (FADD) of National Veterinary Research and Quarantine 
Service (NVRQS). 
In July 2010, one out of 3 elks from Farm 1 which were slaughtered for the 
human consumption was confirmed as positive. Consequently, all cervid – 54 elks, 
41 Sika deer and 5 Albino deer – were culled and one elk was found to be 
positive. Epidemiological investigations were conducted by Veterinary 
Epidemiology Division (VED) of NVRQS in collaboration with provincial veterinary 
services. 
Epidemiologically related farms were found as 3 farms and all cervid at 
these farms were culled and subjected to CWD diagnosis. Three elks and 5 
crossbreeds (Red deer and Sika deer) were confirmed as positive at farm 2. 
All cervids at Farm 3 and Farm 4 – 15 elks and 47 elks – were culled and 
confirmed as negative. 
Further epidemiological investigations showed that these CWD outbreaks were 
linked to the importation of elks from Canada in 1994 based on circumstantial 
evidences. 
In December 2010, one elk was confirmed as positive at Farm 5. 
Consequently, all cervid – 3 elks, 11 Manchurian Sika deer and 20 Sika deer – 
were culled and one Manchurian Sika deer and seven Sika deer were found to be 
positive. This is the first report of CWD in these sub-species of deer. 
Epidemiological investigations found that the owner of the Farm 2 in CWD 
outbreaks in July 2010 had co-owned the Farm 5. 
In addition, it was newly revealed that one positive elk was introduced 
from Farm 6 of Jinju-si Gyeongsang Namdo. All cervid – 19 elks, 15 crossbreed 
(species unknown) and 64 Sika deer – of Farm 6 were culled, but all confirmed as 
negative. 
*** LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACTS PRION 2015 CONFERENCE ***
O18
Zoonotic Potential of CWD Prions
Liuting Qing1, Ignazio Cali1,2, Jue Yuan1, Shenghai Huang3, Diane Kofskey1, 
Pierluigi Gambetti1, Wenquan Zou1, Qingzhong Kong1 1Case Western Reserve 
University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy, 
3Encore Health Resources, Houston, Texas, USA
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a widespread and expanding prion disease 
in free-ranging and captive cervid species in North America. The zoonotic 
potential of CWD prions is a serious public health concern. Current literature 
generated with in vitro methods and in vivo animal models (transgenic mice, 
macaques and squirrel monkeys) reports conflicting results. The susceptibility 
of human CNS and peripheral organs to CWD prions remains largely unresolved. In 
our earlier bioassay experiments using several humanized transgenic mouse lines, 
we detected protease-resistant PrPSc in the spleen of two out of 140 mice that 
were intracerebrally inoculated with natural CWD isolates, but PrPSc was not 
detected in the brain of the same mice. Secondary passages with such 
PrPSc-positive CWD-inoculated humanized mouse spleen tissues led to efficient 
prion transmission with clear clinical and pathological signs in both humanized 
and cervidized transgenic mice. Furthermore, a recent bioassay with natural CWD 
isolates in a new humanized transgenic mouse line led to clinical prion 
infection in 2 out of 20 mice. These results indicate that the CWD prion has the 
potential to infect human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there 
might be asymptomatic human carriers of CWD infection. 
================== 
***These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect 
human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic 
human carriers of CWD infection.*** 
================== 
P.105: RT-QuIC models trans-species prion transmission
Kristen Davenport, Davin Henderson, Candace Mathiason, and Edward Hoover 
Prion Research Center; Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO USA
The propensity for trans-species prion transmission is related to the 
structural characteristics of the enciphering and heterologous PrP, but the 
exact mechanism remains mostly mysterious. Studies of the effects of primary or 
tertiary prion protein structures on trans-species prion transmission have 
relied primarily upon animal bioassays, making the influence of prion protein 
structure vs. host co-factors (e.g. cellular constituents, trafficking, and 
innate immune interactions) difficult to dissect. As an alternative strategy, we 
used real-time quakinginduced conversion (RT-QuIC) to investigate trans-species 
prion conversion.
To assess trans-species conversion in the RT-QuIC system, we compared 
chronic wasting disease (CWD) and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) prions, 
as well as feline CWD (fCWD) and feline spongiform encephalopathy (FSE). Each 
prion was seeded into each host recombinant PrP (full-length rPrP of 
white-tailed deer, bovine or feline). We demonstrated that fCWD is a more 
efficient seed for feline rPrP than for white-tailed deer rPrP, which suggests 
adaptation to the new host.
Conversely, FSE maintained sufficient BSE characteristics to more 
efficiently convert bovine rPrP than feline rPrP. Additionally, human rPrP was 
competent for conversion by CWD and fCWD. ***This insinuates that, at the level 
of protein:protein interactions, the barrier preventing transmission of CWD to 
humans is less robust than previously estimated.
================
***This insinuates that, at the level of protein:protein interactions, the 
barrier preventing transmission of CWD to humans is less robust than previously 
estimated.***
================ 
Willingham, Erin McNulty, Kelly Anderson, Jeanette Hayes-Klug, Amy Nalls, 
and Candace Mathiason Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO USA
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is the transmissible spongiform 
encephalopathy (TSE), of free-ranging and captive cervids (deer, elk and moose). 
The presence of infectious prions in the tissues, bodily fluids and 
environments of clinical and preclinical CWD-infected animals is thought to 
account for its high transmission efficiency. Recently it has been recognized 
that mother to offspring transmission may contribute to the facile transmission 
of some TSEs. Although the mechanism behind maternal transmission is not yet 
known, the extended asymptomatic TSE carrier phase (lasting years to decades) 
suggests that it may have implications in the spread of prions.
Placental trafficking and/or secretion in milk are 2 means by which 
maternal prion transmission may occur. In these studies we explore these avenues 
during early and late infection using a transgenic mouse model expressing cervid 
prion protein. Na€ıve and CWD-infected dams were bred at both timepoints, and 
were allowed to bear and raise their offspring. Milk was collected from the dams 
for prion analysis, and the offspring were observed for TSE disease progression. 
Terminal tissues harvested from both dams and offspring were analyzed for 
prions.
We have demonstrated that 
(1) CWDinfected TgCerPRP females successfully breed and bear offspring, and 
(2) the presence of PrPCWD in reproductive and mammary tissue from 
CWD-infected dams. 
We are currently analyzing terminal tissue harvested from offspring born to 
CWD-infected dams for the detection of PrPCWD and amplification competent 
prions. These studies will provide insight into the potential mechanisms and 
biological significance associated with mother to offspring transmission of 
TSEs.
============== 
P.157: Uptake of prions into plants
Christopher Johnson1, Christina Carlson1, Matthew Keating1,2, Nicole 
Gibbs1, Haeyoon Chang1, Jamie Wiepz1, and Joel Pedersen1 1USGS National Wildlife 
Health Center; Madison, WI USA; 2University of Wisconsin - Madison; Madison, WI 
USA
Soil may preserve chronic wasting disease (CWD) and scrapie infectivity in 
the environment, making consumption or inhalation of soil particles a plausible 
mechanism whereby na€ıve animals can be exposed to prions. Plants are known to 
absorb a variety of substances from soil, including whole proteins, yet the 
potential for plants to take up abnormal prion protein (PrPTSE) and preserve 
prion infectivity is not known. In this study, we assessed PrPTSE uptake into 
roots using laser scanning confocal microscopy with fluorescently tagged PrPTSE 
and we used serial protein misfolding cyclic amplification (sPMCA) and detect 
and quantify PrPTSE levels in plant aerial tissues. Fluorescence was identified 
in the root hairs of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, as well as the crop 
plants alfalfa (Medicago sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and tomato (Solanum 
lycopersicum) upon exposure to tagged PrPTSE but not a tagged control 
preparation. Using sPMCA, we found evidence of PrPTSE in aerial tissues of A. 
thaliana, alfalfa and maize (Zea mays) grown in hydroponic cultures in which 
only roots were exposed to PrPTSE. Levels of PrPTSE in plant aerial tissues 
ranged from approximately 4 £ 10 ¡10 to 1 £ 10 ¡9 g PrPTSE g ¡1 plant dry weight 
or 2 £ 105 to 7 £ 106 intracerebral ID50 units g ¡1 plant dry weight. Both stems 
and leaves of A. thaliana grown in culture media containing prions are 
infectious when intracerebrally-injected into mice. ***Our results suggest that 
prions can be taken up by plants and that contaminated plants may represent a 
previously unrecognized risk of human, domestic species and wildlife exposure to 
prions.
===========
***Our results suggest that prions can be taken up by plants and that 
contaminated plants may represent a previously unrecognized risk of human, 
domestic species and wildlife exposure to prions.***
SEE ;
Friday, May 15, 2015 
Grass Plants Bind, Retain, Uptake, and Transport Infectious Prions 
Report 
============ 
P.19: Characterization of chronic wasting disease isolates from freeranging 
deer (Odocoileus sp) in Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada
Camilo Duque Velasquez1, Chiye Kim1, Nathalie Daude1, Jacques van der 
Merwe1, Allen Herbst1, Trent Bollinger2, Judd Aiken1, and Debbie McKenzie1 
1Centre for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases; University of Alberta; 
Edmonton, Canada; 2Western College of Veterinary Medicine; University of 
Saskatchewan; Saskatoon, Canada
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is an emerging prion disease of free ranging 
and captive species of Cervidae. In North America, CWD is enzootic in some wild 
cervid populations and can circulate among different deer species. The 
contagious nature of CWD prions and the variation of cervid PRNP alleles, which 
influence host susceptibility, can result in the emergence and adaptation of 
different CWD strains. These strains may impact transmission host range, disease 
diagnosis, spread dynamics and efficacy of potential vaccines. We are 
characterizing different CWD agents by biochemical analysis of the PrPCWD 
conformers, propagation in vitro cell assays1 and by comparing transmission 
properties and neuropathology in Tg33 (Q95G96) and Tg60 (Q95S96) mice.2 Although 
Tg60 mice expressing S96- PrPC have been shown resistant to CWD infectivity from 
various cervid species,2,3 
***these transgenic mice are susceptible to H95 C CWD, a CWD strain derived 
from experimental infection of deer expressing H95G96-PrPC. The diversity of 
strains present in free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed 
deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from Alberta and Saskatchewan is being determined 
and will allow us to delineate the properties of CWD agents circulating in CWD 
enzootic cervid populations of Canada.
References
1. van der Merwe J, Aiken J, Westaway D, McKenzie D. The standard scrapie 
cell assay: Development, utility and prospects. Viruses 2015; 7(1):180–198; 
PMID:25602372; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v7010180
2. Meade-White K, Race B, Trifilo M, Bossers A, Favara C, Lacasse R, Miller 
M, Williams E, Oldstone M, Race R, Chesebro B. Resistance to chronic wasting 
disease in transgenic mice expressing a naturally occurring allelic variant of 
deer prion protein. J Virol 2007; 81(9):4533–4539; PMID: 17314157; http://dx. doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02762-06
3. Race B, Meade-White K, Miller MW, Fox KA, Chesebro B. In vivo comparison 
of chronic wasting disease infectivity from deer with variation at prion protein 
residue 96. J Virol 2011; 85(17):9235–9238; PMID: 21697479; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00790-11
=========
***these transgenic mice are susceptible to H95 C CWD, a CWD strain derived 
from experimental infection of deer expressing H95G96-PrPC.
========== 
P.136: Mother to offspring transmission of CWD—Detection in fawn tissues 
using the QuIC assay
Amy Nalls, Erin McNulty, Clare Hoover, Jeanette Hayes-Klug, Kelly Anderson, 
Edward Hoover, and Candace Mathiason Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO 
USA
To investigate the role mother to offspring transmission plays in chronic 
wasting disease (CWD), we have employed a small, polyestrous breeding, indoor 
maintainable cervid model, the Reeves’ muntjac deer. Muntjac doe were inoculated 
with CWD and tested positive by lymphoid biopsy at 4 months post inoculation. 
From these CWD-infected doe, we obtained 3 viable fawns. These fawns tested 
IHC-positive for CWD by lymphoid biopsy as early as 40 d post birth, and all 
have been euthanized due to clinical disease at 31, 34 and 59 months post birth. 
The QuIC assay demonstrates sensitivity and specificity in the detection of 
conversion competent prions in peripheral IHC-positive tissues including tonsil, 
mandibular, partotid, retropharyngeal, and prescapular lymph nodes, adrenal 
gland, spleen and liver. In summary, using the muntjac deer model, we have 
demonstrated CWD clinical disease in offspring born to CWD-infected doe and 
found that the QuIC assay is an effective tool in the detection of prions in 
peripheral tissues. ***Our findings demonstrate that transmission of prions from 
mother to offspring can occur, and may be underestimated for all prion 
diseases.
===============
***Our findings demonstrate that transmission of prions from mother to 
offspring can occur, and may be underestimated for all prion diseases. 
===============
I strenuously once again urge the FDA and its industry constituents, to 
make it MANDATORY that all ruminant feed be banned to all ruminants, and this 
should include all cervids as soon as possible for the following 
reasons...
======
In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administrations BSE Feed Regulation (21 
CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin) from 
deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With regards to 
feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may not be used 
for any animal feed or feed ingredients. For elk and deer considered at high 
risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not enter the animal feed 
system. 
***However, this recommendation is guidance and not a requirement by law. 
======
31 Jan 2015 at 20:14 GMT 
*** Ruminant feed ban for cervids in the United States? ***
31 Jan 2015 at 20:14 GMT 
Friday, May 22, 2015 
*** Chronic Wasting Disease and Program Updates - 2014 NEUSAHA Annual 
Meeting 12-14 May 2014 ***
Saturday, May 30, 2015 
PRION 2015 ORAL AND POSTER CONGRESSIONAL ABSTRACTS 
98 | Veterinary Record | January 24, 2015
EDITORIAL
Scrapie: a particularly persistent pathogen
Cristina Acín
Resistant prions in the environment have been the sword of Damocles for 
scrapie control and eradication. Attempts to establish which physical and 
chemical agents could be applied to inactivate or moderate scrapie infectivity 
were initiated in the 1960s and 1970s,with the first study of this type focusing 
on the effect of heat treatment in reducing prion infectivity (Hunter and 
Millson 1964). Nowadays, most of the chemical procedures that aim to inactivate 
the prion protein are based on the method developed by Kimberlin and 
collaborators (1983). This procedure consists of treatment with 20,000 parts per 
million free chlorine solution, for a minimum of one hour, of all surfaces that 
need to be sterilised (in laboratories, lambing pens, slaughterhouses, and so 
on). Despite this, veterinarians and farmers may still ask a range of questions, 
such as ‘Is there an official procedure published somewhere?’ and ‘Is there an 
international organisation which recommends and defines the exact method of 
scrapie decontamination that must be applied?’
From a European perspective, it is difficult to find a treatment that could 
be applied, especially in relation to the disinfection of surfaces in lambing 
pens of affected flocks. A 999/2001 EU regulation on controlling spongiform 
encephalopathies (European Parliament and Council 2001) did not specify a 
particular decontamination measure to be used when an outbreak of scrapie is 
diagnosed. There is only a brief recommendation in Annex VII concerning the 
control and eradication of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE 
s).
Chapter B of the regulation explains the measures that must be applied if 
new caprine animals are to be introduced to a holding where a scrapie outbreak 
has previously been diagnosed. In that case, the statement indicates that 
caprine animals can be introduced ‘provided that a cleaning and disinfection of 
all animal housing on the premises has been carried out following 
destocking’.
Issues around cleaning and disinfection are common in prion prevention 
recommendations, but relevant authorities, veterinarians and farmers may have 
difficulties in finding the specific protocol which applies. The European Food 
and Safety Authority (EFSA ) published a detailed report about the efficacy of 
certain biocides, such as sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite, guanidine and 
even a formulation of copper or iron metal ions in combination with hydrogen 
peroxide, against prions (EFSA 2009). The report was based on scientific 
evidence (Fichet and others 2004, Lemmer and others 2004, Gao and others 2006, 
Solassol and others 2006) but unfortunately the decontamination measures were 
not assessed under outbreak conditions.
The EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards recently published its conclusions on 
the scrapie situation in the EU after 10 years of monitoring and control of the 
disease in sheep and goats (EFSA 2014), and one of the most interesting findings 
was the Icelandic experience regarding the effect of disinfection in scrapie 
control. The Icelandic plan consisted of: culling scrapie-affected sheep or the 
whole flock in newly diagnosed outbreaks; deep cleaning and disinfection of 
stables, sheds, barns and equipment with high pressure washing followed by 
cleaning with 500 parts per million of hypochlorite; drying and treatment with 
300 ppm of iodophor; and restocking was not permitted for at least two years. 
Even when all of these measures were implemented, scrapie recurred on several 
farms, indicating that the infectious agent survived for years in the 
environment, even as many as 16 years after restocking (Georgsson and others 
2006).
In the rest of the countries considered in the EFSA (2014) report, 
recommendations for disinfection measures were not specifically defined at the 
government level. In the report, the only recommendation that is made for sheep 
is repopulation with sheep with scrapie-resistant genotypes. This reduces the 
risk of scrapie recurrence but it is difficult to know its effect on the 
infection.
Until the EFSA was established (in May 2003), scientific opinions about TSE 
s were provided by the Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) of the EC, whose 
advice regarding inactivation procedures focused on treating animal waste at 
high temperatures (150°C for three hours) and high pressure alkaline hydrolysis 
(SSC 2003). At the same time, the TSE Risk Management Subgroup of the Advisory 
Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) in the UK published guidance on safe 
working and the prevention of TSE infection. Annex C of the ACDP report 
established that sodium hypochlorite was considered to be effective, but only if 
20,000 ppm of available chlorine was present for at least one hour, which has 
practical limitations such as the release of chlorine gas, corrosion, 
incompatibility with formaldehyde, alcohols and acids, rapid inactivation of its 
active chemicals and the stability of dilutions (ACDP 2009).
In an international context, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) 
does not recommend a specific disinfection protocol for prion agents in its 
Terrestrial Code or Manual. Chapter 4.13 of the Terrestrial Code, General 
recommendations on disinfection and disinsection (OIE 2014), focuses on 
foot-and-mouth disease virus, mycobacteria and Bacillus anthracis, but not on 
prion disinfection. Nevertheless, the last update published by the OIE on bovine 
spongiform encephalopathy (OIE 2012) indicates that few effective 
decontamination techniques are available to inactivate the agent on surfaces, 
and recommends the removal of all organic material and the use of sodium 
hydroxide, or a sodium hypochlorite solution containing 2 per cent available 
chlorine, for more than one hour at 20ºC.
The World Health Organization outlines guidelines for the control of TSE s, 
and also emphasises the importance of mechanically cleaning surfaces before 
disinfection with sodium hydroxide or sodium hypochlorite for one hour (WHO 
1999).
Finally, the relevant agencies in both Canada and the USA suggest that the 
best treatments for surfaces potentially contaminated with prions are sodium 
hydroxide or sodium hypochlorite at 20,000 ppm. This is a 2 per cent solution, 
while most commercial household bleaches contain 5.25 per cent sodium 
hypochlorite. It is therefore recommended to dilute one part 5.25 per cent 
bleach with 1.5 parts water (CDC 2009, Canadian Food Inspection Agency 
2013).
So what should we do about disinfection against prions? First, it is 
suggested that a single protocol be created by international authorities to 
homogenise inactivation procedures and enable their application in all 
scrapie-affected countries. Sodium hypochlorite with 20,000 ppm of available 
chlorine seems to be the procedure used in most countries, as noted in a paper 
summarised on p 99 of this issue of Veterinary Record (Hawkins and others 2015). 
But are we totally sure of its effectiveness as a preventive measure in a 
scrapie outbreak? Would an in-depth study of the recurrence of scrapie disease 
be needed?
What we can conclude is that, if we want to fight prion diseases, and 
specifically classical scrapie, we must focus on the accuracy of diagnosis, 
monitoring and surveillance; appropriate animal identification and control of 
movements; and, in the end, have homogeneous and suitable protocols to 
decontaminate and disinfect lambing barns, sheds and equipment available to 
veterinarians and farmers. Finally, further investigations into the resistance 
of prion proteins in the diversity of environmental surfaces are required.
References
snip...
98 | Veterinary Record | January 24, 2015
Persistence of ovine scrapie infectivity in a farm environment following 
cleaning and decontamination 
Steve A. C. Hawkins, MIBiol, Pathology Department1, Hugh A. Simmons, BVSc 
MRCVS, MBA, MA Animal Services Unit1, Kevin C. Gough, BSc, PhD2 and Ben C. 
Maddison, BSc, PhD3 + Author Affiliations
1Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey 
KT15 3NB, UK 2School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of 
Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK 3ADAS 
UK, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham, 
Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK E-mail for 
correspondence: ben.maddison@adas.co.uk Abstract Scrapie of sheep/goats and 
chronic wasting disease of deer/elk are contagious prion diseases where 
environmental reservoirs are directly implicated in the transmission of disease. 
In this study, the effectiveness of recommended scrapie farm decontamination 
regimens was evaluated by a sheep bioassay using buildings naturally 
contaminated with scrapie. Pens within a farm building were treated with either 
20,000 parts per million free chorine solution for one hour or were treated with 
the same but were followed by painting and full re-galvanisation or replacement 
of metalwork within the pen. Scrapie susceptible lambs of the PRNP genotype 
VRQ/VRQ were reared within these pens and their scrapie status was monitored by 
recto-anal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. All animals became infected over 
an 18-month period, even in the pen that had been subject to the most stringent 
decontamination process. These data suggest that recommended current guidelines 
for the decontamination of farm buildings following outbreaks of scrapie do 
little to reduce the titre of infectious scrapie material and that environmental 
recontamination could also be an issue associated with these premises. 
SNIP...
Discussion
Thorough pressure washing of a pen had no effect on the amount of 
bioavailable scrapie infectivity (pen B). The routine removal of prions from 
surfaces within a laboratory setting is treatment for a minimum of one hour with 
20,000 ppm free chlorine, a method originally based on the use of brain 
macerates from infected rodents to evaluate the effectiveness of decontamination 
(Kimberlin and others 1983). Further studies have also investigated the 
effectiveness of hypochlorite disinfection of metal surfaces to simulate the 
decontamination of surgical devices within a hospital setting. Such treatments 
with hypochlorite solution were able to reduce infectivity by 5.5 logs to lower 
than the sensitivity of the bioassay used (Lemmer and others 2004). Analogous 
treatment of the pen surfaces did not effectively remove the levels of scrapie 
infectivity over that of the control pens, indicating that this method of 
decontamination is not effective within a farm setting. This may be due to the 
high level of biological matrix that is present upon surfaces within the farm 
environment, which may reduce the amount of free chlorine available to 
inactivate any infectious prion. Remarkably 1/5 sheep introduced into pen D had 
also became scrapie positive within nine months, with all animals in this pen 
being RAMALT positive by 18 months of age. Pen D was no further away from the 
control pen (pen A) than any of the other pens within this barn. Localised hot 
spots of infectivity may be present within scrapie-contaminated environments, 
but it is unlikely that pen D area had an amount of scrapie contamination that 
was significantly different than the other areas within this building. 
Similarly, there were no differences in how the biosecurity of pen D was 
maintained, or how this pen was ventilated compared with the other pens. This 
observation, perhaps, indicates the slower kinetics of disease uptake within 
this pen and is consistent with a more thorough prion removal and 
recontamination. These observations may also account for the presence of 
inadvertent scrapie cases within other studies, where despite stringent 
biosecurity, control animals have become scrapie positive during challenge 
studies using barns that also housed scrapie-affected animals (Ryder and others 
2009). The bioassay data indicate that the exposure of the sheep to a farm 
environment after decontamination efforts thought to be effective in removing 
scrapie is sufficient for the animals to become infected with scrapie. The main 
exposure routes within this scenario are likely to be via the oral route, during 
feeding and drinking, and respiratory and conjunctival routes. It has been 
demonstrated that scrapie infectivity can be efficiently transmitted via the 
nasal route in sheep (Hamir and others 2008), as is the case for CWD in both 
murine models and in white-tailed deer (Denkers and others 2010, 2013). 
Recently, it has also been demonstrated that CWD prions presented as dust when 
bound to the soil mineral montmorillonite can be infectious via the nasal route 
(Nichols and others 2013). When considering pens C and D, the actual source of 
the infectious agent in the pens is not known, it is possible that biologically 
relevant levels of prion survive on surfaces during the decontamination regimen 
(pen C). With the use of galvanising and painting (pen D) covering and sealing 
the surface of the pen, it is possible that scrapie material recontaminated the 
pens by the movement of infectious prions contained within dusts originating 
from other parts of the barn that were not decontaminated or from other areas of 
the farm.
Given that scrapie prions are widespread on the surfaces of affected farms 
(Maddison and others 2010a), irrespective of the source of the infectious prions 
in the pens, this study clearly highlights the difficulties that are faced with 
the effective removal of environmentally associated scrapie infectivity. This is 
likely to be paralleled in CWD which shows strong similarities to scrapie in 
terms of both the dissemination of prions into the environment and the facile 
mode of disease transmission. These data further contribute to the understanding 
that prion diseases can be highly transmissible between susceptible individuals 
not just by direct contact but through highly stable environmental reservoirs 
that are refractory to decontamination.
The presence of these environmentally associated prions in farm buildings 
make the control of these diseases a considerable challenge, especially in 
animal species such as goats where there is lack of genetic resistance to 
scrapie and, therefore, no scope to re-stock farms with animals that are 
resistant to scrapie.
Scrapie Sheep Goats Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) 
Accepted October 12, 2014. Published Online First 31 October 2014 
Monday, November 3, 2014 
Persistence of ovine scrapie infectivity in a farm environment following 
cleaning and decontamination
PPo3-22:
Detection of Environmentally Associated PrPSc on a Farm with Endemic 
Scrapie
Ben C. Maddison,1 Claire A. Baker,1 Helen C. Rees,1 Linda A. Terry,2 Leigh 
Thorne,2 Susan J. Belworthy2 and Kevin C. Gough3 1ADAS-UK LTD; Department of 
Biology; University of Leicester; Leicester, UK; 2Veterinary Laboratories 
Agency; Surry, KT UK; 3Department of Veterinary Medicine and Science; University 
of Nottingham; Sutton Bonington, Loughborough UK
Key words: scrapie, evironmental persistence, sPMCA
Ovine scrapie shows considerable horizontal transmission, yet the routes of 
transmission and specifically the role of fomites in transmission remain poorly 
defined. Here we present biochemical data demonstrating that on a 
scrapie-affected sheep farm, scrapie prion contamination is widespread. It was 
anticipated at the outset that if prions contaminate the environment that they 
would be there at extremely low levels, as such the most sensitive method 
available for the detection of PrPSc, serial Protein Misfolding Cyclic 
Amplification (sPMCA), was used in this study. We investigated the distribution 
of environmental scrapie prions by applying ovine sPMCA to samples taken from a 
range of surfaces that were accessible to animals and could be collected by use 
of a wetted foam swab. Prion was amplified by sPMCA from a number of these 
environmental swab samples including those taken from metal, plastic and wooden 
surfaces, both in the indoor and outdoor environment. At the time of sampling 
there had been no sheep contact with these areas for at least 20 days prior to 
sampling indicating that prions persist for at least this duration in the 
environment. These data implicate inanimate objects as environmental reservoirs 
of prion infectivity which are likely to contribute to disease transmission. 
Wednesday, July 01, 2015 
TEXAS Chronic Wasting Disease Detected in Medina County Captive Deer 
Thursday, July 09, 2015 
TEXAS Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Herd Plan for Trace-Forward Exposed 
Herd with Testing of Exposed Animals 
Tuesday, July 14, 2015 
Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission Special Meeting Thursday on Chronic 
Wasting Disease CWD 
Rare report of deer disease in Texas causes stir 
Houston Chronicle
Rare report of deer disease in Texas causes stir, especially since it’s the 
8 case of CWD documented in Texas, and the first case of CWD in Captive deer. 
here is how I would have titled this article, and why. 
Shannon Tompkins Finally Breaks Silence on Texas First Captive CWD Case and 
Starts Off Spreading False Information About Risk Factors. ... 
Thursday, July 16, 2015 
Wednesday, March 18, 2015 
Chronic Wasting Disease CWD Confirmed Texas Trans Pecos March 18, 
2015
Wednesday, March 25, 2015 
Chronic Wasting Disease CWD Cases Confirmed In New Mexico 2013 and 2014 
UPDATE 2015
Thursday, May 02, 2013 
*** Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Texas Important Update on OBEX ONLY 
TEXTING 
Monday, February 11, 2013 
TEXAS CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD Four New Positives Found in Trans Pecos 
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 
Chronic Wasting Disease Detected in Far West Texas 
Monday, March 26, 2012 
Texas Prepares for Chronic Wasting Disease CWD Possibility in Far West 
Texas 
***for anyone interested, here is some history of CWD along the Texas, New 
Mexico border, and my attempt to keep up with it...terry 
snip...
see history CWD Texas, New Mexico Border ; 
Monday, March 26, 2012 
3 CASES OF CWD FOUND NEW MEXICO MULE DEER SEVERAL MILES FROM TEXAS BORDER 
Sunday, October 04, 2009 
CWD NEW MEXICO SPREADING SOUTH TO TEXAS 2009 2009 Summary of Chronic 
Wasting Disease in New Mexico New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 
Friday, May 22, 2015 
*** Chronic Wasting Disease and Program Updates - 2014 NEUSAHA Annual 
Meeting 12-14 May 2014
Sunday, July 12, 2015 
*** Insights into CWD and BSE species barriers using real-time conversion 
Tuesday, July 14, 2015 
*** TWO Escaped Captive Deer on the loose in Eau Claire County Wisconsin 
CWD postive farm Yellow ear tag 
Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor Frank Jezioro, Director 
News Release: November 4, 2011 
Facebook: WV Commerce - State Parks 
Hoy Murphy, Public Information Officer (304) 957-9365 hoy.r.murphy@wv.gov 
Contact: Curtis Taylor, Wildlife Resources Section Chief 304-558-2771 
DNR.Wildlife@wv.gov 
Elk escape from captive cervid facility in Pennsylvania near West Virginia 
border 
SOUTH CHARLESTON, W.Va. – The West Virginia Division of Natural Resources 
(WVDNR) has confirmed with officials from the Pennsylvania Department of 
Agriculture (PDA) that at least two elk, including one adult bull and one cow, 
have escaped from a captive cervid facility (deer and elk farms) in Greene 
County, Pa. Greene County shares a common border with Marshall, Wetzel and 
Monongalia counties in West Virginia. The elk escaped from a captive cervid 
facility located approximately three miles from the West Virginia-Pennsylvania 
border. 
The PDA regulates captive cervid facilities in Pennsylvania. A 
representative of the agency was unaware if the recent escaped elk were tagged. 
The WVDNR regulates captive cervid facilities in West Virginia. In West 
Virginia, all captive cervids in breeding facilities must be ear-tagged, and 
there are currently no reported elk escapes from any facility in West Virginia. 
A bull elk has been seen recently in Wetzel County, W.Va., according to 
WVDNR officials. There have been no reports of cow elk sightings in either 
Wetzel County, W.Va., or Greene County, Pa. No free-ranging wild elk live within 
150 miles of Wetzel County. The elk sighted in Wetzel County is likely the 
escaped animal from the captive facility in Pennsylvania. 
Friday, September 28, 2012 
Stray elk renews concerns about deer farm security Minnesota 
Monday, June 11, 2012 
*** OHIO Captive deer escapees and non-reporting ***
Friday, September 20, 2013 
Missouri State records show gaps in oversight of captive deer farms, 
ranches
a few escapees off the top of my head ;
Tuesday, November 27, 2012 
Pennsylvania ‘Pink 23’ Adams County exposed CWD Escaped Deer shot, but 
where are the other escapees ? 
Saturday, June 29, 2013 
PENNSYLVANIA CAPTIVE CWD INDEX HERD MATE YELLOW *47 STILL RUNNING LOOSE IN 
INDIANA, YELLOW NUMBER 2 STILL MISSING, AND OTHERS ON THE RUN STILL IN LOUISIANA 
Tuesday, June 11, 2013 
CWD GONE WILD, More cervid escapees from more shooting pens on the loose in 
Pennsylvania 
Thursday, October 23, 2014 
FIRST CASE OF CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CONFIRMED IN OHIO ON PRIVATE PRESERVE 
Thursday, April 02, 2015 
OHIO CONFIRMS SECOND POSTIVE CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD on Yoder's 
properties near Millersburg 
Wednesday, February 11, 2015 
World Class Whitetails quarantined CWD deer Daniel M. Yoder charged with 
two counts of tampering with evidence 
re those Texas mad cow cover up’s, you thought I might be kidding ??? 
2004, highly suspect stumbling and staggering mad cow reported, however, NO 
TESTING DONE, ON ORDERS FROM AUSTIN $ 
May 4, 2004 
Statement on Texas Cow With Central Nervous System Symptoms 
On Friday, April 30th, the Food and Drug Administration learned that a cow 
with central nervous system symptoms had been killed and shipped to a processor 
for rendering into animal protein for use in animal feed.
FDA, which is responsible for the safety of animal feed, immediately began 
an investigation. On Friday and throughout the weekend, FDA investigators 
inspected the slaughterhouse, the rendering facility, the farm where the animal 
came from, and the processor that initially received the cow from the 
slaughterhouse.
FDA's investigation showed that the animal in question had already been 
rendered into "meat and bone meal" (a type of protein animal feed). Over the 
weekend FDA was able to track down all the implicated material. That material is 
being held by the firm, which is cooperating fully with FDA.
Cattle with central nervous system symptoms are of particular interest 
because cattle with bovine spongiform encephalopathy or BSE, also known as "mad 
cow disease," can exhibit such symptoms. In this case, there is no way now to 
test for BSE. But even if the cow had BSE, FDA's animal feed rule would prohibit 
the feeding of its rendered protein to other ruminant animals (e.g., cows, 
goats, sheep, bison)... 
USDA regulations, any cow that exhibits signs of central nervous system 
(CNS)
According to a 1997 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (NHIS) 
Memorandum, brain samples all of such animals should be sent for BSE testing.2 
The memorandum notes that "it is essential that brain specimens be collected 
from adult cattle condemned for CNS signs as part of our national surveillance 
of BSE."
The cow slaughtered at the Lone Star Beef slaughterhouse last week 
staggered and fell, and was condemned ante mortem by FSIS personnel.4 Despite a 
request from APHIS personnel at the plant to conduct BSE testing, however, an 
APHIS supervisor in Austin reportedly refused the test and instructed the plant 
to send the carcass for rendering.5
May 13,2004
Page 2
snip...
The cow slaughtered at the Lone Star Beef slaughterhouse last week 
staggered and fell, and was condemned ante mortem by FSIS personnel.4 Despite a 
request from APHIS personnel at the plant to conduct BSE testing, however, an 
APHIS supervisor in Austin reportedly refused the test and instructed the plant 
to send the carcass for rendering.5
This sequence of events is troubling, and it raises the question of whether 
this is an isolated incident. In 1997, USDA noted a major gap between the number 
of cattle condemned for CNS symptoms and the number of these cows actually 
tested for mad cow disease. The Department found: 
 -------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: re-USDA's surveillance plan for BSE aka mad cow disease 
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 16:59:07 -0500 
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." 
To: paffairs@oig.hhs.gov, HHSTips@oig.hhs.gov, contactOIG@hhsc.state.tx.us 
Greetings Honorable Paul Feeney, Keith Arnold, and William Busbyet al at 
OIG, ............... 
snip... 
There will be several more emails of my research to follow. I respectfully 
request a full inquiry into the cover-up of TSEs in the United States of America 
over the past 30 years. I would be happy to testify... 
Thank you, I am sincerely, Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box 42 Bacliff, 
Texas USA 77518 xxx xxx xxxx 
Date: June 14, 2005 at 1:46 pm PST In 
Reply to: Re: Transcript Ag. Secretary Mike Johanns and Dr. John Clifford, 
Regarding further analysis of BSE Inconclusive Test Results posted by TSS on 
June 13, 2005 at 7:33 pm: 
Secretary of Agriculture Ann M. Veneman resigns Nov 15 2004, three days 
later inclusive Mad Cow is announced. June 7th 2005 Bill Hawks Under Secretary 
for Marketing and Regulatory Programs resigns. Three days later same mad cow 
found in November turns out to be positive. Both resignation are unexpected. 
just pondering... TSS 
MAD COW IN TEXAS NOVEMBER 2004. ...TSS 
 -------- Original Message -------- 
Director, Public Information Carla Everett ceverett@tahc.state.tx.us 
Subject: Re: BSE 'INCONCLUSIVE' COW from TEXAS ??? 
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:12:15 –0600 
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." 
To: Carla Everett References: <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to 
unmask] us> 
Greetings Carla,still hear a rumor; 
Texas single beef cow not born in Canada no beef entered the food chain? 
and i see the TEXAS department of animal health is ramping up forsomething, 
but they forgot a url for update?I HAVE NO ACTUAL CONFIRMATION YET...can you 
confirm??? 
terry 
-------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: Re: BSE 'INCONCLUSIVE' COW from TEXAS ??? 
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:38:21 –0600 
From: Carla Everett 
To: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." References: <[log in to unmask]> 
The USDA has made a statement, and we are referring all callers to the USDA 
web site. We have no information about the animal being in Texas. Carla At 09:44 
AM 11/19/2004, you wrote:>Greetings Carla,>>i am getting 
unsubstantiated claims of this BSE 'inconclusive' cow is from>TEXAS. can you 
comment on this either way please?>>thank you,>Terry S. Singeltary 
Sr.>> 
 -------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: Re: BSE 'INCONCLUSIVE' COW from TEXAS ??? 
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:33:20 -0600 From: Carla Everett 
To: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." 
References: ...sniptss 
our computer department was working on a place holder we could post USDA's 
announcement of any results. There are no results to be announced tonight by 
NVSL, so we are back in a waiting mode and will post the USDA announcement when 
we hear something. At 06:05 PM 11/22/2004, 
you wrote: 
>why was the announcement on your TAHC site removed? 
>>Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy: 
>November 22: Press Release title here 
>>star image More BSE information 
>>>>terry 
>>Carla Everett wrote: 
>>>no confirmation on the U.S.' inconclusive test... 
>>no confirmation on location of animal.>>>>>> 
========================== 
-------- Original Message -------- 
Director, Public Information Carla Everett ceverett@tahc.state.tx.us 
Subject: Re: BSE 'INCONCLUSIVE' COW from TEXAS ??? 
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:12:15 –0600 
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." 
To: Carla Everett References: <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to 
unmask] us> 
Greetings Carla,still hear a rumor; 
Texas single beef cow not born in Canada no beef entered the food chain? 
and i see the TEXAS department of animal health is ramping up forsomething, 
but they forgot a url for update?I HAVE NO ACTUAL CONFIRMATION YET...can you 
confirm??? 
terry 
============================== 
 USDA did not test possible mad cows
By Steve Mitchell
United Press International
Published 6/8/2004 9:30 PM
WASHINGTON, June 8 (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of Agriculture claims 
ittested 500 cows with signs of a brain disorder for mad cow disease last year, 
but agency documents obtained by United Press International show the agency 
tested only half that number. 
 ""These 9,200 cases were different because brain tissue samples were 
preserved with formalin, which makes them suitable for only one type of 
test--immunohistochemistry, or IHC." 
THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON! 
THE IHC test has been proven to be the LEAST LIKELY to detect BSE/TSE in 
the bovine, and these were probably from the most high risk cattle pool, the 
ones the USDA et al, SHOULD have been testing. ...TSS 
TEXAS 2ND MAD COW THAT WAS COVERED UP, AFTER AN ACT OF CONGRESS, AND CALLS 
FROM TSE PRION SCIENTIST AROUND THE GLOBE, THIS 2ND MAD COW IN TEXAS WAS 
CONFIRMED 
THE USDA MAD COW FOLLIES POSITIVE TEST COVER UP 
JOHANNS SECRET POSTIVE MAD COW TEST THAT WERE IGNORED 
OIG AND THE HONORABLE FONG CONFIRMS TEXAS MAD AFTER AN ACT OF CONGRESS 7 
MONTHS LATER 
TEXAS MAD COW 
THEY DID FINALLY TEST AFTER SITTING 7+ MONTHS ON A SHELF WHILE GW BORE THE 
BSE MRR POLICY, i.e. legal trading of all strains of TSE. now understand, i 
confirmed this case 7 months earlier to the TAHC, and then, only after i 
contacted the Honorable Phyllis Fong and after an act of Congress, this animal 
was finally confirmed ; 
During the course of the investigation, USDA removed and tested a total of 
67 animals of interest from the farm where the index animal's herd originated. 
All of these animals tested negative for BSE. 200 adult animals of interest were 
determined to have left the index farm. Of these 200, APHIS officials determined 
that 143 had gone to slaughter, two were found alive (one was determined not to 
be of interest because of its age and the other tested negative), 34 are 
presumed dead, one is known dead and 20 have been classified as untraceable. In 
addition to the adult animals, APHIS was looking for two calves born to the 
index animal. Due to record keeping and identification issues, APHIS had to 
trace 213 calves. Of these 213 calves, 208 entered feeding and slaughter 
channels, four are presumed to have entered feeding and slaughter channels and 
one calf was untraceable. 
Executive Summary In June 2005, an inconclusive bovine spongiform 
encephalopathy (BSE) sample from November 2004, that had originally been 
classified as negative on the immunohistochemistry test, was confirmed positive 
on SAF immunoblot (Western blot). The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 
identified the herd of origin for the index cow in Texas; that identification 
was confirmed by DNA analysis. USDA, in close cooperation with the Texas Animal 
Health Commission (TAHC), established an incident command post (ICP) and began 
response activities according to USDA’s BSE Response Plan of September 2004. 
Response personnel removed at-risk cattle and cattle of interest (COI) from the 
index herd, euthanized them, and tested them for BSE; all were negative. USDA 
and the State extensively traced all at-risk cattle and COI that left the index 
herd. The majority of these animals entered rendering and/or slaughter channels 
well before the investigation began. USDA’s response to the Texas finding was 
thorough and effective. 
snip... 
Trace Herd 3 The owner of Trace Herd 3 was identified as possibly having 
received an animal of interest. The herd was placed under hold order on 7/27/05. 
The herd inventory was conducted on 7/28/05. The animal of interest was not 
present within the herd, and the hold order was released on 7/28/05. The person 
who thought he sold the animal to the owner of Trace Herd 3 had no records and 
could not remember who else he might have sold the cow to. Additionally, a 
search of GDB for all cattle sold through the markets by that individual did not 
result in a match to the animal of interest. The animal of interest traced to 
this herd was classified as untraceable because all leads were exhausted. 
Trace Herd 4 The owner of Trace Herd 4 was identified as having received 
one of the COI through an order buyer. Trace Herd 4 was placed under hold order 
on 7/29/05. A complete herd inventory was conducted on 8/22/05 and 8/23/05. 
There were 233 head of cattle that were examined individually by both State and 
Federal personnel for all man-made identification and brands. The animal of 
interest was not present within the herd. Several animals were reported to have 
died in the herd sometime after they arrived on the premises in April 2005. A 
final search of GDB records yielded no further results on the eartag of interest 
at either subsequent market sale or slaughter. With all leads having been 
exhausted, this animal of interest has been classified as untraceable. The hold 
order on Trace Herd 4 was released on 8/23/05. 
Trace Herd 5 The owner of Trace Herd 5 was identified as having received 
two COI and was placed under hold order on 8/1/05. Trace Herd 5 is made up of 67 
head of cattle in multiple pastures. During the course of the herd inventory, 
the owner located records that indicated that one of the COI, a known birth 
cohort, had been sold to Trace Herd 8 where she was subsequently found alive. 
Upon completion of the herd inventory, the other animal of interest was not 
found within the herd. A GDB search of all recorded herd tests conducted on 
Trace Herd 5 and all market sales by the owner failed to locate the 
identification tag of the animal of interest and she was subsequently classified 
as untraceable due to all leads having been exhausted. The hold order on Trace 
Herd 5 was released on 8/8/05. 
Trace Herd 6 The owner of Trace Herd 6 was identified as possibly having 
received an animal of interest and was placed under hold order on 8/1/05. This 
herd is made up of 58 head of cattle on two pastures. A herd inventory was 
conducted and the animal of interest was not present within the herd. The owner 
of Trace Herd 6 had very limited records and was unable to provide further 
information on where the cow might have gone after he purchased her from the 
livestock market. A search of GDB for all cattle sold through the markets by 
that individual did not result in a match to the animal of interest. 
Additionally, many of the animals presented for sale by the owner of the herd 
had been re-tagged at the market effectually losing the traceability of the 
history of that animal prior to re-tagging. The animal of interest traced to 
this herd was classified as untraceable due to all leads having been exhausted. 
The hold order on Trace Herd 6 was released on 8/3/05. 
Trace Herd 7 The owner of Trace Herd 7 was identified as having received an 
animal of interest and was placed under hold order on 8/1/05. Trace Herd 7 
contains 487 head of cattle on multiple pastures in multiple parts of the State, 
including a unit kept on an island. The island location is a particularly rough 
place to keep cattle and the owner claimed to have lost 22 head on the island in 
2004 due to liver flukes. Upon completion of the herd inventory, the animal of 
interest was not found present within Trace Herd 7. A GDB search of all recorded 
herd tests conducted on Trace Herd 7 and all market sales by the owner failed to 
locate the identification tag of the animal of interest. The cow was 
subsequently classified as untraceable. It is quite possible though that she may 
have died within the herd, especially if she belonged to the island unit. The 
hold order on Trace Herd 7 was released on 8/8/05. 
Tuesday, November 02, 2010
*** BSE - ATYPICAL LESION DISTRIBUTION (RBSE 92-21367) statutory (obex 
only) diagnostic criteria CVL 1992
THE SECRET MAD COW POSITIVE TEST, THAT WAS COVERED UP 
Owner and Corporation Plead Guilty to Defrauding Bovine Spongiform 
Encephalopathy (BSE) Surveillance Program 
An Arizona meat processing company and its owner pled guilty in February 
2007 to charges of theft of Government funds, mail fraud, and wire fraud. The 
owner and his company defrauded the BSE Surveillance Program when they falsified 
BSE Surveillance Data Collection Forms and then submitted payment requests to 
USDA for the services. In addition to the targeted sample population (those 
cattle that were more than 30 months old or had other risk factors for BSE), the 
owner submitted to USDA, or caused to be submitted, BSE obex (brain stem) 
samples from healthy USDA-inspected cattle. As a result, the owner fraudulently 
received approximately $390,000. Sentencing is scheduled for May 2007. 
snip... 
4 USDA OIG SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS FY 2007 1st Half 
PAUL BROWN COMMENT TO ME ON THIS ISSUE 
Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:10 AM 
"Actually, Terry, I have been critical of the USDA handling of the mad cow 
issue for some years, and with Linda Detwiler and others sent lengthy detailed 
critiques and recommendations to both the USDA and the Canadian Food Agency." 
end...tss 
Saturday, May 26, 2012 
Are USDA assurances on mad cow case 'gross oversimplification'? 
SNIP... 
What irks many scientists is the USDA’s April 25 statement that the rare 
disease is “not generally associated with an animal consuming infected feed.” 
The USDA’s conclusion is a “gross oversimplification,” said Dr. Paul Brown, 
one of the world’s experts on this type of disease who retired recently from the 
National Institutes of Health. "(The agency) has no foundation on which to base 
that statement.” 
“We can’t say it’s not feed related,” agreed Dr. Linda Detwiler, an 
official with the USDA during the Clinton Administration now at Mississippi 
State. 
In the May 1 email to me, USDA’s Cole backed off a bit. “No one knows the 
origins of atypical cases of BSE,” she said 
The argument about feed is critical because if feed is the cause, not a 
spontaneous mutation, the California cow could be part of a larger outbreak. 
SNIP... 
Saturday, August 4, 2012 
*** Final Feed Investigation Summary - California BSE Case - July 2012 
in the url that follows, I have posted 
SRM breaches first, as late as 2011. 
then 
MAD COW FEED BAN BREACHES AND TONNAGES OF MAD COW FEED IN COMMERCE up until 
2007, when they ceased posting them. 
then, 
MAD COW SURVEILLANCE BREACHES. 
Friday, May 18, 2012 
Update from APHIS Regarding a Detection of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy 
(BSE) in the United States Friday May 18, 2012 
2009 UPDATE ON ALABAMA AND TEXAS MAD COWS 2005 and 2006 
 PLEASE SEE LATEST SCIENCE ON SPORADIC CJD POTENTIAL LINKS TO DIFFERENT 
ANIMAL TSE PRION DISEASE ; 
sporadic CJD now linked to c-BSE, L type BASE BSE (CALIFORNIA), Scrapie, 
and atypical Scrapie, with much concern about CWD 
***Scrapie, as recently evoked in humanized mice (Cassard, 2014), is the 
third potentially zoonotic PD (with BSE and L-type BSE), 
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases. 
O.05: Transmission of prions to primates after extended silent incubation 
periods: Implications for BSE and scrapie risk assessment in human populations 
Emmanuel Comoy, Jacqueline Mikol, Val erie Durand, Sophie Luccantoni, 
Evelyne Correia, Nathalie Lescoutra, Capucine Dehen, and Jean-Philippe Deslys 
Atomic Energy Commission; Fontenay-aux-Roses, France 
Prion diseases (PD) are the unique neurodegenerative proteinopathies 
reputed to be transmissible under field conditions since decades. The 
transmission of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) to humans evidenced that 
an animal PD might be zoonotic under appropriate conditions. Contrarily, in the 
absence of obvious (epidemiological or experimental) elements supporting a 
transmission or genetic predispositions, PD, like the other proteinopathies, are 
reputed to occur spontaneously (atpical animal prion strains, sporadic CJD 
summing 80% of human prion cases). Non-human primate models provided the first 
evidences supporting the transmissibiity of human prion strains and the zoonotic 
potential of BSE. Among them, cynomolgus macaques brought major information for 
BSE risk assessment for human health (Chen, 2014), according to their 
phylogenetic proximity to humans and extended lifetime. We used this model to 
assess the zoonotic potential of other animal PD from bovine, ovine and cervid 
origins even after very long silent incubation periods. 
***We recently observed the direct transmission of a natural classical 
scrapie isolate to macaque after a 10-year silent incubation period, with 
features similar to some reported for human cases of sporadic CJD, albeit 
requiring fourfold longe incubation than BSE. 
***Scrapie, as recently evoked in humanized mice (Cassard, 2014), is the 
third potentially zoonotic PD (with BSE and L-type BSE), 
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases. 
We will present an updated panorama of our different transmission studies 
and discuss the implications of such extended incubation periods on risk 
assessment of animal PD for human health. 
=============== 
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases...TSS 
=============== 
2014 
***Moreover, L-BSE has been transmitted more easily to transgenic mice 
overexpressing a human PrP [13,14] or to primates [15,16] than C-BSE. 
***It has been suggested that some sporadic CJD subtypes in humans may 
result from an exposure to the L-BSE agent. 
*** Lending support to this hypothesis, pathological and biochemical 
similarities have been observed between L-BSE and an sCJD subtype (MV genotype 
at codon 129 of PRNP) [17], and between L-BSE infected non-human primate and 
another sCJD subtype (MM genotype) [15]. 
snip... 
Monday, October 10, 2011 
EFSA Journal 2011 The European Response to BSE: A Success Story 
snip... 
EFSA and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 
recently delivered a scientific opinion on any possible epidemiological or 
molecular association between TSEs in animals and humans (EFSA Panel on 
Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) and ECDC, 2011). This opinion confirmed Classical 
BSE prions as the only TSE agents demonstrated to be zoonotic so far 
*** but the possibility that a small proportion of human cases so far 
classified as "sporadic" CJD are of zoonotic origin could not be excluded. 
*** Moreover, transmission experiments to non-human primates suggest that 
some TSE agents in addition to Classical BSE prions in cattle (namely L-type 
Atypical BSE, Classical BSE in sheep, transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) 
and chronic wasting disease (CWD) agents) might have zoonotic potential. 
snip... 
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Seven main threats for the future linked to prions
First threat
The TSE road map defining the evolution of European policy for protection 
against prion diseases is based on a certain numbers of hypotheses some of which 
may turn out to be erroneous. In particular, a form of BSE (called atypical 
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy), recently identified by systematic testing in 
aged cattle without clinical signs, may be the origin of classical BSE and thus 
potentially constitute a reservoir, which may be impossible to eradicate if a 
sporadic origin is confirmed. 
*** Also, a link is suspected between atypical BSE and some apparently 
sporadic cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. 
*** These atypical BSE cases constitute an unforeseen first threat that 
could sharply modify the European approach to prion diseases.
Second threat
snip... 
*** HUMAN MAD COW DISEASE nvCJD TEXAS CASE NOT LINKED TO EUROPEAN TRAVEL 
CDC ***
Sunday, November 23, 2014 
*** Confirmed Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (variant CJD) Case in Texas 
in June 2014 confirmed as USA case NOT European *** 
the patient had resided in Kuwait, Russia and Lebanon. The completed 
investigation did not support the patient's having had extended travel to 
European countries, including the United Kingdom, or travel to Saudi Arabia. The 
specific overseas country where this patient’s infection occurred is less clear 
largely because the investigation did not definitely link him to a country where 
other known vCJD cases likely had been infected. 
Sunday, December 14, 2014 
*** ALERT new variant Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease nvCJD or vCJD, sporadic CJD 
strains, TSE prion aka Mad Cow Disease United States of America Update December 
14, 2014 Report ***
Tuesday, June 23, 2015 
Report on the monitoring and testing of ruminants for the presence of 
transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) in the EU in 2013 Final version 
18 May 2015
Tuesday, December 16, 2014 
Evidence for zoonotic potential of ovine scrapie prions 
Hervé Cassard,1, n1 Juan-Maria Torres,2, n1 Caroline Lacroux,1, Jean-Yves 
Douet,1, Sylvie L. Benestad,3, Frédéric Lantier,4, Séverine Lugan,1, Isabelle 
Lantier,4, Pierrette Costes,1, Naima Aron,1, Fabienne Reine,5, Laetitia 
Herzog,5, Juan-Carlos Espinosa,2, Vincent Beringue5, & Olivier Andréoletti1, 
Affiliations Contributions Corresponding author Journal name: Nature 
Communications Volume: 5, Article number: 5821 DOI: doi:10.1038/ncomms6821 
Received 07 August 2014 Accepted 10 November 2014 Published 16 December 2014 
Abstract 
Although Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) is the cause of variant 
Creutzfeldt Jakob disease (vCJD) in humans, the zoonotic potential of scrapie 
prions remains unknown. Mice genetically engineered to overexpress the human 
prion protein (tgHu) have emerged as highly relevant models for gauging the 
capacity of prions to transmit to humans. These models can propagate human 
prions without any apparent transmission barrier and have been used used to 
confirm the zoonotic ability of BSE. Here we show that a panel of sheep scrapie 
prions transmit to several tgHu mice models with an efficiency comparable to 
that of cattle BSE. ***The serial transmission of different scrapie isolates in 
these mice led to the propagation of prions that are phenotypically identical to 
those causing sporadic CJD (sCJD) in humans. ***These results demonstrate that 
scrapie prions have a zoonotic potential and raise new questions about the 
possible link between animal and human prions. 
Subject terms: Biological sciences• Medical research At a glance 
why do we not want to do TSE transmission studies on chimpanzees $ 
5. A positive result from a chimpanzee challenged severly would likely 
create alarm in some circles even if the result could not be interpreted for 
man. I have a view that all these agents could be transmitted provided a large 
enough dose by appropriate routes was given and the animals kept long enough. 
Until the mechanisms of the species barrier are more clearly understood it might 
be best to retain that hypothesis. 
snip... 
R. BRADLEY 
1: J Infect Dis 1980 Aug;142(2):205-8 
Oral transmission of kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and scrapie to 
nonhuman primates. 
Gibbs CJ Jr, Amyx HL, Bacote A, Masters CL, Gajdusek DC. 
Kuru and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease of humans and scrapie disease of sheep 
and goats were transmitted to squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) that were 
exposed to the infectious agents only by their nonforced consumption of known 
infectious tissues. The asymptomatic incubation period in the one monkey exposed 
to the virus of kuru was 36 months; that in the two monkeys exposed to the virus 
of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was 23 and 27 months, respectively; and that in the 
two monkeys exposed to the virus of scrapie was 25 and 32 months, respectively. 
Careful physical examination of the buccal cavities of all of the monkeys failed 
to reveal signs or oral lesions. One additional monkey similarly exposed to kuru 
has remained asymptomatic during the 39 months that it has been under 
observation. 
snip... 
The successful transmission of kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and scrapie 
by natural feeding to squirrel monkeys that we have reported provides further 
grounds for concern that scrapie-infected meat may occasionally give rise in 
humans to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. 
PMID: 6997404 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6997404&dopt=Abstract 
Recently the question has again been brought up as to whether scrapie is 
transmissible to man. This has followed reports that the disease has been 
transmitted to primates. One particularly lurid speculation (Gajdusek 1977) 
conjectures that the agents of scrapie, kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and 
transmissible encephalopathy of mink are varieties of a single "virus". The U.S. 
Department of Agriculture concluded that it could "no longer justify or permit 
scrapie-blood line and scrapie-exposed sheep and goats to be processed for human 
or animal food at slaughter or rendering plants" (ARC 84/77)" The problem is 
emphasised by the finding that some strains of scrapie produce lesions identical 
to the once which characterise the human dementias" 
Whether true or not. the hypothesis that these agents might be 
transmissible to man raises two considerations. First, the safety of laboratory 
personnel requires prompt attention. Second, action such as the "scorched meat" 
policy of USDA makes the solution of the acrapie problem urgent if the sheep 
industry is not to suffer grievously. 
snip... 
76/10.12/4.6 
Nature. 1972 Mar 10;236(5341):73-4. 
Transmission of scrapie to the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). 
Gibbs CJ Jr, Gajdusek DC. 
Nature 236, 73 - 74 (10 March 1972); doi:10.1038/236073a0 
Transmission of Scrapie to the Cynomolgus Monkey (Macaca fascicularis) 
C. J. GIBBS jun. & D. C. GAJDUSEK 
National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, National Institutes 
of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 
SCRAPIE has been transmitted to the cynomolgus, or crab-eating, monkey 
(Macaca fascicularis) with an incubation period of more than 5 yr from the time 
of intracerebral inoculation of scrapie-infected mouse brain. The animal 
developed a chronic central nervous system degeneration, with ataxia, tremor and 
myoclonus with associated severe scrapie-like pathology of intensive astroglial 
hypertrophy and proliferation, neuronal vacuolation and status spongiosus of 
grey matter. The strain of scrapie virus used was the eighth passage in Swiss 
mice (NIH) of a Compton strain of scrapie obtained as ninth intracerebral 
passage of the agent in goat brain, from Dr R. L. Chandler (ARC, Compton, 
Berkshire). 
Sunday, November 23, 2014 
*** Confirmed Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (variant CJD) Case in Texas 
in June 2014 confirmed as USA case NOT European ***
Terry S. Singeltary Sr., Bacliff, Texas USA 77518 flounder9@verizon.net 
    


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home